Cargando…
A relationship between bruxism and orofacial-dystonia? A trigeminal electrophysiological approach in a case report of pineal cavernoma
BACKGROUND: In some clinical cases, bruxism may be correlated to central nervous system hyperexcitability, suggesting that bruxism may represent a subclinical form of dystonia. To examine this hypothesis, we performed an electrophysiological evaluation of the excitability of the trigeminal nervous s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3874619/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24165294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-9-41 |
_version_ | 1782297249204666368 |
---|---|
author | Frisardi, Gianni Iani, Cesare Sau, Gianfranco Frisardi, Flavio Leornadis, Carlo Lumbau, Aurea Enrico, Paolo Sirca, Donatella Staderini, Enrico Maria Chessa, Giacomo |
author_facet | Frisardi, Gianni Iani, Cesare Sau, Gianfranco Frisardi, Flavio Leornadis, Carlo Lumbau, Aurea Enrico, Paolo Sirca, Donatella Staderini, Enrico Maria Chessa, Giacomo |
author_sort | Frisardi, Gianni |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In some clinical cases, bruxism may be correlated to central nervous system hyperexcitability, suggesting that bruxism may represent a subclinical form of dystonia. To examine this hypothesis, we performed an electrophysiological evaluation of the excitability of the trigeminal nervous system in a patient affected by pineal cavernoma with pain symptoms in the orofacial region and pronounced bruxism. METHODS: Electrophysiological studies included bilateral electrical transcranial stimulation of the trigeminal roots, analysis of the jaw jerk reflex, recovery cycle of masseter inhibitory reflex, and a magnetic resonance imaging study of the brain. RESULTS: The neuromuscular responses of the left- and right-side bilateral trigeminal motor potentials showed a high degree of symmetry in latency (1.92 ms and 1.96 ms, respectively) and amplitude (11 mV and 11.4 mV, respectively), whereas the jaw jerk reflex amplitude of the right and left masseters was 5.1 mV and 8.9 mV, respectively. The test stimulus for the recovery cycle of masseter inhibitory reflex evoked both silent periods at an interstimulus interval of 150 ms. The duration of the second silent period evoked by the test stimulus was 61 ms and 54 ms on the right and left masseters, respectively, which was greater than that evoked by the conditioning stimulus (39 ms and 35 ms, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: We found evidence of activation and peripheral sensitization of the nociceptive fibers, the primary and secondary nociceptive neurons in the central nervous system, and the endogenous pain control systems (including both the inhibitory and facilitatory processes), in the tested subject. These data suggest that bruxism and central orofacial pain can coexist, but are two independent symptoms, which may explain why numerous experimental and clinical studies fail to reach unequivocal conclusions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3874619 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38746192013-12-31 A relationship between bruxism and orofacial-dystonia? A trigeminal electrophysiological approach in a case report of pineal cavernoma Frisardi, Gianni Iani, Cesare Sau, Gianfranco Frisardi, Flavio Leornadis, Carlo Lumbau, Aurea Enrico, Paolo Sirca, Donatella Staderini, Enrico Maria Chessa, Giacomo Behav Brain Funct Research BACKGROUND: In some clinical cases, bruxism may be correlated to central nervous system hyperexcitability, suggesting that bruxism may represent a subclinical form of dystonia. To examine this hypothesis, we performed an electrophysiological evaluation of the excitability of the trigeminal nervous system in a patient affected by pineal cavernoma with pain symptoms in the orofacial region and pronounced bruxism. METHODS: Electrophysiological studies included bilateral electrical transcranial stimulation of the trigeminal roots, analysis of the jaw jerk reflex, recovery cycle of masseter inhibitory reflex, and a magnetic resonance imaging study of the brain. RESULTS: The neuromuscular responses of the left- and right-side bilateral trigeminal motor potentials showed a high degree of symmetry in latency (1.92 ms and 1.96 ms, respectively) and amplitude (11 mV and 11.4 mV, respectively), whereas the jaw jerk reflex amplitude of the right and left masseters was 5.1 mV and 8.9 mV, respectively. The test stimulus for the recovery cycle of masseter inhibitory reflex evoked both silent periods at an interstimulus interval of 150 ms. The duration of the second silent period evoked by the test stimulus was 61 ms and 54 ms on the right and left masseters, respectively, which was greater than that evoked by the conditioning stimulus (39 ms and 35 ms, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: We found evidence of activation and peripheral sensitization of the nociceptive fibers, the primary and secondary nociceptive neurons in the central nervous system, and the endogenous pain control systems (including both the inhibitory and facilitatory processes), in the tested subject. These data suggest that bruxism and central orofacial pain can coexist, but are two independent symptoms, which may explain why numerous experimental and clinical studies fail to reach unequivocal conclusions. BioMed Central 2013-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3874619/ /pubmed/24165294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-9-41 Text en Copyright © 2013 Frisardi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Frisardi, Gianni Iani, Cesare Sau, Gianfranco Frisardi, Flavio Leornadis, Carlo Lumbau, Aurea Enrico, Paolo Sirca, Donatella Staderini, Enrico Maria Chessa, Giacomo A relationship between bruxism and orofacial-dystonia? A trigeminal electrophysiological approach in a case report of pineal cavernoma |
title | A relationship between bruxism and orofacial-dystonia? A trigeminal electrophysiological approach in a case report of pineal cavernoma |
title_full | A relationship between bruxism and orofacial-dystonia? A trigeminal electrophysiological approach in a case report of pineal cavernoma |
title_fullStr | A relationship between bruxism and orofacial-dystonia? A trigeminal electrophysiological approach in a case report of pineal cavernoma |
title_full_unstemmed | A relationship between bruxism and orofacial-dystonia? A trigeminal electrophysiological approach in a case report of pineal cavernoma |
title_short | A relationship between bruxism and orofacial-dystonia? A trigeminal electrophysiological approach in a case report of pineal cavernoma |
title_sort | relationship between bruxism and orofacial-dystonia? a trigeminal electrophysiological approach in a case report of pineal cavernoma |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3874619/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24165294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-9-41 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT frisardigianni arelationshipbetweenbruxismandorofacialdystoniaatrigeminalelectrophysiologicalapproachinacasereportofpinealcavernoma AT ianicesare arelationshipbetweenbruxismandorofacialdystoniaatrigeminalelectrophysiologicalapproachinacasereportofpinealcavernoma AT saugianfranco arelationshipbetweenbruxismandorofacialdystoniaatrigeminalelectrophysiologicalapproachinacasereportofpinealcavernoma AT frisardiflavio arelationshipbetweenbruxismandorofacialdystoniaatrigeminalelectrophysiologicalapproachinacasereportofpinealcavernoma AT leornadiscarlo arelationshipbetweenbruxismandorofacialdystoniaatrigeminalelectrophysiologicalapproachinacasereportofpinealcavernoma AT lumbauaurea arelationshipbetweenbruxismandorofacialdystoniaatrigeminalelectrophysiologicalapproachinacasereportofpinealcavernoma AT enricopaolo arelationshipbetweenbruxismandorofacialdystoniaatrigeminalelectrophysiologicalapproachinacasereportofpinealcavernoma AT sircadonatella arelationshipbetweenbruxismandorofacialdystoniaatrigeminalelectrophysiologicalapproachinacasereportofpinealcavernoma AT staderinienricomaria arelationshipbetweenbruxismandorofacialdystoniaatrigeminalelectrophysiologicalapproachinacasereportofpinealcavernoma AT chessagiacomo arelationshipbetweenbruxismandorofacialdystoniaatrigeminalelectrophysiologicalapproachinacasereportofpinealcavernoma AT frisardigianni relationshipbetweenbruxismandorofacialdystoniaatrigeminalelectrophysiologicalapproachinacasereportofpinealcavernoma AT ianicesare relationshipbetweenbruxismandorofacialdystoniaatrigeminalelectrophysiologicalapproachinacasereportofpinealcavernoma AT saugianfranco relationshipbetweenbruxismandorofacialdystoniaatrigeminalelectrophysiologicalapproachinacasereportofpinealcavernoma AT frisardiflavio relationshipbetweenbruxismandorofacialdystoniaatrigeminalelectrophysiologicalapproachinacasereportofpinealcavernoma AT leornadiscarlo relationshipbetweenbruxismandorofacialdystoniaatrigeminalelectrophysiologicalapproachinacasereportofpinealcavernoma AT lumbauaurea relationshipbetweenbruxismandorofacialdystoniaatrigeminalelectrophysiologicalapproachinacasereportofpinealcavernoma AT enricopaolo relationshipbetweenbruxismandorofacialdystoniaatrigeminalelectrophysiologicalapproachinacasereportofpinealcavernoma AT sircadonatella relationshipbetweenbruxismandorofacialdystoniaatrigeminalelectrophysiologicalapproachinacasereportofpinealcavernoma AT staderinienricomaria relationshipbetweenbruxismandorofacialdystoniaatrigeminalelectrophysiologicalapproachinacasereportofpinealcavernoma AT chessagiacomo relationshipbetweenbruxismandorofacialdystoniaatrigeminalelectrophysiologicalapproachinacasereportofpinealcavernoma |