Cargando…

Genome sequencing: a systematic review of health economic evidence

Recently the sequencing of the human genome has become a major biological and clinical research field. However, the public health impact of this new technology with focus on the financial effect is not yet to be foreseen. To provide an overview of the current health economic evidence for genome sequ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Frank, Martin, Prenzler, Anne, Eils, Roland, Graf von der Schulenburg, J-Matthias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3874598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24330507
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2191-1991-3-29
_version_ 1782297244448325632
author Frank, Martin
Prenzler, Anne
Eils, Roland
Graf von der Schulenburg, J-Matthias
author_facet Frank, Martin
Prenzler, Anne
Eils, Roland
Graf von der Schulenburg, J-Matthias
author_sort Frank, Martin
collection PubMed
description Recently the sequencing of the human genome has become a major biological and clinical research field. However, the public health impact of this new technology with focus on the financial effect is not yet to be foreseen. To provide an overview of the current health economic evidence for genome sequencing, we conducted a thorough systematic review of the literature from 17 databases. In addition, we conducted a hand search. Starting with 5 520 records we ultimately included five full-text publications and one internet source, all focused on cost calculations. The results were very heterogeneous and, therefore, difficult to compare. Furthermore, because the methodology of the publications was quite poor, the reliability and validity of the results were questionable. The real costs for the whole sequencing workflow, including data management and analysis, remain unknown. Overall, our review indicates that the current health economic evidence for genome sequencing is quite poor. Therefore, we listed aspects that needed to be considered when conducting health economic analyses of genome sequencing. Thereby, specifics regarding the overall aim, technology, population, indication, comparator, alternatives after sequencing, outcomes, probabilities, and costs with respect to genome sequencing are discussed. For further research, at the outset, a comprehensive cost calculation of genome sequencing is needed, because all further health economic studies rely on valid cost data. The results will serve as an input parameter for budget-impact analyses or cost-effectiveness analyses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3874598
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Springer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38745982013-12-30 Genome sequencing: a systematic review of health economic evidence Frank, Martin Prenzler, Anne Eils, Roland Graf von der Schulenburg, J-Matthias Health Econ Rev Review Recently the sequencing of the human genome has become a major biological and clinical research field. However, the public health impact of this new technology with focus on the financial effect is not yet to be foreseen. To provide an overview of the current health economic evidence for genome sequencing, we conducted a thorough systematic review of the literature from 17 databases. In addition, we conducted a hand search. Starting with 5 520 records we ultimately included five full-text publications and one internet source, all focused on cost calculations. The results were very heterogeneous and, therefore, difficult to compare. Furthermore, because the methodology of the publications was quite poor, the reliability and validity of the results were questionable. The real costs for the whole sequencing workflow, including data management and analysis, remain unknown. Overall, our review indicates that the current health economic evidence for genome sequencing is quite poor. Therefore, we listed aspects that needed to be considered when conducting health economic analyses of genome sequencing. Thereby, specifics regarding the overall aim, technology, population, indication, comparator, alternatives after sequencing, outcomes, probabilities, and costs with respect to genome sequencing are discussed. For further research, at the outset, a comprehensive cost calculation of genome sequencing is needed, because all further health economic studies rely on valid cost data. The results will serve as an input parameter for budget-impact analyses or cost-effectiveness analyses. Springer 2013-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3874598/ /pubmed/24330507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2191-1991-3-29 Text en Copyright © 2013 Frank et al.; licensee Springer. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Frank, Martin
Prenzler, Anne
Eils, Roland
Graf von der Schulenburg, J-Matthias
Genome sequencing: a systematic review of health economic evidence
title Genome sequencing: a systematic review of health economic evidence
title_full Genome sequencing: a systematic review of health economic evidence
title_fullStr Genome sequencing: a systematic review of health economic evidence
title_full_unstemmed Genome sequencing: a systematic review of health economic evidence
title_short Genome sequencing: a systematic review of health economic evidence
title_sort genome sequencing: a systematic review of health economic evidence
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3874598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24330507
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2191-1991-3-29
work_keys_str_mv AT frankmartin genomesequencingasystematicreviewofhealtheconomicevidence
AT prenzleranne genomesequencingasystematicreviewofhealtheconomicevidence
AT eilsroland genomesequencingasystematicreviewofhealtheconomicevidence
AT grafvonderschulenburgjmatthias genomesequencingasystematicreviewofhealtheconomicevidence