Cargando…

Comparison of Methods for Correction of Mortality Estimates for Loss to Follow-Up after ART Initiation: A Case of the Infectious Diseases Institute, Uganda

BACKGROUND: In sub-Saharan Africa, a large proportion of HIV positive patients on antiretroviral therapy (ART) are lost to follow-up, some of whom are dead. The objective of this study was to validate methods used to correct mortality estimates for loss-to-follow-up using a cohort with complete deat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kiragga, Agnes N., Castelnuovo, Barbara, Musomba, Rachel, Levin, Jonathan, Kambugu, Andrew, Manabe, Yukari C., Yiannoutsos, Constantin T., Kiwanuka, Noah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3877043/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24391780
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083524
_version_ 1782297579208310784
author Kiragga, Agnes N.
Castelnuovo, Barbara
Musomba, Rachel
Levin, Jonathan
Kambugu, Andrew
Manabe, Yukari C.
Yiannoutsos, Constantin T.
Kiwanuka, Noah
author_facet Kiragga, Agnes N.
Castelnuovo, Barbara
Musomba, Rachel
Levin, Jonathan
Kambugu, Andrew
Manabe, Yukari C.
Yiannoutsos, Constantin T.
Kiwanuka, Noah
author_sort Kiragga, Agnes N.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In sub-Saharan Africa, a large proportion of HIV positive patients on antiretroviral therapy (ART) are lost to follow-up, some of whom are dead. The objective of this study was to validate methods used to correct mortality estimates for loss-to-follow-up using a cohort with complete death ascertainment. METHODS: Routinely collected data from HIV patients initiating first line antiretroviral therapy (ART) at the Infectious Diseases Institute (IDI) (Routine Cohort) was used. Three methods to estimate mortality after initiation were: 1) standard Kaplan-Meier estimation (uncorrected method) that uses passively observed data; 2) double-sampling methods by Frangakis and Rubin (F&R) where deaths obtained from patient tracing studies are given a higher weight than those passively ascertained; 3) Nomogram proposed by Egger et al. Corrected mortality estimates in the Routine Cohort, were compared with the estimates from the IDI research observational cohort (Research Cohort), which was used as the “gold-standard”. RESULTS: We included 5,633 patients from the Routine Cohort and 559 from the Research Cohort. Uncorrected mortality estimates (95% confidence interval [1]) in the Routine Cohort at 1, 2 and 3 years were 5.5% (4.9%–6.3%), 6.6% (5.9%–7.5%) and 7.4% (6.5%–8.5%), respectively. The F&R corrected estimates at 1, 2 and 3 years were 11.2% (5.8%–21.2%), 15.8% (9.9%–24.8%) and 18.5% (12.3% –27.2%) respectively. The estimates obtained from the Research Cohort were 15.6% (12.8%–18.9%), 17.5% (14.6%–21.0%) and 19.0% (15.3%–21.9%) at 1, 2 and 3 years respectively. Using the nomogram method in the Routine Cohort, the corrected programme-level mortality estimate in year 1 was 11.9% (8.0%–15.7%). CONCLUSION: Mortality adjustments provided by the F&R and nomogram methods are adequate and should be employed to correct mortality for loss-to-follow-up in large HIV care centres in Sub-Saharan Africa.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3877043
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38770432014-01-03 Comparison of Methods for Correction of Mortality Estimates for Loss to Follow-Up after ART Initiation: A Case of the Infectious Diseases Institute, Uganda Kiragga, Agnes N. Castelnuovo, Barbara Musomba, Rachel Levin, Jonathan Kambugu, Andrew Manabe, Yukari C. Yiannoutsos, Constantin T. Kiwanuka, Noah PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: In sub-Saharan Africa, a large proportion of HIV positive patients on antiretroviral therapy (ART) are lost to follow-up, some of whom are dead. The objective of this study was to validate methods used to correct mortality estimates for loss-to-follow-up using a cohort with complete death ascertainment. METHODS: Routinely collected data from HIV patients initiating first line antiretroviral therapy (ART) at the Infectious Diseases Institute (IDI) (Routine Cohort) was used. Three methods to estimate mortality after initiation were: 1) standard Kaplan-Meier estimation (uncorrected method) that uses passively observed data; 2) double-sampling methods by Frangakis and Rubin (F&R) where deaths obtained from patient tracing studies are given a higher weight than those passively ascertained; 3) Nomogram proposed by Egger et al. Corrected mortality estimates in the Routine Cohort, were compared with the estimates from the IDI research observational cohort (Research Cohort), which was used as the “gold-standard”. RESULTS: We included 5,633 patients from the Routine Cohort and 559 from the Research Cohort. Uncorrected mortality estimates (95% confidence interval [1]) in the Routine Cohort at 1, 2 and 3 years were 5.5% (4.9%–6.3%), 6.6% (5.9%–7.5%) and 7.4% (6.5%–8.5%), respectively. The F&R corrected estimates at 1, 2 and 3 years were 11.2% (5.8%–21.2%), 15.8% (9.9%–24.8%) and 18.5% (12.3% –27.2%) respectively. The estimates obtained from the Research Cohort were 15.6% (12.8%–18.9%), 17.5% (14.6%–21.0%) and 19.0% (15.3%–21.9%) at 1, 2 and 3 years respectively. Using the nomogram method in the Routine Cohort, the corrected programme-level mortality estimate in year 1 was 11.9% (8.0%–15.7%). CONCLUSION: Mortality adjustments provided by the F&R and nomogram methods are adequate and should be employed to correct mortality for loss-to-follow-up in large HIV care centres in Sub-Saharan Africa. Public Library of Science 2013-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3877043/ /pubmed/24391780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083524 Text en © 2013 Kiragga et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kiragga, Agnes N.
Castelnuovo, Barbara
Musomba, Rachel
Levin, Jonathan
Kambugu, Andrew
Manabe, Yukari C.
Yiannoutsos, Constantin T.
Kiwanuka, Noah
Comparison of Methods for Correction of Mortality Estimates for Loss to Follow-Up after ART Initiation: A Case of the Infectious Diseases Institute, Uganda
title Comparison of Methods for Correction of Mortality Estimates for Loss to Follow-Up after ART Initiation: A Case of the Infectious Diseases Institute, Uganda
title_full Comparison of Methods for Correction of Mortality Estimates for Loss to Follow-Up after ART Initiation: A Case of the Infectious Diseases Institute, Uganda
title_fullStr Comparison of Methods for Correction of Mortality Estimates for Loss to Follow-Up after ART Initiation: A Case of the Infectious Diseases Institute, Uganda
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Methods for Correction of Mortality Estimates for Loss to Follow-Up after ART Initiation: A Case of the Infectious Diseases Institute, Uganda
title_short Comparison of Methods for Correction of Mortality Estimates for Loss to Follow-Up after ART Initiation: A Case of the Infectious Diseases Institute, Uganda
title_sort comparison of methods for correction of mortality estimates for loss to follow-up after art initiation: a case of the infectious diseases institute, uganda
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3877043/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24391780
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083524
work_keys_str_mv AT kiraggaagnesn comparisonofmethodsforcorrectionofmortalityestimatesforlosstofollowupafterartinitiationacaseoftheinfectiousdiseasesinstituteuganda
AT castelnuovobarbara comparisonofmethodsforcorrectionofmortalityestimatesforlosstofollowupafterartinitiationacaseoftheinfectiousdiseasesinstituteuganda
AT musombarachel comparisonofmethodsforcorrectionofmortalityestimatesforlosstofollowupafterartinitiationacaseoftheinfectiousdiseasesinstituteuganda
AT levinjonathan comparisonofmethodsforcorrectionofmortalityestimatesforlosstofollowupafterartinitiationacaseoftheinfectiousdiseasesinstituteuganda
AT kambuguandrew comparisonofmethodsforcorrectionofmortalityestimatesforlosstofollowupafterartinitiationacaseoftheinfectiousdiseasesinstituteuganda
AT manabeyukaric comparisonofmethodsforcorrectionofmortalityestimatesforlosstofollowupafterartinitiationacaseoftheinfectiousdiseasesinstituteuganda
AT yiannoutsosconstantint comparisonofmethodsforcorrectionofmortalityestimatesforlosstofollowupafterartinitiationacaseoftheinfectiousdiseasesinstituteuganda
AT kiwanukanoah comparisonofmethodsforcorrectionofmortalityestimatesforlosstofollowupafterartinitiationacaseoftheinfectiousdiseasesinstituteuganda