Cargando…

The vortex formation time to diastolic function relation: assessment of pseudonormalized versus normal filling

In early diastole, the suction pump feature of the left ventricle opens the mitral valve and aspirates atrial blood. The ventricle fills via a blunt profiled cylindrical jet of blood that forms an asymmetric toroidal vortex ring inside the ventricle whose growth has been quantified by the standard (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ghosh, Erina, Kovács, Sándor J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3871482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24400169
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/phy2.170
_version_ 1782296820025655296
author Ghosh, Erina
Kovács, Sándor J
author_facet Ghosh, Erina
Kovács, Sándor J
author_sort Ghosh, Erina
collection PubMed
description In early diastole, the suction pump feature of the left ventricle opens the mitral valve and aspirates atrial blood. The ventricle fills via a blunt profiled cylindrical jet of blood that forms an asymmetric toroidal vortex ring inside the ventricle whose growth has been quantified by the standard (dimensionless) expression for vortex formation time, VFT(standard) = {transmitral velocity time integral}/{mitral orifice diameter}. It can differentiate between hearts having distinguishable early transmitral (Doppler E-wave) filling patterns. An alternative validated expression, VFT(kinematic) reexpresses VFT(standard) by incorporating left heart, near “constant-volume pump” physiology thereby revealing VFT(kinematic)'s explicit dependence on maximum rate of longitudinal chamber expansion (E′). In this work, we show that VFT(kinematic) can differentiate between hearts having indistinguishable E-wave patterns, such as pseudonormal (PN; 0.75 < E/A < 1.5 and E/E′ > 8) versus normal. Thirteen age-matched normal and 12 PN data sets (738 total cardiac cycles), all having normal LVEF, were selected from our Cardiovascular Biophysics Laboratory database. Doppler E-, lateral annular E′-waves, and M-mode data (mitral leaflet separation, chamber dimension) was used to compute VFT(standard) and VFT(kinematic). VFT(standard) did not differentiate between groups (normal [3.58 ± 1.06] vs. PN [4.18 ± 0.79], P = 0.13). In comparison, VFT(kinematic) for normal (3.15 ± 1.28) versus PN (4.75 ± 1.35) yielded P = 0.006. Hence, the applicability of VFT(kinematic) for diastolic function quantitation has been broadened to include analysis of PN filling patterns in age-matched groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3871482
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38714822014-01-07 The vortex formation time to diastolic function relation: assessment of pseudonormalized versus normal filling Ghosh, Erina Kovács, Sándor J Physiol Rep Original Research In early diastole, the suction pump feature of the left ventricle opens the mitral valve and aspirates atrial blood. The ventricle fills via a blunt profiled cylindrical jet of blood that forms an asymmetric toroidal vortex ring inside the ventricle whose growth has been quantified by the standard (dimensionless) expression for vortex formation time, VFT(standard) = {transmitral velocity time integral}/{mitral orifice diameter}. It can differentiate between hearts having distinguishable early transmitral (Doppler E-wave) filling patterns. An alternative validated expression, VFT(kinematic) reexpresses VFT(standard) by incorporating left heart, near “constant-volume pump” physiology thereby revealing VFT(kinematic)'s explicit dependence on maximum rate of longitudinal chamber expansion (E′). In this work, we show that VFT(kinematic) can differentiate between hearts having indistinguishable E-wave patterns, such as pseudonormal (PN; 0.75 < E/A < 1.5 and E/E′ > 8) versus normal. Thirteen age-matched normal and 12 PN data sets (738 total cardiac cycles), all having normal LVEF, were selected from our Cardiovascular Biophysics Laboratory database. Doppler E-, lateral annular E′-waves, and M-mode data (mitral leaflet separation, chamber dimension) was used to compute VFT(standard) and VFT(kinematic). VFT(standard) did not differentiate between groups (normal [3.58 ± 1.06] vs. PN [4.18 ± 0.79], P = 0.13). In comparison, VFT(kinematic) for normal (3.15 ± 1.28) versus PN (4.75 ± 1.35) yielded P = 0.006. Hence, the applicability of VFT(kinematic) for diastolic function quantitation has been broadened to include analysis of PN filling patterns in age-matched groups. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2013-11 2013-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3871482/ /pubmed/24400169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/phy2.170 Text en © 2013 The Authors. Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American Physiological Society and The Physiological Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation.
spellingShingle Original Research
Ghosh, Erina
Kovács, Sándor J
The vortex formation time to diastolic function relation: assessment of pseudonormalized versus normal filling
title The vortex formation time to diastolic function relation: assessment of pseudonormalized versus normal filling
title_full The vortex formation time to diastolic function relation: assessment of pseudonormalized versus normal filling
title_fullStr The vortex formation time to diastolic function relation: assessment of pseudonormalized versus normal filling
title_full_unstemmed The vortex formation time to diastolic function relation: assessment of pseudonormalized versus normal filling
title_short The vortex formation time to diastolic function relation: assessment of pseudonormalized versus normal filling
title_sort vortex formation time to diastolic function relation: assessment of pseudonormalized versus normal filling
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3871482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24400169
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/phy2.170
work_keys_str_mv AT ghosherina thevortexformationtimetodiastolicfunctionrelationassessmentofpseudonormalizedversusnormalfilling
AT kovacssandorj thevortexformationtimetodiastolicfunctionrelationassessmentofpseudonormalizedversusnormalfilling
AT ghosherina vortexformationtimetodiastolicfunctionrelationassessmentofpseudonormalizedversusnormalfilling
AT kovacssandorj vortexformationtimetodiastolicfunctionrelationassessmentofpseudonormalizedversusnormalfilling