Cargando…

Comparative Growth and Development of Spiders Reared on Live and Dead Prey

Scavenging (feeding on dead prey) has been demonstrated across a number of spider families, yet the implications of feeding on dead prey for the growth and development of individuals and population is unknown. In this study we compare the growth, development, and predatory activity of two species of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peng, Yu, Zhang, Fan, Gui, Shaolan, Qiao, Huping, Hose, Grant C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3873932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24386248
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083663
_version_ 1782297160494088192
author Peng, Yu
Zhang, Fan
Gui, Shaolan
Qiao, Huping
Hose, Grant C.
author_facet Peng, Yu
Zhang, Fan
Gui, Shaolan
Qiao, Huping
Hose, Grant C.
author_sort Peng, Yu
collection PubMed
description Scavenging (feeding on dead prey) has been demonstrated across a number of spider families, yet the implications of feeding on dead prey for the growth and development of individuals and population is unknown. In this study we compare the growth, development, and predatory activity of two species of spiders that were fed on live and dead prey. Pardosa astrigera (Lycosidae) and Hylyphantes graminicola (Lyniphiidae) were fed live or dead fruit flies, Drosophila melanogaster. The survival of P. astrigera and H. graminicola was not affected by prey type. The duration of late instars of P. astrigera fed dead prey were longer and mature spiders had less protein content than those fed live prey, whereas there were no differences in the rate of H. graminicola development, but the mass of mature spiders fed dead prey was greater than those fed live prey. Predation rates by P. astrigera did not differ between the two prey types, but H. graminicola had a higher rate of predation on dead than alive prey, presumably because the dead flies were easier to catch and handle. Overall, the growth, development and reproduction of H. graminicola reared with dead flies was better than those reared on live flies, yet for the larger P. astrigera, dead prey may suit smaller instars but mature spiders may be best maintained with live prey. We have clearly demonstrated that dead prey may be suitable for rearing spiders, although the success of the spiders fed such prey appears size- and species specific.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3873932
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38739322014-01-02 Comparative Growth and Development of Spiders Reared on Live and Dead Prey Peng, Yu Zhang, Fan Gui, Shaolan Qiao, Huping Hose, Grant C. PLoS One Research Article Scavenging (feeding on dead prey) has been demonstrated across a number of spider families, yet the implications of feeding on dead prey for the growth and development of individuals and population is unknown. In this study we compare the growth, development, and predatory activity of two species of spiders that were fed on live and dead prey. Pardosa astrigera (Lycosidae) and Hylyphantes graminicola (Lyniphiidae) were fed live or dead fruit flies, Drosophila melanogaster. The survival of P. astrigera and H. graminicola was not affected by prey type. The duration of late instars of P. astrigera fed dead prey were longer and mature spiders had less protein content than those fed live prey, whereas there were no differences in the rate of H. graminicola development, but the mass of mature spiders fed dead prey was greater than those fed live prey. Predation rates by P. astrigera did not differ between the two prey types, but H. graminicola had a higher rate of predation on dead than alive prey, presumably because the dead flies were easier to catch and handle. Overall, the growth, development and reproduction of H. graminicola reared with dead flies was better than those reared on live flies, yet for the larger P. astrigera, dead prey may suit smaller instars but mature spiders may be best maintained with live prey. We have clearly demonstrated that dead prey may be suitable for rearing spiders, although the success of the spiders fed such prey appears size- and species specific. Public Library of Science 2013-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3873932/ /pubmed/24386248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083663 Text en © 2013 Peng et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Peng, Yu
Zhang, Fan
Gui, Shaolan
Qiao, Huping
Hose, Grant C.
Comparative Growth and Development of Spiders Reared on Live and Dead Prey
title Comparative Growth and Development of Spiders Reared on Live and Dead Prey
title_full Comparative Growth and Development of Spiders Reared on Live and Dead Prey
title_fullStr Comparative Growth and Development of Spiders Reared on Live and Dead Prey
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Growth and Development of Spiders Reared on Live and Dead Prey
title_short Comparative Growth and Development of Spiders Reared on Live and Dead Prey
title_sort comparative growth and development of spiders reared on live and dead prey
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3873932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24386248
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083663
work_keys_str_mv AT pengyu comparativegrowthanddevelopmentofspidersrearedonliveanddeadprey
AT zhangfan comparativegrowthanddevelopmentofspidersrearedonliveanddeadprey
AT guishaolan comparativegrowthanddevelopmentofspidersrearedonliveanddeadprey
AT qiaohuping comparativegrowthanddevelopmentofspidersrearedonliveanddeadprey
AT hosegrantc comparativegrowthanddevelopmentofspidersrearedonliveanddeadprey