Cargando…
Inferring protein–protein interaction complexes from immunoprecipitation data
BACKGROUND: Protein–protein interactions in cells are widely explored using small–scale experiments. However, the search for protein complexes and their interactions in data from high throughput experiments such as immunoprecipitation is still a challenge. We present "4N", a novel method f...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3874675/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24237943 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-6-468 |
_version_ | 1782297261934379008 |
---|---|
author | Kutzera, Joachim Hoefsloot, Huub CJ Malovannaya, Anna Smit, August B Mechelen, Iven Van Smilde, Age K |
author_facet | Kutzera, Joachim Hoefsloot, Huub CJ Malovannaya, Anna Smit, August B Mechelen, Iven Van Smilde, Age K |
author_sort | Kutzera, Joachim |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Protein–protein interactions in cells are widely explored using small–scale experiments. However, the search for protein complexes and their interactions in data from high throughput experiments such as immunoprecipitation is still a challenge. We present "4N", a novel method for detecting protein complexes in such data. Our method is a heuristic algorithm based on Near Neighbor Network (3N) clustering. It is written in R, it is faster than model-based methods, and has only a small number of tuning parameters. We explain the application of our new method to real immunoprecipitation results and two artificial datasets. We show that the method can infer protein complexes from protein immunoprecipitation datasets of different densities and sizes. FINDINGS: 4N was applied on the immunoprecipitation dataset that was presented by the authors of the original 3N in Cell 145:787–799, 2011. The test with our method shows that it can reproduce the original clustering results with fewer manually adapted parameters and, in addition, gives direct insight into the complex–complex interactions. We also tested 4N on the human "Tip49a/b" dataset. We conclude that 4N can handle the contaminants and can correctly infer complexes from this very dense dataset. Further tests were performed on two artificial datasets of different sizes. We proved that the method predicts the reference complexes in the two artificial datasets with high accuracy, even when the number of samples is reduced. CONCLUSIONS: 4N has been implemented in R. We provide the sourcecode of 4N and a user-friendly toolbox including two example calculations. Biologists can use this 4N-toolbox even if they have a limited knowledge of R. There are only a few tuning parameters to set, and each of these parameters has a biological interpretation. The run times for medium scale datasets are in the order of minutes on a standard desktop PC. Large datasets can typically be analyzed within a few hours. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3874675 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38746752013-12-31 Inferring protein–protein interaction complexes from immunoprecipitation data Kutzera, Joachim Hoefsloot, Huub CJ Malovannaya, Anna Smit, August B Mechelen, Iven Van Smilde, Age K BMC Res Notes Technical Note BACKGROUND: Protein–protein interactions in cells are widely explored using small–scale experiments. However, the search for protein complexes and their interactions in data from high throughput experiments such as immunoprecipitation is still a challenge. We present "4N", a novel method for detecting protein complexes in such data. Our method is a heuristic algorithm based on Near Neighbor Network (3N) clustering. It is written in R, it is faster than model-based methods, and has only a small number of tuning parameters. We explain the application of our new method to real immunoprecipitation results and two artificial datasets. We show that the method can infer protein complexes from protein immunoprecipitation datasets of different densities and sizes. FINDINGS: 4N was applied on the immunoprecipitation dataset that was presented by the authors of the original 3N in Cell 145:787–799, 2011. The test with our method shows that it can reproduce the original clustering results with fewer manually adapted parameters and, in addition, gives direct insight into the complex–complex interactions. We also tested 4N on the human "Tip49a/b" dataset. We conclude that 4N can handle the contaminants and can correctly infer complexes from this very dense dataset. Further tests were performed on two artificial datasets of different sizes. We proved that the method predicts the reference complexes in the two artificial datasets with high accuracy, even when the number of samples is reduced. CONCLUSIONS: 4N has been implemented in R. We provide the sourcecode of 4N and a user-friendly toolbox including two example calculations. Biologists can use this 4N-toolbox even if they have a limited knowledge of R. There are only a few tuning parameters to set, and each of these parameters has a biological interpretation. The run times for medium scale datasets are in the order of minutes on a standard desktop PC. Large datasets can typically be analyzed within a few hours. BioMed Central 2013-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3874675/ /pubmed/24237943 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-6-468 Text en Copyright © 2013 Kutzera et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Technical Note Kutzera, Joachim Hoefsloot, Huub CJ Malovannaya, Anna Smit, August B Mechelen, Iven Van Smilde, Age K Inferring protein–protein interaction complexes from immunoprecipitation data |
title | Inferring protein–protein interaction complexes from immunoprecipitation data |
title_full | Inferring protein–protein interaction complexes from immunoprecipitation data |
title_fullStr | Inferring protein–protein interaction complexes from immunoprecipitation data |
title_full_unstemmed | Inferring protein–protein interaction complexes from immunoprecipitation data |
title_short | Inferring protein–protein interaction complexes from immunoprecipitation data |
title_sort | inferring protein–protein interaction complexes from immunoprecipitation data |
topic | Technical Note |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3874675/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24237943 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-6-468 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kutzerajoachim inferringproteinproteininteractioncomplexesfromimmunoprecipitationdata AT hoefsloothuubcj inferringproteinproteininteractioncomplexesfromimmunoprecipitationdata AT malovannayaanna inferringproteinproteininteractioncomplexesfromimmunoprecipitationdata AT smitaugustb inferringproteinproteininteractioncomplexesfromimmunoprecipitationdata AT mechelenivenvan inferringproteinproteininteractioncomplexesfromimmunoprecipitationdata AT smildeagek inferringproteinproteininteractioncomplexesfromimmunoprecipitationdata |