Cargando…

A Survey of Graduating Emergency Medicine Residents’ Experience with Cricothyrotomy

INTRODUCTION: The Emergency Medicine (EM) Residency Review Committee stipulates that residents perform 3 cricothyrotomies in training but does not distinguish between those done on patients or via other training methods. This study was designed to determine how many cricothyrotomies residents have p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Makowski, Andrew L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3876318/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24381695
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2013.7.18183
_version_ 1782297484849053696
author Makowski, Andrew L.
author_facet Makowski, Andrew L.
author_sort Makowski, Andrew L.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The Emergency Medicine (EM) Residency Review Committee stipulates that residents perform 3 cricothyrotomies in training but does not distinguish between those done on patients or via other training methods. This study was designed to determine how many cricothyrotomies residents have performed on living patients, the breadth and prevalence of alternative methods of instruction, and residents’ degree of comfort with performing the procedure unassisted. METHODS: We utilized a web-based tool to survey EM residents nearing graduation and gathered data regarding the number of cricothyrotomies performed on living and deceased patients, animals, and models/simulators. Residents indicating experience with the procedure were asked additional questions as to the indication, supervision, and outcome of their most recent cricothyrotomy. We also collected data regarding experience with rescue airway devices, observation of cricothyrotomy, and comfort (“0–10” scale with “10” representing complete confidence) regarding the procedure. RESULTS: Of 296 residents surveyed, 22.0% performed a cricothyrotomy on a living patient, and 51.6% had witnessed at least one performed. Those who completed a single cricothyrotomy reported a significantly greater level of confidence, 6.3 (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.7–7.0), than those who did none, 4.4 (95% CI 4.1–4.7), p<<0.001. Most respondents, 68.1%, had used the recently deceased to practice the technique, and those who had done so more than once reported higher confidence, 5.5 (95% 5.1–5.9), than those who had never done so, 4.1 (95% CI 3.7–4.5), p<<0.001. Residents who practiced cricothyrotomy on both simulators and the recently deceased expressed more confidence, 5.4 (95% CI 5.0–5.8), than those who used only simulators, 4.0 (95% CI 3.6–4.5), p<<0.001. Neither utilization of models, simulators, or animals, nor observance of others’ performance of the procedure independently affected reported confidence among residents. CONCLUSION: While prevalence of cricothyrotomy and reported comfort with the procedure remain low, performing the procedure on living or deceased patients increased residents’ confidence in undertaking an unassisted cricothyrotomy upon graduation in the population surveyed. There is evidence to show that multiple methods of instruction may yield the highest benefit, but further study is needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3876318
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38763182013-12-31 A Survey of Graduating Emergency Medicine Residents’ Experience with Cricothyrotomy Makowski, Andrew L. West J Emerg Med Provider Workforce INTRODUCTION: The Emergency Medicine (EM) Residency Review Committee stipulates that residents perform 3 cricothyrotomies in training but does not distinguish between those done on patients or via other training methods. This study was designed to determine how many cricothyrotomies residents have performed on living patients, the breadth and prevalence of alternative methods of instruction, and residents’ degree of comfort with performing the procedure unassisted. METHODS: We utilized a web-based tool to survey EM residents nearing graduation and gathered data regarding the number of cricothyrotomies performed on living and deceased patients, animals, and models/simulators. Residents indicating experience with the procedure were asked additional questions as to the indication, supervision, and outcome of their most recent cricothyrotomy. We also collected data regarding experience with rescue airway devices, observation of cricothyrotomy, and comfort (“0–10” scale with “10” representing complete confidence) regarding the procedure. RESULTS: Of 296 residents surveyed, 22.0% performed a cricothyrotomy on a living patient, and 51.6% had witnessed at least one performed. Those who completed a single cricothyrotomy reported a significantly greater level of confidence, 6.3 (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.7–7.0), than those who did none, 4.4 (95% CI 4.1–4.7), p<<0.001. Most respondents, 68.1%, had used the recently deceased to practice the technique, and those who had done so more than once reported higher confidence, 5.5 (95% 5.1–5.9), than those who had never done so, 4.1 (95% CI 3.7–4.5), p<<0.001. Residents who practiced cricothyrotomy on both simulators and the recently deceased expressed more confidence, 5.4 (95% CI 5.0–5.8), than those who used only simulators, 4.0 (95% CI 3.6–4.5), p<<0.001. Neither utilization of models, simulators, or animals, nor observance of others’ performance of the procedure independently affected reported confidence among residents. CONCLUSION: While prevalence of cricothyrotomy and reported comfort with the procedure remain low, performing the procedure on living or deceased patients increased residents’ confidence in undertaking an unassisted cricothyrotomy upon graduation in the population surveyed. There is evidence to show that multiple methods of instruction may yield the highest benefit, but further study is needed. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2013-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3876318/ /pubmed/24381695 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2013.7.18183 Text en Copyright © 2013 the authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Provider Workforce
Makowski, Andrew L.
A Survey of Graduating Emergency Medicine Residents’ Experience with Cricothyrotomy
title A Survey of Graduating Emergency Medicine Residents’ Experience with Cricothyrotomy
title_full A Survey of Graduating Emergency Medicine Residents’ Experience with Cricothyrotomy
title_fullStr A Survey of Graduating Emergency Medicine Residents’ Experience with Cricothyrotomy
title_full_unstemmed A Survey of Graduating Emergency Medicine Residents’ Experience with Cricothyrotomy
title_short A Survey of Graduating Emergency Medicine Residents’ Experience with Cricothyrotomy
title_sort survey of graduating emergency medicine residents’ experience with cricothyrotomy
topic Provider Workforce
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3876318/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24381695
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2013.7.18183
work_keys_str_mv AT makowskiandrewl asurveyofgraduatingemergencymedicineresidentsexperiencewithcricothyrotomy
AT makowskiandrewl surveyofgraduatingemergencymedicineresidentsexperiencewithcricothyrotomy