Cargando…

Optimal Dose Levels in Screening Chest CT for Unimpaired Detection and Volumetry of Lung Nodules, with and without Computer Assisted Detection at Minimal Patient Radiation

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this phantom study was to minimize the radiation dose by finding the best combination of low tube current and low voltage that would result in accurate volume measurements when compared to standard CT imaging without significantly decreasing the sensitivity of detecting lung n...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Christe, Andreas, Szucs-Farkas, Zsolt, Huber, Adrian, Steiger, Philipp, Leidolt, Lars, Roos, Justus E., Heverhagen, Johannes, Ebner, Lukas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3873253/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24386126
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082919
_version_ 1782297078627565568
author Christe, Andreas
Szucs-Farkas, Zsolt
Huber, Adrian
Steiger, Philipp
Leidolt, Lars
Roos, Justus E.
Heverhagen, Johannes
Ebner, Lukas
author_facet Christe, Andreas
Szucs-Farkas, Zsolt
Huber, Adrian
Steiger, Philipp
Leidolt, Lars
Roos, Justus E.
Heverhagen, Johannes
Ebner, Lukas
author_sort Christe, Andreas
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of this phantom study was to minimize the radiation dose by finding the best combination of low tube current and low voltage that would result in accurate volume measurements when compared to standard CT imaging without significantly decreasing the sensitivity of detecting lung nodules both with and without the assistance of CAD. METHODS: An anthropomorphic chest phantom containing artificial solid and ground glass nodules (GGNs, 5–12 mm) was examined with a 64-row multi-detector CT scanner with three tube currents of 100, 50 and 25 mAs in combination with three tube voltages of 120, 100 and 80 kVp. This resulted in eight different protocols that were then compared to standard CT sensitivity (100 mAs/120 kVp). For each protocol, at least 127 different nodules were scanned in 21–25 phantoms. The nodules were analyzed in two separate sessions by three independent, blinded radiologists and computer-aided detection (CAD) software. RESULTS: The mean sensitivity of the radiologists for identifying solid lung nodules on a standard CT was 89.7%±4.9%. The sensitivity was not significantly impaired when the tube and current voltage were lowered at the same time, except at the lowest exposure level of 25 mAs/80 kVp [80.6%±4.3% (p = 0.031)]. Compared to the standard CT, the sensitivity for detecting GGNs was significantly lower at all dose levels when the voltage was 80 kVp; this result was independent of the tube current. The CAD significantly increased the radiologists’ sensitivity for detecting solid nodules at all dose levels (5–11%). No significant volume measurement errors (VMEs) were documented for the radiologists or the CAD software at any dose level. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest a CT protocol with 25 mAs and 100 kVp is optimal for detecting solid and ground glass nodules in lung cancer screening. The use of CAD software is highly recommended at all dose levels.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3873253
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38732532014-01-02 Optimal Dose Levels in Screening Chest CT for Unimpaired Detection and Volumetry of Lung Nodules, with and without Computer Assisted Detection at Minimal Patient Radiation Christe, Andreas Szucs-Farkas, Zsolt Huber, Adrian Steiger, Philipp Leidolt, Lars Roos, Justus E. Heverhagen, Johannes Ebner, Lukas PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: The aim of this phantom study was to minimize the radiation dose by finding the best combination of low tube current and low voltage that would result in accurate volume measurements when compared to standard CT imaging without significantly decreasing the sensitivity of detecting lung nodules both with and without the assistance of CAD. METHODS: An anthropomorphic chest phantom containing artificial solid and ground glass nodules (GGNs, 5–12 mm) was examined with a 64-row multi-detector CT scanner with three tube currents of 100, 50 and 25 mAs in combination with three tube voltages of 120, 100 and 80 kVp. This resulted in eight different protocols that were then compared to standard CT sensitivity (100 mAs/120 kVp). For each protocol, at least 127 different nodules were scanned in 21–25 phantoms. The nodules were analyzed in two separate sessions by three independent, blinded radiologists and computer-aided detection (CAD) software. RESULTS: The mean sensitivity of the radiologists for identifying solid lung nodules on a standard CT was 89.7%±4.9%. The sensitivity was not significantly impaired when the tube and current voltage were lowered at the same time, except at the lowest exposure level of 25 mAs/80 kVp [80.6%±4.3% (p = 0.031)]. Compared to the standard CT, the sensitivity for detecting GGNs was significantly lower at all dose levels when the voltage was 80 kVp; this result was independent of the tube current. The CAD significantly increased the radiologists’ sensitivity for detecting solid nodules at all dose levels (5–11%). No significant volume measurement errors (VMEs) were documented for the radiologists or the CAD software at any dose level. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest a CT protocol with 25 mAs and 100 kVp is optimal for detecting solid and ground glass nodules in lung cancer screening. The use of CAD software is highly recommended at all dose levels. Public Library of Science 2013-12-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3873253/ /pubmed/24386126 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082919 Text en © 2013 Christe et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Christe, Andreas
Szucs-Farkas, Zsolt
Huber, Adrian
Steiger, Philipp
Leidolt, Lars
Roos, Justus E.
Heverhagen, Johannes
Ebner, Lukas
Optimal Dose Levels in Screening Chest CT for Unimpaired Detection and Volumetry of Lung Nodules, with and without Computer Assisted Detection at Minimal Patient Radiation
title Optimal Dose Levels in Screening Chest CT for Unimpaired Detection and Volumetry of Lung Nodules, with and without Computer Assisted Detection at Minimal Patient Radiation
title_full Optimal Dose Levels in Screening Chest CT for Unimpaired Detection and Volumetry of Lung Nodules, with and without Computer Assisted Detection at Minimal Patient Radiation
title_fullStr Optimal Dose Levels in Screening Chest CT for Unimpaired Detection and Volumetry of Lung Nodules, with and without Computer Assisted Detection at Minimal Patient Radiation
title_full_unstemmed Optimal Dose Levels in Screening Chest CT for Unimpaired Detection and Volumetry of Lung Nodules, with and without Computer Assisted Detection at Minimal Patient Radiation
title_short Optimal Dose Levels in Screening Chest CT for Unimpaired Detection and Volumetry of Lung Nodules, with and without Computer Assisted Detection at Minimal Patient Radiation
title_sort optimal dose levels in screening chest ct for unimpaired detection and volumetry of lung nodules, with and without computer assisted detection at minimal patient radiation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3873253/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24386126
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082919
work_keys_str_mv AT christeandreas optimaldoselevelsinscreeningchestctforunimpaireddetectionandvolumetryoflungnoduleswithandwithoutcomputerassisteddetectionatminimalpatientradiation
AT szucsfarkaszsolt optimaldoselevelsinscreeningchestctforunimpaireddetectionandvolumetryoflungnoduleswithandwithoutcomputerassisteddetectionatminimalpatientradiation
AT huberadrian optimaldoselevelsinscreeningchestctforunimpaireddetectionandvolumetryoflungnoduleswithandwithoutcomputerassisteddetectionatminimalpatientradiation
AT steigerphilipp optimaldoselevelsinscreeningchestctforunimpaireddetectionandvolumetryoflungnoduleswithandwithoutcomputerassisteddetectionatminimalpatientradiation
AT leidoltlars optimaldoselevelsinscreeningchestctforunimpaireddetectionandvolumetryoflungnoduleswithandwithoutcomputerassisteddetectionatminimalpatientradiation
AT roosjustuse optimaldoselevelsinscreeningchestctforunimpaireddetectionandvolumetryoflungnoduleswithandwithoutcomputerassisteddetectionatminimalpatientradiation
AT heverhagenjohannes optimaldoselevelsinscreeningchestctforunimpaireddetectionandvolumetryoflungnoduleswithandwithoutcomputerassisteddetectionatminimalpatientradiation
AT ebnerlukas optimaldoselevelsinscreeningchestctforunimpaireddetectionandvolumetryoflungnoduleswithandwithoutcomputerassisteddetectionatminimalpatientradiation