Cargando…

Unintentionality of affective attention across visual processing stages

Affective attention involves bottom-up perceptual selection that prioritizes motivationally significant stimuli. To clarify the extent to which this process is automatic, we investigated the dependence of affective attention on the intention to process emotional meaning. Affective attention was mani...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Uusberg, Andero, Uibo, Helen, Kreegipuu, Kairi, Tamm, Maria, Raidvee, Aire, Allik, Jüri
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3872777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24421772
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00969
_version_ 1782297020077178880
author Uusberg, Andero
Uibo, Helen
Kreegipuu, Kairi
Tamm, Maria
Raidvee, Aire
Allik, Jüri
author_facet Uusberg, Andero
Uibo, Helen
Kreegipuu, Kairi
Tamm, Maria
Raidvee, Aire
Allik, Jüri
author_sort Uusberg, Andero
collection PubMed
description Affective attention involves bottom-up perceptual selection that prioritizes motivationally significant stimuli. To clarify the extent to which this process is automatic, we investigated the dependence of affective attention on the intention to process emotional meaning. Affective attention was manipulated by presenting affective images with variable arousal and intentionality by requiring participants to make affective and non-affective evaluations. Polytomous rather than binary decisions were required from the participants in order to elicit relatively deep emotional processing. The temporal dynamics of prioritized processing were assessed using early posterior negativity (EPN, 175–300 ms) as well as P3-like (P3, 300–500 ms) and slow wave (SW, 500–1500 ms) portions of the late positive potential. All analyzed components were differentially sensitive to stimulus categories suggesting that they indeed reflect distinct stages of motivational significance encoding. The intention to perceive emotional meaning had no effect on EPN, an additive effect on P3, and an interactive effect on SW. We concluded that affective attention went from completely unintentional during the EPN to partially unintentional during P3 and SW where top-down signals, respectively, complemented and modulated bottom-up differences in stimulus prioritization. The findings were interpreted in light of two-stage models of visual perception by associating the EPN with large-capacity initial relevance detection and the P3 as well as SW with capacity-limited consolidation and elaboration of affective stimuli.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3872777
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38727772014-01-13 Unintentionality of affective attention across visual processing stages Uusberg, Andero Uibo, Helen Kreegipuu, Kairi Tamm, Maria Raidvee, Aire Allik, Jüri Front Psychol Psychology Affective attention involves bottom-up perceptual selection that prioritizes motivationally significant stimuli. To clarify the extent to which this process is automatic, we investigated the dependence of affective attention on the intention to process emotional meaning. Affective attention was manipulated by presenting affective images with variable arousal and intentionality by requiring participants to make affective and non-affective evaluations. Polytomous rather than binary decisions were required from the participants in order to elicit relatively deep emotional processing. The temporal dynamics of prioritized processing were assessed using early posterior negativity (EPN, 175–300 ms) as well as P3-like (P3, 300–500 ms) and slow wave (SW, 500–1500 ms) portions of the late positive potential. All analyzed components were differentially sensitive to stimulus categories suggesting that they indeed reflect distinct stages of motivational significance encoding. The intention to perceive emotional meaning had no effect on EPN, an additive effect on P3, and an interactive effect on SW. We concluded that affective attention went from completely unintentional during the EPN to partially unintentional during P3 and SW where top-down signals, respectively, complemented and modulated bottom-up differences in stimulus prioritization. The findings were interpreted in light of two-stage models of visual perception by associating the EPN with large-capacity initial relevance detection and the P3 as well as SW with capacity-limited consolidation and elaboration of affective stimuli. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-12-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3872777/ /pubmed/24421772 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00969 Text en Copyright © 2013 Uusberg, Uibo, Kreegipuu, Tamm, Raidvee and Allik. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Uusberg, Andero
Uibo, Helen
Kreegipuu, Kairi
Tamm, Maria
Raidvee, Aire
Allik, Jüri
Unintentionality of affective attention across visual processing stages
title Unintentionality of affective attention across visual processing stages
title_full Unintentionality of affective attention across visual processing stages
title_fullStr Unintentionality of affective attention across visual processing stages
title_full_unstemmed Unintentionality of affective attention across visual processing stages
title_short Unintentionality of affective attention across visual processing stages
title_sort unintentionality of affective attention across visual processing stages
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3872777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24421772
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00969
work_keys_str_mv AT uusbergandero unintentionalityofaffectiveattentionacrossvisualprocessingstages
AT uibohelen unintentionalityofaffectiveattentionacrossvisualprocessingstages
AT kreegipuukairi unintentionalityofaffectiveattentionacrossvisualprocessingstages
AT tammmaria unintentionalityofaffectiveattentionacrossvisualprocessingstages
AT raidveeaire unintentionalityofaffectiveattentionacrossvisualprocessingstages
AT allikjuri unintentionalityofaffectiveattentionacrossvisualprocessingstages