Cargando…
Comparison between Phase-Shift Full-Bridge Converters with Noncoupled and Coupled Current-Doubler Rectifier
This paper presents comparison between phase-shift full-bridge converters with noncoupled and coupled current-doubler rectifier. In high current capability and high step-down voltage conversion, a phase-shift full-bridge converter with a conventional current-doubler rectifier has the common limitati...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3870875/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24381521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/621896 |
_version_ | 1782296740607557632 |
---|---|
author | Tsai, Cheng-Tao Su, Jye-Chau Tseng, Sheng-Yu |
author_facet | Tsai, Cheng-Tao Su, Jye-Chau Tseng, Sheng-Yu |
author_sort | Tsai, Cheng-Tao |
collection | PubMed |
description | This paper presents comparison between phase-shift full-bridge converters with noncoupled and coupled current-doubler rectifier. In high current capability and high step-down voltage conversion, a phase-shift full-bridge converter with a conventional current-doubler rectifier has the common limitations of extremely low duty ratio and high component stresses. To overcome these limitations, a phase-shift full-bridge converter with a noncoupled current-doubler rectifier (NCDR) or a coupled current-doubler rectifier (CCDR) is, respectively, proposed and implemented. In this study, performance analysis and efficiency obtained from a 500 W phase-shift full-bridge converter with two improved current-doubler rectifiers are presented and compared. From their prototypes, experimental results have verified that the phase-shift full-bridge converter with NCDR has optimal duty ratio, lower component stresses, and output current ripple. In component count and efficiency comparison, CCDR has fewer components and higher efficiency at full load condition. For small size and high efficiency requirements, CCDR is relatively suitable for high step-down voltage and high efficiency applications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3870875 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38708752013-12-31 Comparison between Phase-Shift Full-Bridge Converters with Noncoupled and Coupled Current-Doubler Rectifier Tsai, Cheng-Tao Su, Jye-Chau Tseng, Sheng-Yu ScientificWorldJournal Research Article This paper presents comparison between phase-shift full-bridge converters with noncoupled and coupled current-doubler rectifier. In high current capability and high step-down voltage conversion, a phase-shift full-bridge converter with a conventional current-doubler rectifier has the common limitations of extremely low duty ratio and high component stresses. To overcome these limitations, a phase-shift full-bridge converter with a noncoupled current-doubler rectifier (NCDR) or a coupled current-doubler rectifier (CCDR) is, respectively, proposed and implemented. In this study, performance analysis and efficiency obtained from a 500 W phase-shift full-bridge converter with two improved current-doubler rectifiers are presented and compared. From their prototypes, experimental results have verified that the phase-shift full-bridge converter with NCDR has optimal duty ratio, lower component stresses, and output current ripple. In component count and efficiency comparison, CCDR has fewer components and higher efficiency at full load condition. For small size and high efficiency requirements, CCDR is relatively suitable for high step-down voltage and high efficiency applications. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3870875/ /pubmed/24381521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/621896 Text en Copyright © 2013 Cheng-Tao Tsai et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Tsai, Cheng-Tao Su, Jye-Chau Tseng, Sheng-Yu Comparison between Phase-Shift Full-Bridge Converters with Noncoupled and Coupled Current-Doubler Rectifier |
title | Comparison between Phase-Shift Full-Bridge Converters with Noncoupled and Coupled Current-Doubler Rectifier |
title_full | Comparison between Phase-Shift Full-Bridge Converters with Noncoupled and Coupled Current-Doubler Rectifier |
title_fullStr | Comparison between Phase-Shift Full-Bridge Converters with Noncoupled and Coupled Current-Doubler Rectifier |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison between Phase-Shift Full-Bridge Converters with Noncoupled and Coupled Current-Doubler Rectifier |
title_short | Comparison between Phase-Shift Full-Bridge Converters with Noncoupled and Coupled Current-Doubler Rectifier |
title_sort | comparison between phase-shift full-bridge converters with noncoupled and coupled current-doubler rectifier |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3870875/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24381521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/621896 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tsaichengtao comparisonbetweenphaseshiftfullbridgeconverterswithnoncoupledandcoupledcurrentdoublerrectifier AT sujyechau comparisonbetweenphaseshiftfullbridgeconverterswithnoncoupledandcoupledcurrentdoublerrectifier AT tsengshengyu comparisonbetweenphaseshiftfullbridgeconverterswithnoncoupledandcoupledcurrentdoublerrectifier |