Cargando…

Pain rating schema: three distinct subgroups of individuals emerge when rating mild, moderate, and severe pain

BACKGROUND: While the validity of pain assessment has been well documented, the underlying schema (ie, organized, preconceived ideas) of how individuals interpret numerical pain ratings is not well understood. This study’s objectives were to examine numerical pain intensity ratings, from (0 to 10 cm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Frey-Law, Laura A, Lee, Jennifer E, Wittry, Alex M, Melyon, Myles
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3873848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24379696
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S52556
_version_ 1782297149186244608
author Frey-Law, Laura A
Lee, Jennifer E
Wittry, Alex M
Melyon, Myles
author_facet Frey-Law, Laura A
Lee, Jennifer E
Wittry, Alex M
Melyon, Myles
author_sort Frey-Law, Laura A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: While the validity of pain assessment has been well documented, the underlying schema (ie, organized, preconceived ideas) of how individuals interpret numerical pain ratings is not well understood. This study’s objectives were to examine numerical pain intensity ratings, from (0 to 10 cm on the visual analog scale [VAS]) across multiple severities of commonly experienced acute pain conditions to determine whether the ratings differed between these pain conditions and/or between individuals. METHODS: A community sample (N=365, 66% female) rated their anticipated pain intensity (VAS) for threshold, mild, moderate, severe, and tolerance level, using several common pain conditions: headache, toothache, joint injury, delayed-onset muscle soreness, burns, and “general pain.” RESULTS: Cluster analysis revealed three subgroups of individuals, suggesting three types of underlying pain rating schema: 1) Low Rating subgroup (low VAS pain intensity ratings across all the pain severity categories); 2) Low/High Rating subgroup (low VAS pain intensity rating for mild, but high VAS pain intensity rating for severe pain); and 3) High Rating subgroup (high VAS pain intensity ratings across all the pain severity categories). Overall, differences between pain conditions were small: muscle soreness pain intensity was consistently rated lower than the other pain types across severities. The highest pain ratings varied between joint injury and general pain, depending on severity level. No effects of sex or current experience of pain were noted. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that: 1) three distinct pain schemas were present in this community-based sample, indicating significant variation in how pain scales are utilized and/or interpreted between clusters of individuals; 2) pain ratings vary by condition, but these differences are minor; and 3) pain rating schemas are not significantly different between males and females or between individuals with and without current pain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3873848
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38738482013-12-30 Pain rating schema: three distinct subgroups of individuals emerge when rating mild, moderate, and severe pain Frey-Law, Laura A Lee, Jennifer E Wittry, Alex M Melyon, Myles J Pain Res Original Research BACKGROUND: While the validity of pain assessment has been well documented, the underlying schema (ie, organized, preconceived ideas) of how individuals interpret numerical pain ratings is not well understood. This study’s objectives were to examine numerical pain intensity ratings, from (0 to 10 cm on the visual analog scale [VAS]) across multiple severities of commonly experienced acute pain conditions to determine whether the ratings differed between these pain conditions and/or between individuals. METHODS: A community sample (N=365, 66% female) rated their anticipated pain intensity (VAS) for threshold, mild, moderate, severe, and tolerance level, using several common pain conditions: headache, toothache, joint injury, delayed-onset muscle soreness, burns, and “general pain.” RESULTS: Cluster analysis revealed three subgroups of individuals, suggesting three types of underlying pain rating schema: 1) Low Rating subgroup (low VAS pain intensity ratings across all the pain severity categories); 2) Low/High Rating subgroup (low VAS pain intensity rating for mild, but high VAS pain intensity rating for severe pain); and 3) High Rating subgroup (high VAS pain intensity ratings across all the pain severity categories). Overall, differences between pain conditions were small: muscle soreness pain intensity was consistently rated lower than the other pain types across severities. The highest pain ratings varied between joint injury and general pain, depending on severity level. No effects of sex or current experience of pain were noted. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that: 1) three distinct pain schemas were present in this community-based sample, indicating significant variation in how pain scales are utilized and/or interpreted between clusters of individuals; 2) pain ratings vary by condition, but these differences are minor; and 3) pain rating schemas are not significantly different between males and females or between individuals with and without current pain. Dove Medical Press 2013-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3873848/ /pubmed/24379696 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S52556 Text en © 2014 Frey-Law et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution — Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Frey-Law, Laura A
Lee, Jennifer E
Wittry, Alex M
Melyon, Myles
Pain rating schema: three distinct subgroups of individuals emerge when rating mild, moderate, and severe pain
title Pain rating schema: three distinct subgroups of individuals emerge when rating mild, moderate, and severe pain
title_full Pain rating schema: three distinct subgroups of individuals emerge when rating mild, moderate, and severe pain
title_fullStr Pain rating schema: three distinct subgroups of individuals emerge when rating mild, moderate, and severe pain
title_full_unstemmed Pain rating schema: three distinct subgroups of individuals emerge when rating mild, moderate, and severe pain
title_short Pain rating schema: three distinct subgroups of individuals emerge when rating mild, moderate, and severe pain
title_sort pain rating schema: three distinct subgroups of individuals emerge when rating mild, moderate, and severe pain
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3873848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24379696
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S52556
work_keys_str_mv AT freylawlauraa painratingschemathreedistinctsubgroupsofindividualsemergewhenratingmildmoderateandseverepain
AT leejennifere painratingschemathreedistinctsubgroupsofindividualsemergewhenratingmildmoderateandseverepain
AT wittryalexm painratingschemathreedistinctsubgroupsofindividualsemergewhenratingmildmoderateandseverepain
AT melyonmyles painratingschemathreedistinctsubgroupsofindividualsemergewhenratingmildmoderateandseverepain