Cargando…
Induction of neuroplasticity and recovery in post-stroke aphasia by non-invasive brain stimulation
Stroke victims tend to prioritize speaking, writing, and walking as the three most important rehabilitation goals. Of note is that two of these goals involve communication. This underscores the significance of developing successful approaches to aphasia treatment for the several hundred thousand new...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3870921/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24399952 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00888 |
_version_ | 1782296742640746496 |
---|---|
author | Shah, Priyanka P. Szaflarski, Jerzy P. Allendorfer, Jane Hamilton, Roy H. |
author_facet | Shah, Priyanka P. Szaflarski, Jerzy P. Allendorfer, Jane Hamilton, Roy H. |
author_sort | Shah, Priyanka P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Stroke victims tend to prioritize speaking, writing, and walking as the three most important rehabilitation goals. Of note is that two of these goals involve communication. This underscores the significance of developing successful approaches to aphasia treatment for the several hundred thousand new aphasia patients each year and over 1 million stroke survivors with chronic aphasia in the U.S. alone. After several years of growth as a research tool, non-invasive brain stimulation (NBS) is gradually entering the arena of clinical aphasiology. In this review, we first examine the current state of knowledge of post-stroke language recovery including the contributions from the dominant and non-dominant hemispheres. Next, we briefly discuss the methods and the physiologic basis of the use of inhibitory and excitatory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) as research tools in patients who experience post-stroke aphasia. Finally, we provide a critical review of the most influential evidence behind the potential use of these two brain stimulation methods as clinical rehabilitative tools. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3870921 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38709212014-01-07 Induction of neuroplasticity and recovery in post-stroke aphasia by non-invasive brain stimulation Shah, Priyanka P. Szaflarski, Jerzy P. Allendorfer, Jane Hamilton, Roy H. Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Stroke victims tend to prioritize speaking, writing, and walking as the three most important rehabilitation goals. Of note is that two of these goals involve communication. This underscores the significance of developing successful approaches to aphasia treatment for the several hundred thousand new aphasia patients each year and over 1 million stroke survivors with chronic aphasia in the U.S. alone. After several years of growth as a research tool, non-invasive brain stimulation (NBS) is gradually entering the arena of clinical aphasiology. In this review, we first examine the current state of knowledge of post-stroke language recovery including the contributions from the dominant and non-dominant hemispheres. Next, we briefly discuss the methods and the physiologic basis of the use of inhibitory and excitatory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) as research tools in patients who experience post-stroke aphasia. Finally, we provide a critical review of the most influential evidence behind the potential use of these two brain stimulation methods as clinical rehabilitative tools. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3870921/ /pubmed/24399952 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00888 Text en Copyright © 2013 Shah, Szaflarski, Allendorfer and Hamilton. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Shah, Priyanka P. Szaflarski, Jerzy P. Allendorfer, Jane Hamilton, Roy H. Induction of neuroplasticity and recovery in post-stroke aphasia by non-invasive brain stimulation |
title | Induction of neuroplasticity and recovery in post-stroke aphasia by non-invasive brain stimulation |
title_full | Induction of neuroplasticity and recovery in post-stroke aphasia by non-invasive brain stimulation |
title_fullStr | Induction of neuroplasticity and recovery in post-stroke aphasia by non-invasive brain stimulation |
title_full_unstemmed | Induction of neuroplasticity and recovery in post-stroke aphasia by non-invasive brain stimulation |
title_short | Induction of neuroplasticity and recovery in post-stroke aphasia by non-invasive brain stimulation |
title_sort | induction of neuroplasticity and recovery in post-stroke aphasia by non-invasive brain stimulation |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3870921/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24399952 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00888 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shahpriyankap inductionofneuroplasticityandrecoveryinpoststrokeaphasiabynoninvasivebrainstimulation AT szaflarskijerzyp inductionofneuroplasticityandrecoveryinpoststrokeaphasiabynoninvasivebrainstimulation AT allendorferjane inductionofneuroplasticityandrecoveryinpoststrokeaphasiabynoninvasivebrainstimulation AT hamiltonroyh inductionofneuroplasticityandrecoveryinpoststrokeaphasiabynoninvasivebrainstimulation |