Cargando…
Sensitivity to Auditory Spectral Width in the Fetus and Infant – An fMEG Study
Auditory change detection is crucial for the development of the auditory system and a prerequisite for language development. In neonates, stimuli with broad spectral width like white noise (WN) elicit the highest response compared to pure tone and combined tone stimuli. In the current study we addre...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3876038/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24427130 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00917 |
_version_ | 1782297454975123456 |
---|---|
author | Muenssinger, Jana Matuz, Tamara Schleger, Franziska Draganova, Rossitza Weiss, Magdalene Kiefer-Schmidt, Isabelle Wacker-Gussmann, Annette Govindan, Rathinaswamy B. Lowery, Curtis L. Eswaran, Hari Preissl, Hubert |
author_facet | Muenssinger, Jana Matuz, Tamara Schleger, Franziska Draganova, Rossitza Weiss, Magdalene Kiefer-Schmidt, Isabelle Wacker-Gussmann, Annette Govindan, Rathinaswamy B. Lowery, Curtis L. Eswaran, Hari Preissl, Hubert |
author_sort | Muenssinger, Jana |
collection | PubMed |
description | Auditory change detection is crucial for the development of the auditory system and a prerequisite for language development. In neonates, stimuli with broad spectral width like white noise (WN) elicit the highest response compared to pure tone and combined tone stimuli. In the current study we addressed for the first time the question how fetuses react to “WN” stimulation. Twenty-five fetuses (M(age) = 34.59 weeks GA, SD ± 2.35) and 28 healthy neonates and infants (M(age) = 37.18 days, SD ± 15.52) were tested with the first paradigm, wherein 500 Hz tones, 750 Hz tones, and WN segments were randomly presented and auditory evoked responses (AERs) were measured using fetal magnetoencephalography (fMEG). In the second paradigm, 12 fetuses (M(age) = 25.7 weeks GA, SD ± 2.4) and 6 healthy neonates (M(age) = 23 days and SD ± 6.2) were presented with two auditory oddball conditions: condition 1 consisted of attenuated WN as standard and 500 Hz tones and WN as deviants. In condition 2, standard 500 Hz tones were intermixed with WN and attenuated WN. AERs to volume change and change in spectral width were evaluated. In both paradigms, significantly higher AER amplitudes to WN than to pure tones replicated prior findings in neonates and infants. In fetuses, no significant differences were found between the auditory evoked response amplitudes of WN segments and pure tones (both paradigms). A trend toward significance was reached when comparing the auditory evoked response amplitudes elicited by attenuated WN with those elicited by WN (loudness change, second paradigm). As expected, we observed high sensibility to spectral width in newborns and infants. However, in the group of fetuses, no sensibility to spectral width was observed. This negative finding may be caused by different attenuation levels of the maternal tissue for different frequency components. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3876038 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38760382014-01-14 Sensitivity to Auditory Spectral Width in the Fetus and Infant – An fMEG Study Muenssinger, Jana Matuz, Tamara Schleger, Franziska Draganova, Rossitza Weiss, Magdalene Kiefer-Schmidt, Isabelle Wacker-Gussmann, Annette Govindan, Rathinaswamy B. Lowery, Curtis L. Eswaran, Hari Preissl, Hubert Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Auditory change detection is crucial for the development of the auditory system and a prerequisite for language development. In neonates, stimuli with broad spectral width like white noise (WN) elicit the highest response compared to pure tone and combined tone stimuli. In the current study we addressed for the first time the question how fetuses react to “WN” stimulation. Twenty-five fetuses (M(age) = 34.59 weeks GA, SD ± 2.35) and 28 healthy neonates and infants (M(age) = 37.18 days, SD ± 15.52) were tested with the first paradigm, wherein 500 Hz tones, 750 Hz tones, and WN segments were randomly presented and auditory evoked responses (AERs) were measured using fetal magnetoencephalography (fMEG). In the second paradigm, 12 fetuses (M(age) = 25.7 weeks GA, SD ± 2.4) and 6 healthy neonates (M(age) = 23 days and SD ± 6.2) were presented with two auditory oddball conditions: condition 1 consisted of attenuated WN as standard and 500 Hz tones and WN as deviants. In condition 2, standard 500 Hz tones were intermixed with WN and attenuated WN. AERs to volume change and change in spectral width were evaluated. In both paradigms, significantly higher AER amplitudes to WN than to pure tones replicated prior findings in neonates and infants. In fetuses, no significant differences were found between the auditory evoked response amplitudes of WN segments and pure tones (both paradigms). A trend toward significance was reached when comparing the auditory evoked response amplitudes elicited by attenuated WN with those elicited by WN (loudness change, second paradigm). As expected, we observed high sensibility to spectral width in newborns and infants. However, in the group of fetuses, no sensibility to spectral width was observed. This negative finding may be caused by different attenuation levels of the maternal tissue for different frequency components. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3876038/ /pubmed/24427130 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00917 Text en Copyright © 2013 Muenssinger, Matuz, Schleger, Draganova, Weiss, Kiefer-Schmidt, Wacker-Gussmann, Govindan, Lowery, Eswaran and Preissl. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Muenssinger, Jana Matuz, Tamara Schleger, Franziska Draganova, Rossitza Weiss, Magdalene Kiefer-Schmidt, Isabelle Wacker-Gussmann, Annette Govindan, Rathinaswamy B. Lowery, Curtis L. Eswaran, Hari Preissl, Hubert Sensitivity to Auditory Spectral Width in the Fetus and Infant – An fMEG Study |
title | Sensitivity to Auditory Spectral Width in the Fetus and Infant – An fMEG Study |
title_full | Sensitivity to Auditory Spectral Width in the Fetus and Infant – An fMEG Study |
title_fullStr | Sensitivity to Auditory Spectral Width in the Fetus and Infant – An fMEG Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Sensitivity to Auditory Spectral Width in the Fetus and Infant – An fMEG Study |
title_short | Sensitivity to Auditory Spectral Width in the Fetus and Infant – An fMEG Study |
title_sort | sensitivity to auditory spectral width in the fetus and infant – an fmeg study |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3876038/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24427130 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00917 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT muenssingerjana sensitivitytoauditoryspectralwidthinthefetusandinfantanfmegstudy AT matuztamara sensitivitytoauditoryspectralwidthinthefetusandinfantanfmegstudy AT schlegerfranziska sensitivitytoauditoryspectralwidthinthefetusandinfantanfmegstudy AT draganovarossitza sensitivitytoauditoryspectralwidthinthefetusandinfantanfmegstudy AT weissmagdalene sensitivitytoauditoryspectralwidthinthefetusandinfantanfmegstudy AT kieferschmidtisabelle sensitivitytoauditoryspectralwidthinthefetusandinfantanfmegstudy AT wackergussmannannette sensitivitytoauditoryspectralwidthinthefetusandinfantanfmegstudy AT govindanrathinaswamyb sensitivitytoauditoryspectralwidthinthefetusandinfantanfmegstudy AT lowerycurtisl sensitivitytoauditoryspectralwidthinthefetusandinfantanfmegstudy AT eswaranhari sensitivitytoauditoryspectralwidthinthefetusandinfantanfmegstudy AT preisslhubert sensitivitytoauditoryspectralwidthinthefetusandinfantanfmegstudy |