Cargando…

Psychosocial Impact of Alternative Management Policies for Low-Grade Cervical Abnormalities: Results from the TOMBOLA Randomised Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: Large numbers of women who participate in cervical screening require follow-up for minor cytological abnormalities. Little is known about the psychological consequences of alternative management policies for these women. We compared, over 30-months, psychosocial outcomes of two policies:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sharp, Linda, Cotton, Seonaidh, Little, Julian, Gray, Nicola M., Cruickshank, Margaret, Smart, Louise, Thornton, Alison, Waugh, Norman, Walker, Leslie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3875419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24386076
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080092
_version_ 1782297346460090368
author Sharp, Linda
Cotton, Seonaidh
Little, Julian
Gray, Nicola M.
Cruickshank, Margaret
Smart, Louise
Thornton, Alison
Waugh, Norman
Walker, Leslie
author_facet Sharp, Linda
Cotton, Seonaidh
Little, Julian
Gray, Nicola M.
Cruickshank, Margaret
Smart, Louise
Thornton, Alison
Waugh, Norman
Walker, Leslie
author_sort Sharp, Linda
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Large numbers of women who participate in cervical screening require follow-up for minor cytological abnormalities. Little is known about the psychological consequences of alternative management policies for these women. We compared, over 30-months, psychosocial outcomes of two policies: cytological surveillance (repeat cervical cytology tests in primary care) and a hospital-based colposcopy examination. METHODS: Women attending for a routine cytology test within the UK NHS Cervical Screening Programmes were eligible to participate. 3399 women, aged 20–59 years, with low-grade abnormal cytology, were randomised to cytological surveillance (six-monthly tests; n = 1703) or initial colposcopy with biopsies and/or subsequent treatment based on colposcopic and histological findings (n = 1696). At 12, 18, 24 and 30-months post-recruitment, women completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). A subgroup (n = 2354) completed the Impact of Event Scale (IES) six weeks after the colposcopy episode or first surveillance cytology test. Primary outcomes were percentages over the entire follow-up period of significant depression (≥8) and significant anxiety (≥11; “30-month percentages”). Secondary outcomes were point prevalences of significant depression, significant anxiety and procedure-related distress (≥9). Outcomes were compared between arms by calculating fully-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for initial colposcopy versus cytological surveillance. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in 30-month percentages of significant depression (OR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.80–1.21) or anxiety (OR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.81–1.16) between arms. At the six-week assessment, anxiety and distress, but not depression, were significantly less common in the initial colposcopy arm (anxiety: 7.9% vs 13.4%; OR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.38–0.81; distress: 30.6% vs 39.3%, OR = 0.67 95% CI 0.54–0.84). Neither anxiety nor depression differed between arms at subsequent time-points. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in the longer-term psychosocial impact of management policies based on cytological surveillance or initial colposcopy. Policy-makers, clinicians, and women themselves can be reassured that neither management policy has a significantly greater psychosocial cost. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Controlled-Trials.com ISRCTN 34841617
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3875419
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38754192014-01-02 Psychosocial Impact of Alternative Management Policies for Low-Grade Cervical Abnormalities: Results from the TOMBOLA Randomised Controlled Trial Sharp, Linda Cotton, Seonaidh Little, Julian Gray, Nicola M. Cruickshank, Margaret Smart, Louise Thornton, Alison Waugh, Norman Walker, Leslie PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Large numbers of women who participate in cervical screening require follow-up for minor cytological abnormalities. Little is known about the psychological consequences of alternative management policies for these women. We compared, over 30-months, psychosocial outcomes of two policies: cytological surveillance (repeat cervical cytology tests in primary care) and a hospital-based colposcopy examination. METHODS: Women attending for a routine cytology test within the UK NHS Cervical Screening Programmes were eligible to participate. 3399 women, aged 20–59 years, with low-grade abnormal cytology, were randomised to cytological surveillance (six-monthly tests; n = 1703) or initial colposcopy with biopsies and/or subsequent treatment based on colposcopic and histological findings (n = 1696). At 12, 18, 24 and 30-months post-recruitment, women completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). A subgroup (n = 2354) completed the Impact of Event Scale (IES) six weeks after the colposcopy episode or first surveillance cytology test. Primary outcomes were percentages over the entire follow-up period of significant depression (≥8) and significant anxiety (≥11; “30-month percentages”). Secondary outcomes were point prevalences of significant depression, significant anxiety and procedure-related distress (≥9). Outcomes were compared between arms by calculating fully-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for initial colposcopy versus cytological surveillance. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in 30-month percentages of significant depression (OR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.80–1.21) or anxiety (OR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.81–1.16) between arms. At the six-week assessment, anxiety and distress, but not depression, were significantly less common in the initial colposcopy arm (anxiety: 7.9% vs 13.4%; OR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.38–0.81; distress: 30.6% vs 39.3%, OR = 0.67 95% CI 0.54–0.84). Neither anxiety nor depression differed between arms at subsequent time-points. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in the longer-term psychosocial impact of management policies based on cytological surveillance or initial colposcopy. Policy-makers, clinicians, and women themselves can be reassured that neither management policy has a significantly greater psychosocial cost. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Controlled-Trials.com ISRCTN 34841617 Public Library of Science 2013-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3875419/ /pubmed/24386076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080092 Text en © 2013 Sharp et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sharp, Linda
Cotton, Seonaidh
Little, Julian
Gray, Nicola M.
Cruickshank, Margaret
Smart, Louise
Thornton, Alison
Waugh, Norman
Walker, Leslie
Psychosocial Impact of Alternative Management Policies for Low-Grade Cervical Abnormalities: Results from the TOMBOLA Randomised Controlled Trial
title Psychosocial Impact of Alternative Management Policies for Low-Grade Cervical Abnormalities: Results from the TOMBOLA Randomised Controlled Trial
title_full Psychosocial Impact of Alternative Management Policies for Low-Grade Cervical Abnormalities: Results from the TOMBOLA Randomised Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Psychosocial Impact of Alternative Management Policies for Low-Grade Cervical Abnormalities: Results from the TOMBOLA Randomised Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Psychosocial Impact of Alternative Management Policies for Low-Grade Cervical Abnormalities: Results from the TOMBOLA Randomised Controlled Trial
title_short Psychosocial Impact of Alternative Management Policies for Low-Grade Cervical Abnormalities: Results from the TOMBOLA Randomised Controlled Trial
title_sort psychosocial impact of alternative management policies for low-grade cervical abnormalities: results from the tombola randomised controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3875419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24386076
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080092
work_keys_str_mv AT sharplinda psychosocialimpactofalternativemanagementpoliciesforlowgradecervicalabnormalitiesresultsfromthetombolarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT cottonseonaidh psychosocialimpactofalternativemanagementpoliciesforlowgradecervicalabnormalitiesresultsfromthetombolarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT littlejulian psychosocialimpactofalternativemanagementpoliciesforlowgradecervicalabnormalitiesresultsfromthetombolarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT graynicolam psychosocialimpactofalternativemanagementpoliciesforlowgradecervicalabnormalitiesresultsfromthetombolarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT cruickshankmargaret psychosocialimpactofalternativemanagementpoliciesforlowgradecervicalabnormalitiesresultsfromthetombolarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT smartlouise psychosocialimpactofalternativemanagementpoliciesforlowgradecervicalabnormalitiesresultsfromthetombolarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT thorntonalison psychosocialimpactofalternativemanagementpoliciesforlowgradecervicalabnormalitiesresultsfromthetombolarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT waughnorman psychosocialimpactofalternativemanagementpoliciesforlowgradecervicalabnormalitiesresultsfromthetombolarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT walkerleslie psychosocialimpactofalternativemanagementpoliciesforlowgradecervicalabnormalitiesresultsfromthetombolarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT psychosocialimpactofalternativemanagementpoliciesforlowgradecervicalabnormalitiesresultsfromthetombolarandomisedcontrolledtrial