Cargando…

Evaluating a new surgical dosage calculation method for esotropia

PURPOSE: To evaluate a simplified method for correction of ocular deviation in patients of infantile and acquired basic esotropia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six consecutive patients of infantile and acquired basic esotropia were selected for this study. Patients underwent unilateral recession–re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Agrawal, Siddharth, Singh, Vinita, Gupta, Sanjiv Kumar, Agrawal, Saurabh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3872565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24379550
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-620X.122270
_version_ 1782296978608095232
author Agrawal, Siddharth
Singh, Vinita
Gupta, Sanjiv Kumar
Agrawal, Saurabh
author_facet Agrawal, Siddharth
Singh, Vinita
Gupta, Sanjiv Kumar
Agrawal, Saurabh
author_sort Agrawal, Siddharth
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate a simplified method for correction of ocular deviation in patients of infantile and acquired basic esotropia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six consecutive patients of infantile and acquired basic esotropia were selected for this study. Patients underwent unilateral recession–resection surgery as per the new norm gram. Patients underwent 3.5-7 mm recession of medial rectus (MR) in one eye depending on the pre-operative deviation and patient's age. Together they also underwent 6 or 7 mm resection of the lateral rectus (LR) in the same eye depending on patient's age (6 mm for 3 years and below and 7 mm for older age). In patients 3 years and below, a correction of 6, 7, or 8 PD/mm of recession of MR was expected when the pre-operative deviation was lesser than 30 PD, between 30 and 60 PD, or above 60 PD, respectively. Similarly, these values were 5, 6, and 7 PD/mm of MR recession in patients above 3 years. A ratio between achieved and expected correction was calculated and the calculation was deemed successful for a patient if this ratio fell between 0.9 and 1.1. METHODS: Thirty-six consecutive patients of infantile and acquired basic esotropia were selected for this study. Patients underwent unilateral recession-resection surgery as per the new norm gram. Patients underwent 3.5-7 mm recession of medial rectus (MR) in one eye depending on the pre-operative deviation and patient's age. Together they also underwent 6 or 7 mm resection of the lateral rectus (LR) in the same eye depending on patient's age (6 mm for 3 years and below and 7 mm for older age). In patients 3 years and below, a correction of 6, 7, or 8 PD/mm of recession of MR was expected when the pre-operative deviation was lesser than 30 PD, between 30 and 60 PD, or above 60 PD, respectively. Similarly, these values were 5, 6, and 7 PD/mm of MR recession in patients above 3 years. A ratio between achieved and expected correction was calculated and the calculation was deemed successful for a patient if this ratio fell between 0.9 and 1.1. RESULTS: The calculation procedure was successful in 33 out of 36 patients (91%). The two-tailed probability on paired Wilcoxon test was 0.187. CONCLUSIONS: This simplified method of surgical dosage calculation using MR recession as basis is predictable in patients of infantile and basic Esotropia. It may serve as a useful tool for minimizing variability of surgical results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3872565
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38725652013-12-30 Evaluating a new surgical dosage calculation method for esotropia Agrawal, Siddharth Singh, Vinita Gupta, Sanjiv Kumar Agrawal, Saurabh Oman J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: To evaluate a simplified method for correction of ocular deviation in patients of infantile and acquired basic esotropia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six consecutive patients of infantile and acquired basic esotropia were selected for this study. Patients underwent unilateral recession–resection surgery as per the new norm gram. Patients underwent 3.5-7 mm recession of medial rectus (MR) in one eye depending on the pre-operative deviation and patient's age. Together they also underwent 6 or 7 mm resection of the lateral rectus (LR) in the same eye depending on patient's age (6 mm for 3 years and below and 7 mm for older age). In patients 3 years and below, a correction of 6, 7, or 8 PD/mm of recession of MR was expected when the pre-operative deviation was lesser than 30 PD, between 30 and 60 PD, or above 60 PD, respectively. Similarly, these values were 5, 6, and 7 PD/mm of MR recession in patients above 3 years. A ratio between achieved and expected correction was calculated and the calculation was deemed successful for a patient if this ratio fell between 0.9 and 1.1. METHODS: Thirty-six consecutive patients of infantile and acquired basic esotropia were selected for this study. Patients underwent unilateral recession-resection surgery as per the new norm gram. Patients underwent 3.5-7 mm recession of medial rectus (MR) in one eye depending on the pre-operative deviation and patient's age. Together they also underwent 6 or 7 mm resection of the lateral rectus (LR) in the same eye depending on patient's age (6 mm for 3 years and below and 7 mm for older age). In patients 3 years and below, a correction of 6, 7, or 8 PD/mm of recession of MR was expected when the pre-operative deviation was lesser than 30 PD, between 30 and 60 PD, or above 60 PD, respectively. Similarly, these values were 5, 6, and 7 PD/mm of MR recession in patients above 3 years. A ratio between achieved and expected correction was calculated and the calculation was deemed successful for a patient if this ratio fell between 0.9 and 1.1. RESULTS: The calculation procedure was successful in 33 out of 36 patients (91%). The two-tailed probability on paired Wilcoxon test was 0.187. CONCLUSIONS: This simplified method of surgical dosage calculation using MR recession as basis is predictable in patients of infantile and basic Esotropia. It may serve as a useful tool for minimizing variability of surgical results. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3872565/ /pubmed/24379550 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-620X.122270 Text en Copyright: © 2013 Agrawal S, et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Agrawal, Siddharth
Singh, Vinita
Gupta, Sanjiv Kumar
Agrawal, Saurabh
Evaluating a new surgical dosage calculation method for esotropia
title Evaluating a new surgical dosage calculation method for esotropia
title_full Evaluating a new surgical dosage calculation method for esotropia
title_fullStr Evaluating a new surgical dosage calculation method for esotropia
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating a new surgical dosage calculation method for esotropia
title_short Evaluating a new surgical dosage calculation method for esotropia
title_sort evaluating a new surgical dosage calculation method for esotropia
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3872565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24379550
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-620X.122270
work_keys_str_mv AT agrawalsiddharth evaluatinganewsurgicaldosagecalculationmethodforesotropia
AT singhvinita evaluatinganewsurgicaldosagecalculationmethodforesotropia
AT guptasanjivkumar evaluatinganewsurgicaldosagecalculationmethodforesotropia
AT agrawalsaurabh evaluatinganewsurgicaldosagecalculationmethodforesotropia