Cargando…
Psychosocial Impact of Alternative Management Policies for Low-Grade Cervical Abnormalities: Results from the TOMBOLA Randomised Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND: Large numbers of women who participate in cervical screening require follow-up for minor cytological abnormalities. Little is known about the psychological consequences of alternative management policies for these women. We compared, over 30-months, psychosocial outcomes of two policies:...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3875419/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24386076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080092 |
_version_ | 1782297346460090368 |
---|---|
author | Sharp, Linda Cotton, Seonaidh Little, Julian Gray, Nicola M. Cruickshank, Margaret Smart, Louise Thornton, Alison Waugh, Norman Walker, Leslie |
author_facet | Sharp, Linda Cotton, Seonaidh Little, Julian Gray, Nicola M. Cruickshank, Margaret Smart, Louise Thornton, Alison Waugh, Norman Walker, Leslie |
author_sort | Sharp, Linda |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Large numbers of women who participate in cervical screening require follow-up for minor cytological abnormalities. Little is known about the psychological consequences of alternative management policies for these women. We compared, over 30-months, psychosocial outcomes of two policies: cytological surveillance (repeat cervical cytology tests in primary care) and a hospital-based colposcopy examination. METHODS: Women attending for a routine cytology test within the UK NHS Cervical Screening Programmes were eligible to participate. 3399 women, aged 20–59 years, with low-grade abnormal cytology, were randomised to cytological surveillance (six-monthly tests; n = 1703) or initial colposcopy with biopsies and/or subsequent treatment based on colposcopic and histological findings (n = 1696). At 12, 18, 24 and 30-months post-recruitment, women completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). A subgroup (n = 2354) completed the Impact of Event Scale (IES) six weeks after the colposcopy episode or first surveillance cytology test. Primary outcomes were percentages over the entire follow-up period of significant depression (≥8) and significant anxiety (≥11; “30-month percentages”). Secondary outcomes were point prevalences of significant depression, significant anxiety and procedure-related distress (≥9). Outcomes were compared between arms by calculating fully-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for initial colposcopy versus cytological surveillance. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in 30-month percentages of significant depression (OR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.80–1.21) or anxiety (OR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.81–1.16) between arms. At the six-week assessment, anxiety and distress, but not depression, were significantly less common in the initial colposcopy arm (anxiety: 7.9% vs 13.4%; OR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.38–0.81; distress: 30.6% vs 39.3%, OR = 0.67 95% CI 0.54–0.84). Neither anxiety nor depression differed between arms at subsequent time-points. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in the longer-term psychosocial impact of management policies based on cytological surveillance or initial colposcopy. Policy-makers, clinicians, and women themselves can be reassured that neither management policy has a significantly greater psychosocial cost. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Controlled-Trials.com ISRCTN 34841617 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3875419 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38754192014-01-02 Psychosocial Impact of Alternative Management Policies for Low-Grade Cervical Abnormalities: Results from the TOMBOLA Randomised Controlled Trial Sharp, Linda Cotton, Seonaidh Little, Julian Gray, Nicola M. Cruickshank, Margaret Smart, Louise Thornton, Alison Waugh, Norman Walker, Leslie PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Large numbers of women who participate in cervical screening require follow-up for minor cytological abnormalities. Little is known about the psychological consequences of alternative management policies for these women. We compared, over 30-months, psychosocial outcomes of two policies: cytological surveillance (repeat cervical cytology tests in primary care) and a hospital-based colposcopy examination. METHODS: Women attending for a routine cytology test within the UK NHS Cervical Screening Programmes were eligible to participate. 3399 women, aged 20–59 years, with low-grade abnormal cytology, were randomised to cytological surveillance (six-monthly tests; n = 1703) or initial colposcopy with biopsies and/or subsequent treatment based on colposcopic and histological findings (n = 1696). At 12, 18, 24 and 30-months post-recruitment, women completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). A subgroup (n = 2354) completed the Impact of Event Scale (IES) six weeks after the colposcopy episode or first surveillance cytology test. Primary outcomes were percentages over the entire follow-up period of significant depression (≥8) and significant anxiety (≥11; “30-month percentages”). Secondary outcomes were point prevalences of significant depression, significant anxiety and procedure-related distress (≥9). Outcomes were compared between arms by calculating fully-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for initial colposcopy versus cytological surveillance. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in 30-month percentages of significant depression (OR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.80–1.21) or anxiety (OR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.81–1.16) between arms. At the six-week assessment, anxiety and distress, but not depression, were significantly less common in the initial colposcopy arm (anxiety: 7.9% vs 13.4%; OR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.38–0.81; distress: 30.6% vs 39.3%, OR = 0.67 95% CI 0.54–0.84). Neither anxiety nor depression differed between arms at subsequent time-points. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in the longer-term psychosocial impact of management policies based on cytological surveillance or initial colposcopy. Policy-makers, clinicians, and women themselves can be reassured that neither management policy has a significantly greater psychosocial cost. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Controlled-Trials.com ISRCTN 34841617 Public Library of Science 2013-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3875419/ /pubmed/24386076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080092 Text en © 2013 Sharp et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Sharp, Linda Cotton, Seonaidh Little, Julian Gray, Nicola M. Cruickshank, Margaret Smart, Louise Thornton, Alison Waugh, Norman Walker, Leslie Psychosocial Impact of Alternative Management Policies for Low-Grade Cervical Abnormalities: Results from the TOMBOLA Randomised Controlled Trial |
title | Psychosocial Impact of Alternative Management Policies for Low-Grade Cervical Abnormalities: Results from the TOMBOLA Randomised Controlled Trial |
title_full | Psychosocial Impact of Alternative Management Policies for Low-Grade Cervical Abnormalities: Results from the TOMBOLA Randomised Controlled Trial |
title_fullStr | Psychosocial Impact of Alternative Management Policies for Low-Grade Cervical Abnormalities: Results from the TOMBOLA Randomised Controlled Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Psychosocial Impact of Alternative Management Policies for Low-Grade Cervical Abnormalities: Results from the TOMBOLA Randomised Controlled Trial |
title_short | Psychosocial Impact of Alternative Management Policies for Low-Grade Cervical Abnormalities: Results from the TOMBOLA Randomised Controlled Trial |
title_sort | psychosocial impact of alternative management policies for low-grade cervical abnormalities: results from the tombola randomised controlled trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3875419/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24386076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080092 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sharplinda psychosocialimpactofalternativemanagementpoliciesforlowgradecervicalabnormalitiesresultsfromthetombolarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT cottonseonaidh psychosocialimpactofalternativemanagementpoliciesforlowgradecervicalabnormalitiesresultsfromthetombolarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT littlejulian psychosocialimpactofalternativemanagementpoliciesforlowgradecervicalabnormalitiesresultsfromthetombolarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT graynicolam psychosocialimpactofalternativemanagementpoliciesforlowgradecervicalabnormalitiesresultsfromthetombolarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT cruickshankmargaret psychosocialimpactofalternativemanagementpoliciesforlowgradecervicalabnormalitiesresultsfromthetombolarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT smartlouise psychosocialimpactofalternativemanagementpoliciesforlowgradecervicalabnormalitiesresultsfromthetombolarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT thorntonalison psychosocialimpactofalternativemanagementpoliciesforlowgradecervicalabnormalitiesresultsfromthetombolarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT waughnorman psychosocialimpactofalternativemanagementpoliciesforlowgradecervicalabnormalitiesresultsfromthetombolarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT walkerleslie psychosocialimpactofalternativemanagementpoliciesforlowgradecervicalabnormalitiesresultsfromthetombolarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT psychosocialimpactofalternativemanagementpoliciesforlowgradecervicalabnormalitiesresultsfromthetombolarandomisedcontrolledtrial |