Cargando…

To be or not to be: regulation of restriction–modification systems and other toxin–antitoxin systems

One of the simplest classes of genes involved in programmed death is that containing the toxin–antitoxin (TA) systems of prokaryotes. These systems are composed of an intracellular toxin and an antitoxin that neutralizes its effect. These systems, now classified into five types, were initially disco...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mruk, Iwona, Kobayashi, Ichizo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3874152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23945938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt711
_version_ 1782297194260332544
author Mruk, Iwona
Kobayashi, Ichizo
author_facet Mruk, Iwona
Kobayashi, Ichizo
author_sort Mruk, Iwona
collection PubMed
description One of the simplest classes of genes involved in programmed death is that containing the toxin–antitoxin (TA) systems of prokaryotes. These systems are composed of an intracellular toxin and an antitoxin that neutralizes its effect. These systems, now classified into five types, were initially discovered because some of them allow the stable maintenance of mobile genetic elements in a microbial population through postsegregational killing or the death of cells that have lost these systems. Here, we demonstrate parallels between some TA systems and restriction–modification systems (RM systems). RM systems are composed of a restriction enzyme (toxin) and a modification enzyme (antitoxin) and limit the genetic flux between lineages with different epigenetic identities, as defined by sequence-specific DNA methylation. The similarities between these systems include their postsegregational killing and their effects on global gene expression. Both require the finely regulated expression of a toxin and antitoxin. The antitoxin (modification enzyme) or linked protein may act as a transcriptional regulator. A regulatory antisense RNA recently identified in an RM system can be compared with those RNAs in TA systems. This review is intended to generalize the concept of TA systems in studies of stress responses, programmed death, genetic conflict and epigenetics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3874152
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38741522013-12-28 To be or not to be: regulation of restriction–modification systems and other toxin–antitoxin systems Mruk, Iwona Kobayashi, Ichizo Nucleic Acids Res Survey and Summary One of the simplest classes of genes involved in programmed death is that containing the toxin–antitoxin (TA) systems of prokaryotes. These systems are composed of an intracellular toxin and an antitoxin that neutralizes its effect. These systems, now classified into five types, were initially discovered because some of them allow the stable maintenance of mobile genetic elements in a microbial population through postsegregational killing or the death of cells that have lost these systems. Here, we demonstrate parallels between some TA systems and restriction–modification systems (RM systems). RM systems are composed of a restriction enzyme (toxin) and a modification enzyme (antitoxin) and limit the genetic flux between lineages with different epigenetic identities, as defined by sequence-specific DNA methylation. The similarities between these systems include their postsegregational killing and their effects on global gene expression. Both require the finely regulated expression of a toxin and antitoxin. The antitoxin (modification enzyme) or linked protein may act as a transcriptional regulator. A regulatory antisense RNA recently identified in an RM system can be compared with those RNAs in TA systems. This review is intended to generalize the concept of TA systems in studies of stress responses, programmed death, genetic conflict and epigenetics. Oxford University Press 2014-01-01 2013-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3874152/ /pubmed/23945938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt711 Text en © The Author(s) 2013. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits non-commercial reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Survey and Summary
Mruk, Iwona
Kobayashi, Ichizo
To be or not to be: regulation of restriction–modification systems and other toxin–antitoxin systems
title To be or not to be: regulation of restriction–modification systems and other toxin–antitoxin systems
title_full To be or not to be: regulation of restriction–modification systems and other toxin–antitoxin systems
title_fullStr To be or not to be: regulation of restriction–modification systems and other toxin–antitoxin systems
title_full_unstemmed To be or not to be: regulation of restriction–modification systems and other toxin–antitoxin systems
title_short To be or not to be: regulation of restriction–modification systems and other toxin–antitoxin systems
title_sort to be or not to be: regulation of restriction–modification systems and other toxin–antitoxin systems
topic Survey and Summary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3874152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23945938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt711
work_keys_str_mv AT mrukiwona tobeornottoberegulationofrestrictionmodificationsystemsandothertoxinantitoxinsystems
AT kobayashiichizo tobeornottoberegulationofrestrictionmodificationsystemsandothertoxinantitoxinsystems