Cargando…
Systemic Heparinisation in Laparoscopic Live Donor Nephrectomy
Introduction. Systemic heparinisation is advocated during laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy (LDN) as a preventative measure against renal vascular thrombosis during the warm ischaemic interval. This study compares the outcome with and without the administration of systemic heparinisation. Methods....
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3876905/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24455192 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/138926 |
_version_ | 1782297554772295680 |
---|---|
author | Crotty, Charlotte Tabbakh, Yasmin Hosgood, Sarah A. Nicholson, Michael L. |
author_facet | Crotty, Charlotte Tabbakh, Yasmin Hosgood, Sarah A. Nicholson, Michael L. |
author_sort | Crotty, Charlotte |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction. Systemic heparinisation is advocated during laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy (LDN) as a preventative measure against renal vascular thrombosis during the warm ischaemic interval. This study compares the outcome with and without the administration of systemic heparinisation. Methods. A retrospective analysis was performed on 186 consecutive LDN patients between April 2008 and November 2012. Systemic heparin (2000–3000 IU) was administered intravenously to donors (hep n = 109). From January 2010, heparin was not used systemically in this group of LDN (no hep n = 77). Outcome measures included donor and recipient complications, initial graft function, and 12 month graft survival. Results. The demographics of both heparinised and non-heparinised donors were similar. The warm ischaemic time (WIT) was comparable in both groups (WIT; hep 5 ± 3 versus no hep 5 ± 3 minutes; P = 1.000). There was no difference in complication rates, no episodes of graft thrombosis, and no incidences of primary nonfunction in either group. Delayed graft function occurred in 4/109 and 1/77 (3.6% versus 1.2%; P = 0.405) and there was no significant difference in graft survival (P = 0.650). Conclusion. Omitting systemic heparinisation during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is a feasible and safe approach that does not compromise donor or recipient outcome. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3876905 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38769052014-01-16 Systemic Heparinisation in Laparoscopic Live Donor Nephrectomy Crotty, Charlotte Tabbakh, Yasmin Hosgood, Sarah A. Nicholson, Michael L. J Transplant Clinical Study Introduction. Systemic heparinisation is advocated during laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy (LDN) as a preventative measure against renal vascular thrombosis during the warm ischaemic interval. This study compares the outcome with and without the administration of systemic heparinisation. Methods. A retrospective analysis was performed on 186 consecutive LDN patients between April 2008 and November 2012. Systemic heparin (2000–3000 IU) was administered intravenously to donors (hep n = 109). From January 2010, heparin was not used systemically in this group of LDN (no hep n = 77). Outcome measures included donor and recipient complications, initial graft function, and 12 month graft survival. Results. The demographics of both heparinised and non-heparinised donors were similar. The warm ischaemic time (WIT) was comparable in both groups (WIT; hep 5 ± 3 versus no hep 5 ± 3 minutes; P = 1.000). There was no difference in complication rates, no episodes of graft thrombosis, and no incidences of primary nonfunction in either group. Delayed graft function occurred in 4/109 and 1/77 (3.6% versus 1.2%; P = 0.405) and there was no significant difference in graft survival (P = 0.650). Conclusion. Omitting systemic heparinisation during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is a feasible and safe approach that does not compromise donor or recipient outcome. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3876905/ /pubmed/24455192 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/138926 Text en Copyright © 2013 Charlotte Crotty et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Crotty, Charlotte Tabbakh, Yasmin Hosgood, Sarah A. Nicholson, Michael L. Systemic Heparinisation in Laparoscopic Live Donor Nephrectomy |
title | Systemic Heparinisation in Laparoscopic Live Donor Nephrectomy |
title_full | Systemic Heparinisation in Laparoscopic Live Donor Nephrectomy |
title_fullStr | Systemic Heparinisation in Laparoscopic Live Donor Nephrectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | Systemic Heparinisation in Laparoscopic Live Donor Nephrectomy |
title_short | Systemic Heparinisation in Laparoscopic Live Donor Nephrectomy |
title_sort | systemic heparinisation in laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3876905/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24455192 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/138926 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT crottycharlotte systemicheparinisationinlaparoscopiclivedonornephrectomy AT tabbakhyasmin systemicheparinisationinlaparoscopiclivedonornephrectomy AT hosgoodsaraha systemicheparinisationinlaparoscopiclivedonornephrectomy AT nicholsonmichaell systemicheparinisationinlaparoscopiclivedonornephrectomy |