Cargando…

Biomechanical adaptations of mice cortical bone submitted to three different exercise modalities

OBJECTIVE: To compare the adaptive effects of three non-weight bearing exercise on bone mechanical properties. METHODS: 24 male Balb/c mice (22-25g), were randomly divided into four groups (n=6): sedentary group (S); swimming group (N) which performed sessions five times per week for 60 min progress...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Frajacomo, Fernando Tadeu Trevisan, Falcai, Maurício José, Fernandes, Cleverson Rodrigues, Shimano, Antonio Carlos, Garcia, Sérgio Britto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia Regional de São Paulo 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3874991/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24453691
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-78522013000600006
_version_ 1782297303936139264
author Frajacomo, Fernando Tadeu Trevisan
Falcai, Maurício José
Fernandes, Cleverson Rodrigues
Shimano, Antonio Carlos
Garcia, Sérgio Britto
author_facet Frajacomo, Fernando Tadeu Trevisan
Falcai, Maurício José
Fernandes, Cleverson Rodrigues
Shimano, Antonio Carlos
Garcia, Sérgio Britto
author_sort Frajacomo, Fernando Tadeu Trevisan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the adaptive effects of three non-weight bearing exercise on bone mechanical properties. METHODS: 24 male Balb/c mice (22-25g), were randomly divided into four groups (n=6): sedentary group (S); swimming group (N) which performed sessions five times per week for 60 min progressively; resistance group (R), which performed climbing exercise with progressive load, three times per week; and combined group (C), which performed the same protocols aforementioned being three times a week according to N protocol and two times a week the R protocol during eight weeks. Biomechanical tests, load until failure and stiffness evaluation of shinbone was performed after animals have been sacrificed. RESULTS: Stiffness values were statistically higher only in the isolated modalities groups (N and R, 41.68 ± 10.43 and 41.21 ± 11.38 N/mm, respectively) compared with the S group (28.48 ± 7.34 N/mm). However, taking into consideration the final body mass, relative values, there was no difference in the biomechanical tests among the groups. CONCLUSION: Data from the present investigation demonstrated a favorable influence of muscle contraction in lower impact isolated exercise modalities on absolute stiffness values, i.e.groups N and R, whereas the combined group (C) did not present any statistical significant difference compared to sedentary group. Level of Evidence II, Prospective Comparative Study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3874991
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia Regional de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38749912014-01-22 Biomechanical adaptations of mice cortical bone submitted to three different exercise modalities Frajacomo, Fernando Tadeu Trevisan Falcai, Maurício José Fernandes, Cleverson Rodrigues Shimano, Antonio Carlos Garcia, Sérgio Britto Acta Ortop Bras Original Article OBJECTIVE: To compare the adaptive effects of three non-weight bearing exercise on bone mechanical properties. METHODS: 24 male Balb/c mice (22-25g), were randomly divided into four groups (n=6): sedentary group (S); swimming group (N) which performed sessions five times per week for 60 min progressively; resistance group (R), which performed climbing exercise with progressive load, three times per week; and combined group (C), which performed the same protocols aforementioned being three times a week according to N protocol and two times a week the R protocol during eight weeks. Biomechanical tests, load until failure and stiffness evaluation of shinbone was performed after animals have been sacrificed. RESULTS: Stiffness values were statistically higher only in the isolated modalities groups (N and R, 41.68 ± 10.43 and 41.21 ± 11.38 N/mm, respectively) compared with the S group (28.48 ± 7.34 N/mm). However, taking into consideration the final body mass, relative values, there was no difference in the biomechanical tests among the groups. CONCLUSION: Data from the present investigation demonstrated a favorable influence of muscle contraction in lower impact isolated exercise modalities on absolute stiffness values, i.e.groups N and R, whereas the combined group (C) did not present any statistical significant difference compared to sedentary group. Level of Evidence II, Prospective Comparative Study. Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia Regional de São Paulo 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3874991/ /pubmed/24453691 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-78522013000600006 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Frajacomo, Fernando Tadeu Trevisan
Falcai, Maurício José
Fernandes, Cleverson Rodrigues
Shimano, Antonio Carlos
Garcia, Sérgio Britto
Biomechanical adaptations of mice cortical bone submitted to three different exercise modalities
title Biomechanical adaptations of mice cortical bone submitted to three different exercise modalities
title_full Biomechanical adaptations of mice cortical bone submitted to three different exercise modalities
title_fullStr Biomechanical adaptations of mice cortical bone submitted to three different exercise modalities
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical adaptations of mice cortical bone submitted to three different exercise modalities
title_short Biomechanical adaptations of mice cortical bone submitted to three different exercise modalities
title_sort biomechanical adaptations of mice cortical bone submitted to three different exercise modalities
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3874991/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24453691
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-78522013000600006
work_keys_str_mv AT frajacomofernandotadeutrevisan biomechanicaladaptationsofmicecorticalbonesubmittedtothreedifferentexercisemodalities
AT falcaimauriciojose biomechanicaladaptationsofmicecorticalbonesubmittedtothreedifferentexercisemodalities
AT fernandescleversonrodrigues biomechanicaladaptationsofmicecorticalbonesubmittedtothreedifferentexercisemodalities
AT shimanoantoniocarlos biomechanicaladaptationsofmicecorticalbonesubmittedtothreedifferentexercisemodalities
AT garciasergiobritto biomechanicaladaptationsofmicecorticalbonesubmittedtothreedifferentexercisemodalities