Cargando…

Integration and relative value of biomarkers for prediction of MCI to AD progression: Spatial patterns of brain atrophy, cognitive scores, APOE genotype and CSF biomarkers()()

This study evaluates the individual, as well as relative and joint value of indices obtained from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) patterns of brain atrophy (quantified by the SPARE-AD index), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers, APOE genotype, and cognitive performance (ADAS-Cog) in progression fr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Da, Xiao, Toledo, Jon B., Zee, Jarcy, Wolk, David A., Xie, Sharon X., Ou, Yangming, Shacklett, Amanda, Parmpi, Paraskevi, Shaw, Leslie, Trojanowski, John Q., Davatzikos, Christos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3871290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24371799
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2013.11.010
_version_ 1782296795043332096
author Da, Xiao
Toledo, Jon B.
Zee, Jarcy
Wolk, David A.
Xie, Sharon X.
Ou, Yangming
Shacklett, Amanda
Parmpi, Paraskevi
Shaw, Leslie
Trojanowski, John Q.
Davatzikos, Christos
author_facet Da, Xiao
Toledo, Jon B.
Zee, Jarcy
Wolk, David A.
Xie, Sharon X.
Ou, Yangming
Shacklett, Amanda
Parmpi, Paraskevi
Shaw, Leslie
Trojanowski, John Q.
Davatzikos, Christos
author_sort Da, Xiao
collection PubMed
description This study evaluates the individual, as well as relative and joint value of indices obtained from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) patterns of brain atrophy (quantified by the SPARE-AD index), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers, APOE genotype, and cognitive performance (ADAS-Cog) in progression from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to Alzheimer's disease (AD) within a variable follow-up period up to 6 years, using data from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative-1 (ADNI-1). SPARE-AD was first established as a highly sensitive and specific MRI-marker of AD vs. cognitively normal (CN) subjects (AUC = 0.98). Baseline predictive values of all aforementioned indices were then compared using survival analysis on 381 MCI subjects. SPARE-AD and ADAS-Cog were found to have similar predictive value, and their combination was significantly better than their individual performance. APOE genotype did not significantly improve prediction, although the combination of SPARE-AD, ADAS-Cog and APOE ε4 provided the highest hazard ratio estimates of 17.8 (last vs. first quartile). In a subset of 192 MCI patients who also had CSF biomarkers, the addition of Aβ(1–42), t-tau, and p-tau(181p) to the previous model did not improve predictive value significantly over SPARE-AD and ADAS-Cog combined. Importantly, in amyloid-negative patients with MCI, SPARE-AD had high predictive power of clinical progression. Our findings suggest that SPARE-AD and ADAS-Cog in combination offer the highest predictive power of conversion from MCI to AD, which is improved, albeit not significantly, by APOE genotype. The finding that SPARE-AD in amyloid-negative MCI patients was predictive of clinical progression is not expected under the amyloid hypothesis and merits further investigation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3871290
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38712902013-12-26 Integration and relative value of biomarkers for prediction of MCI to AD progression: Spatial patterns of brain atrophy, cognitive scores, APOE genotype and CSF biomarkers()() Da, Xiao Toledo, Jon B. Zee, Jarcy Wolk, David A. Xie, Sharon X. Ou, Yangming Shacklett, Amanda Parmpi, Paraskevi Shaw, Leslie Trojanowski, John Q. Davatzikos, Christos Neuroimage Clin Article This study evaluates the individual, as well as relative and joint value of indices obtained from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) patterns of brain atrophy (quantified by the SPARE-AD index), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers, APOE genotype, and cognitive performance (ADAS-Cog) in progression from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to Alzheimer's disease (AD) within a variable follow-up period up to 6 years, using data from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative-1 (ADNI-1). SPARE-AD was first established as a highly sensitive and specific MRI-marker of AD vs. cognitively normal (CN) subjects (AUC = 0.98). Baseline predictive values of all aforementioned indices were then compared using survival analysis on 381 MCI subjects. SPARE-AD and ADAS-Cog were found to have similar predictive value, and their combination was significantly better than their individual performance. APOE genotype did not significantly improve prediction, although the combination of SPARE-AD, ADAS-Cog and APOE ε4 provided the highest hazard ratio estimates of 17.8 (last vs. first quartile). In a subset of 192 MCI patients who also had CSF biomarkers, the addition of Aβ(1–42), t-tau, and p-tau(181p) to the previous model did not improve predictive value significantly over SPARE-AD and ADAS-Cog combined. Importantly, in amyloid-negative patients with MCI, SPARE-AD had high predictive power of clinical progression. Our findings suggest that SPARE-AD and ADAS-Cog in combination offer the highest predictive power of conversion from MCI to AD, which is improved, albeit not significantly, by APOE genotype. The finding that SPARE-AD in amyloid-negative MCI patients was predictive of clinical progression is not expected under the amyloid hypothesis and merits further investigation. Elsevier 2013-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3871290/ /pubmed/24371799 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2013.11.010 Text en © 2013 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Da, Xiao
Toledo, Jon B.
Zee, Jarcy
Wolk, David A.
Xie, Sharon X.
Ou, Yangming
Shacklett, Amanda
Parmpi, Paraskevi
Shaw, Leslie
Trojanowski, John Q.
Davatzikos, Christos
Integration and relative value of biomarkers for prediction of MCI to AD progression: Spatial patterns of brain atrophy, cognitive scores, APOE genotype and CSF biomarkers()()
title Integration and relative value of biomarkers for prediction of MCI to AD progression: Spatial patterns of brain atrophy, cognitive scores, APOE genotype and CSF biomarkers()()
title_full Integration and relative value of biomarkers for prediction of MCI to AD progression: Spatial patterns of brain atrophy, cognitive scores, APOE genotype and CSF biomarkers()()
title_fullStr Integration and relative value of biomarkers for prediction of MCI to AD progression: Spatial patterns of brain atrophy, cognitive scores, APOE genotype and CSF biomarkers()()
title_full_unstemmed Integration and relative value of biomarkers for prediction of MCI to AD progression: Spatial patterns of brain atrophy, cognitive scores, APOE genotype and CSF biomarkers()()
title_short Integration and relative value of biomarkers for prediction of MCI to AD progression: Spatial patterns of brain atrophy, cognitive scores, APOE genotype and CSF biomarkers()()
title_sort integration and relative value of biomarkers for prediction of mci to ad progression: spatial patterns of brain atrophy, cognitive scores, apoe genotype and csf biomarkers()()
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3871290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24371799
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2013.11.010
work_keys_str_mv AT daxiao integrationandrelativevalueofbiomarkersforpredictionofmcitoadprogressionspatialpatternsofbrainatrophycognitivescoresapoegenotypeandcsfbiomarkers
AT toledojonb integrationandrelativevalueofbiomarkersforpredictionofmcitoadprogressionspatialpatternsofbrainatrophycognitivescoresapoegenotypeandcsfbiomarkers
AT zeejarcy integrationandrelativevalueofbiomarkersforpredictionofmcitoadprogressionspatialpatternsofbrainatrophycognitivescoresapoegenotypeandcsfbiomarkers
AT wolkdavida integrationandrelativevalueofbiomarkersforpredictionofmcitoadprogressionspatialpatternsofbrainatrophycognitivescoresapoegenotypeandcsfbiomarkers
AT xiesharonx integrationandrelativevalueofbiomarkersforpredictionofmcitoadprogressionspatialpatternsofbrainatrophycognitivescoresapoegenotypeandcsfbiomarkers
AT ouyangming integrationandrelativevalueofbiomarkersforpredictionofmcitoadprogressionspatialpatternsofbrainatrophycognitivescoresapoegenotypeandcsfbiomarkers
AT shacklettamanda integrationandrelativevalueofbiomarkersforpredictionofmcitoadprogressionspatialpatternsofbrainatrophycognitivescoresapoegenotypeandcsfbiomarkers
AT parmpiparaskevi integrationandrelativevalueofbiomarkersforpredictionofmcitoadprogressionspatialpatternsofbrainatrophycognitivescoresapoegenotypeandcsfbiomarkers
AT shawleslie integrationandrelativevalueofbiomarkersforpredictionofmcitoadprogressionspatialpatternsofbrainatrophycognitivescoresapoegenotypeandcsfbiomarkers
AT trojanowskijohnq integrationandrelativevalueofbiomarkersforpredictionofmcitoadprogressionspatialpatternsofbrainatrophycognitivescoresapoegenotypeandcsfbiomarkers
AT davatzikoschristos integrationandrelativevalueofbiomarkersforpredictionofmcitoadprogressionspatialpatternsofbrainatrophycognitivescoresapoegenotypeandcsfbiomarkers
AT integrationandrelativevalueofbiomarkersforpredictionofmcitoadprogressionspatialpatternsofbrainatrophycognitivescoresapoegenotypeandcsfbiomarkers