Cargando…

Sensitivity to Auditory Spectral Width in the Fetus and Infant – An fMEG Study

Auditory change detection is crucial for the development of the auditory system and a prerequisite for language development. In neonates, stimuli with broad spectral width like white noise (WN) elicit the highest response compared to pure tone and combined tone stimuli. In the current study we addre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Muenssinger, Jana, Matuz, Tamara, Schleger, Franziska, Draganova, Rossitza, Weiss, Magdalene, Kiefer-Schmidt, Isabelle, Wacker-Gussmann, Annette, Govindan, Rathinaswamy B., Lowery, Curtis L., Eswaran, Hari, Preissl, Hubert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3876038/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24427130
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00917
_version_ 1782297454975123456
author Muenssinger, Jana
Matuz, Tamara
Schleger, Franziska
Draganova, Rossitza
Weiss, Magdalene
Kiefer-Schmidt, Isabelle
Wacker-Gussmann, Annette
Govindan, Rathinaswamy B.
Lowery, Curtis L.
Eswaran, Hari
Preissl, Hubert
author_facet Muenssinger, Jana
Matuz, Tamara
Schleger, Franziska
Draganova, Rossitza
Weiss, Magdalene
Kiefer-Schmidt, Isabelle
Wacker-Gussmann, Annette
Govindan, Rathinaswamy B.
Lowery, Curtis L.
Eswaran, Hari
Preissl, Hubert
author_sort Muenssinger, Jana
collection PubMed
description Auditory change detection is crucial for the development of the auditory system and a prerequisite for language development. In neonates, stimuli with broad spectral width like white noise (WN) elicit the highest response compared to pure tone and combined tone stimuli. In the current study we addressed for the first time the question how fetuses react to “WN” stimulation. Twenty-five fetuses (M(age) = 34.59 weeks GA, SD ± 2.35) and 28 healthy neonates and infants (M(age) = 37.18 days, SD ± 15.52) were tested with the first paradigm, wherein 500 Hz tones, 750 Hz tones, and WN segments were randomly presented and auditory evoked responses (AERs) were measured using fetal magnetoencephalography (fMEG). In the second paradigm, 12 fetuses (M(age) = 25.7 weeks GA, SD ± 2.4) and 6 healthy neonates (M(age) = 23 days and SD ± 6.2) were presented with two auditory oddball conditions: condition 1 consisted of attenuated WN as standard and 500 Hz tones and WN as deviants. In condition 2, standard 500 Hz tones were intermixed with WN and attenuated WN. AERs to volume change and change in spectral width were evaluated. In both paradigms, significantly higher AER amplitudes to WN than to pure tones replicated prior findings in neonates and infants. In fetuses, no significant differences were found between the auditory evoked response amplitudes of WN segments and pure tones (both paradigms). A trend toward significance was reached when comparing the auditory evoked response amplitudes elicited by attenuated WN with those elicited by WN (loudness change, second paradigm). As expected, we observed high sensibility to spectral width in newborns and infants. However, in the group of fetuses, no sensibility to spectral width was observed. This negative finding may be caused by different attenuation levels of the maternal tissue for different frequency components.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3876038
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38760382014-01-14 Sensitivity to Auditory Spectral Width in the Fetus and Infant – An fMEG Study Muenssinger, Jana Matuz, Tamara Schleger, Franziska Draganova, Rossitza Weiss, Magdalene Kiefer-Schmidt, Isabelle Wacker-Gussmann, Annette Govindan, Rathinaswamy B. Lowery, Curtis L. Eswaran, Hari Preissl, Hubert Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Auditory change detection is crucial for the development of the auditory system and a prerequisite for language development. In neonates, stimuli with broad spectral width like white noise (WN) elicit the highest response compared to pure tone and combined tone stimuli. In the current study we addressed for the first time the question how fetuses react to “WN” stimulation. Twenty-five fetuses (M(age) = 34.59 weeks GA, SD ± 2.35) and 28 healthy neonates and infants (M(age) = 37.18 days, SD ± 15.52) were tested with the first paradigm, wherein 500 Hz tones, 750 Hz tones, and WN segments were randomly presented and auditory evoked responses (AERs) were measured using fetal magnetoencephalography (fMEG). In the second paradigm, 12 fetuses (M(age) = 25.7 weeks GA, SD ± 2.4) and 6 healthy neonates (M(age) = 23 days and SD ± 6.2) were presented with two auditory oddball conditions: condition 1 consisted of attenuated WN as standard and 500 Hz tones and WN as deviants. In condition 2, standard 500 Hz tones were intermixed with WN and attenuated WN. AERs to volume change and change in spectral width were evaluated. In both paradigms, significantly higher AER amplitudes to WN than to pure tones replicated prior findings in neonates and infants. In fetuses, no significant differences were found between the auditory evoked response amplitudes of WN segments and pure tones (both paradigms). A trend toward significance was reached when comparing the auditory evoked response amplitudes elicited by attenuated WN with those elicited by WN (loudness change, second paradigm). As expected, we observed high sensibility to spectral width in newborns and infants. However, in the group of fetuses, no sensibility to spectral width was observed. This negative finding may be caused by different attenuation levels of the maternal tissue for different frequency components. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3876038/ /pubmed/24427130 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00917 Text en Copyright © 2013 Muenssinger, Matuz, Schleger, Draganova, Weiss, Kiefer-Schmidt, Wacker-Gussmann, Govindan, Lowery, Eswaran and Preissl. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Muenssinger, Jana
Matuz, Tamara
Schleger, Franziska
Draganova, Rossitza
Weiss, Magdalene
Kiefer-Schmidt, Isabelle
Wacker-Gussmann, Annette
Govindan, Rathinaswamy B.
Lowery, Curtis L.
Eswaran, Hari
Preissl, Hubert
Sensitivity to Auditory Spectral Width in the Fetus and Infant – An fMEG Study
title Sensitivity to Auditory Spectral Width in the Fetus and Infant – An fMEG Study
title_full Sensitivity to Auditory Spectral Width in the Fetus and Infant – An fMEG Study
title_fullStr Sensitivity to Auditory Spectral Width in the Fetus and Infant – An fMEG Study
title_full_unstemmed Sensitivity to Auditory Spectral Width in the Fetus and Infant – An fMEG Study
title_short Sensitivity to Auditory Spectral Width in the Fetus and Infant – An fMEG Study
title_sort sensitivity to auditory spectral width in the fetus and infant – an fmeg study
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3876038/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24427130
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00917
work_keys_str_mv AT muenssingerjana sensitivitytoauditoryspectralwidthinthefetusandinfantanfmegstudy
AT matuztamara sensitivitytoauditoryspectralwidthinthefetusandinfantanfmegstudy
AT schlegerfranziska sensitivitytoauditoryspectralwidthinthefetusandinfantanfmegstudy
AT draganovarossitza sensitivitytoauditoryspectralwidthinthefetusandinfantanfmegstudy
AT weissmagdalene sensitivitytoauditoryspectralwidthinthefetusandinfantanfmegstudy
AT kieferschmidtisabelle sensitivitytoauditoryspectralwidthinthefetusandinfantanfmegstudy
AT wackergussmannannette sensitivitytoauditoryspectralwidthinthefetusandinfantanfmegstudy
AT govindanrathinaswamyb sensitivitytoauditoryspectralwidthinthefetusandinfantanfmegstudy
AT lowerycurtisl sensitivitytoauditoryspectralwidthinthefetusandinfantanfmegstudy
AT eswaranhari sensitivitytoauditoryspectralwidthinthefetusandinfantanfmegstudy
AT preisslhubert sensitivitytoauditoryspectralwidthinthefetusandinfantanfmegstudy