Cargando…

Comparison between Phase-Shift Full-Bridge Converters with Noncoupled and Coupled Current-Doubler Rectifier

This paper presents comparison between phase-shift full-bridge converters with noncoupled and coupled current-doubler rectifier. In high current capability and high step-down voltage conversion, a phase-shift full-bridge converter with a conventional current-doubler rectifier has the common limitati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tsai, Cheng-Tao, Su, Jye-Chau, Tseng, Sheng-Yu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3870875/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24381521
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/621896
_version_ 1782296740607557632
author Tsai, Cheng-Tao
Su, Jye-Chau
Tseng, Sheng-Yu
author_facet Tsai, Cheng-Tao
Su, Jye-Chau
Tseng, Sheng-Yu
author_sort Tsai, Cheng-Tao
collection PubMed
description This paper presents comparison between phase-shift full-bridge converters with noncoupled and coupled current-doubler rectifier. In high current capability and high step-down voltage conversion, a phase-shift full-bridge converter with a conventional current-doubler rectifier has the common limitations of extremely low duty ratio and high component stresses. To overcome these limitations, a phase-shift full-bridge converter with a noncoupled current-doubler rectifier (NCDR) or a coupled current-doubler rectifier (CCDR) is, respectively, proposed and implemented. In this study, performance analysis and efficiency obtained from a 500 W phase-shift full-bridge converter with two improved current-doubler rectifiers are presented and compared. From their prototypes, experimental results have verified that the phase-shift full-bridge converter with NCDR has optimal duty ratio, lower component stresses, and output current ripple. In component count and efficiency comparison, CCDR has fewer components and higher efficiency at full load condition. For small size and high efficiency requirements, CCDR is relatively suitable for high step-down voltage and high efficiency applications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3870875
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38708752013-12-31 Comparison between Phase-Shift Full-Bridge Converters with Noncoupled and Coupled Current-Doubler Rectifier Tsai, Cheng-Tao Su, Jye-Chau Tseng, Sheng-Yu ScientificWorldJournal Research Article This paper presents comparison between phase-shift full-bridge converters with noncoupled and coupled current-doubler rectifier. In high current capability and high step-down voltage conversion, a phase-shift full-bridge converter with a conventional current-doubler rectifier has the common limitations of extremely low duty ratio and high component stresses. To overcome these limitations, a phase-shift full-bridge converter with a noncoupled current-doubler rectifier (NCDR) or a coupled current-doubler rectifier (CCDR) is, respectively, proposed and implemented. In this study, performance analysis and efficiency obtained from a 500 W phase-shift full-bridge converter with two improved current-doubler rectifiers are presented and compared. From their prototypes, experimental results have verified that the phase-shift full-bridge converter with NCDR has optimal duty ratio, lower component stresses, and output current ripple. In component count and efficiency comparison, CCDR has fewer components and higher efficiency at full load condition. For small size and high efficiency requirements, CCDR is relatively suitable for high step-down voltage and high efficiency applications. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3870875/ /pubmed/24381521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/621896 Text en Copyright © 2013 Cheng-Tao Tsai et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tsai, Cheng-Tao
Su, Jye-Chau
Tseng, Sheng-Yu
Comparison between Phase-Shift Full-Bridge Converters with Noncoupled and Coupled Current-Doubler Rectifier
title Comparison between Phase-Shift Full-Bridge Converters with Noncoupled and Coupled Current-Doubler Rectifier
title_full Comparison between Phase-Shift Full-Bridge Converters with Noncoupled and Coupled Current-Doubler Rectifier
title_fullStr Comparison between Phase-Shift Full-Bridge Converters with Noncoupled and Coupled Current-Doubler Rectifier
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between Phase-Shift Full-Bridge Converters with Noncoupled and Coupled Current-Doubler Rectifier
title_short Comparison between Phase-Shift Full-Bridge Converters with Noncoupled and Coupled Current-Doubler Rectifier
title_sort comparison between phase-shift full-bridge converters with noncoupled and coupled current-doubler rectifier
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3870875/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24381521
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/621896
work_keys_str_mv AT tsaichengtao comparisonbetweenphaseshiftfullbridgeconverterswithnoncoupledandcoupledcurrentdoublerrectifier
AT sujyechau comparisonbetweenphaseshiftfullbridgeconverterswithnoncoupledandcoupledcurrentdoublerrectifier
AT tsengshengyu comparisonbetweenphaseshiftfullbridgeconverterswithnoncoupledandcoupledcurrentdoublerrectifier