Cargando…
Comparison of Methods for Correction of Mortality Estimates for Loss to Follow-Up after ART Initiation: A Case of the Infectious Diseases Institute, Uganda
BACKGROUND: In sub-Saharan Africa, a large proportion of HIV positive patients on antiretroviral therapy (ART) are lost to follow-up, some of whom are dead. The objective of this study was to validate methods used to correct mortality estimates for loss-to-follow-up using a cohort with complete deat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3877043/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24391780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083524 |
_version_ | 1782297579208310784 |
---|---|
author | Kiragga, Agnes N. Castelnuovo, Barbara Musomba, Rachel Levin, Jonathan Kambugu, Andrew Manabe, Yukari C. Yiannoutsos, Constantin T. Kiwanuka, Noah |
author_facet | Kiragga, Agnes N. Castelnuovo, Barbara Musomba, Rachel Levin, Jonathan Kambugu, Andrew Manabe, Yukari C. Yiannoutsos, Constantin T. Kiwanuka, Noah |
author_sort | Kiragga, Agnes N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In sub-Saharan Africa, a large proportion of HIV positive patients on antiretroviral therapy (ART) are lost to follow-up, some of whom are dead. The objective of this study was to validate methods used to correct mortality estimates for loss-to-follow-up using a cohort with complete death ascertainment. METHODS: Routinely collected data from HIV patients initiating first line antiretroviral therapy (ART) at the Infectious Diseases Institute (IDI) (Routine Cohort) was used. Three methods to estimate mortality after initiation were: 1) standard Kaplan-Meier estimation (uncorrected method) that uses passively observed data; 2) double-sampling methods by Frangakis and Rubin (F&R) where deaths obtained from patient tracing studies are given a higher weight than those passively ascertained; 3) Nomogram proposed by Egger et al. Corrected mortality estimates in the Routine Cohort, were compared with the estimates from the IDI research observational cohort (Research Cohort), which was used as the “gold-standard”. RESULTS: We included 5,633 patients from the Routine Cohort and 559 from the Research Cohort. Uncorrected mortality estimates (95% confidence interval [1]) in the Routine Cohort at 1, 2 and 3 years were 5.5% (4.9%–6.3%), 6.6% (5.9%–7.5%) and 7.4% (6.5%–8.5%), respectively. The F&R corrected estimates at 1, 2 and 3 years were 11.2% (5.8%–21.2%), 15.8% (9.9%–24.8%) and 18.5% (12.3% –27.2%) respectively. The estimates obtained from the Research Cohort were 15.6% (12.8%–18.9%), 17.5% (14.6%–21.0%) and 19.0% (15.3%–21.9%) at 1, 2 and 3 years respectively. Using the nomogram method in the Routine Cohort, the corrected programme-level mortality estimate in year 1 was 11.9% (8.0%–15.7%). CONCLUSION: Mortality adjustments provided by the F&R and nomogram methods are adequate and should be employed to correct mortality for loss-to-follow-up in large HIV care centres in Sub-Saharan Africa. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3877043 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38770432014-01-03 Comparison of Methods for Correction of Mortality Estimates for Loss to Follow-Up after ART Initiation: A Case of the Infectious Diseases Institute, Uganda Kiragga, Agnes N. Castelnuovo, Barbara Musomba, Rachel Levin, Jonathan Kambugu, Andrew Manabe, Yukari C. Yiannoutsos, Constantin T. Kiwanuka, Noah PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: In sub-Saharan Africa, a large proportion of HIV positive patients on antiretroviral therapy (ART) are lost to follow-up, some of whom are dead. The objective of this study was to validate methods used to correct mortality estimates for loss-to-follow-up using a cohort with complete death ascertainment. METHODS: Routinely collected data from HIV patients initiating first line antiretroviral therapy (ART) at the Infectious Diseases Institute (IDI) (Routine Cohort) was used. Three methods to estimate mortality after initiation were: 1) standard Kaplan-Meier estimation (uncorrected method) that uses passively observed data; 2) double-sampling methods by Frangakis and Rubin (F&R) where deaths obtained from patient tracing studies are given a higher weight than those passively ascertained; 3) Nomogram proposed by Egger et al. Corrected mortality estimates in the Routine Cohort, were compared with the estimates from the IDI research observational cohort (Research Cohort), which was used as the “gold-standard”. RESULTS: We included 5,633 patients from the Routine Cohort and 559 from the Research Cohort. Uncorrected mortality estimates (95% confidence interval [1]) in the Routine Cohort at 1, 2 and 3 years were 5.5% (4.9%–6.3%), 6.6% (5.9%–7.5%) and 7.4% (6.5%–8.5%), respectively. The F&R corrected estimates at 1, 2 and 3 years were 11.2% (5.8%–21.2%), 15.8% (9.9%–24.8%) and 18.5% (12.3% –27.2%) respectively. The estimates obtained from the Research Cohort were 15.6% (12.8%–18.9%), 17.5% (14.6%–21.0%) and 19.0% (15.3%–21.9%) at 1, 2 and 3 years respectively. Using the nomogram method in the Routine Cohort, the corrected programme-level mortality estimate in year 1 was 11.9% (8.0%–15.7%). CONCLUSION: Mortality adjustments provided by the F&R and nomogram methods are adequate and should be employed to correct mortality for loss-to-follow-up in large HIV care centres in Sub-Saharan Africa. Public Library of Science 2013-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3877043/ /pubmed/24391780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083524 Text en © 2013 Kiragga et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kiragga, Agnes N. Castelnuovo, Barbara Musomba, Rachel Levin, Jonathan Kambugu, Andrew Manabe, Yukari C. Yiannoutsos, Constantin T. Kiwanuka, Noah Comparison of Methods for Correction of Mortality Estimates for Loss to Follow-Up after ART Initiation: A Case of the Infectious Diseases Institute, Uganda |
title | Comparison of Methods for Correction of Mortality Estimates for Loss to Follow-Up after ART Initiation: A Case of the Infectious Diseases Institute, Uganda |
title_full | Comparison of Methods for Correction of Mortality Estimates for Loss to Follow-Up after ART Initiation: A Case of the Infectious Diseases Institute, Uganda |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Methods for Correction of Mortality Estimates for Loss to Follow-Up after ART Initiation: A Case of the Infectious Diseases Institute, Uganda |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Methods for Correction of Mortality Estimates for Loss to Follow-Up after ART Initiation: A Case of the Infectious Diseases Institute, Uganda |
title_short | Comparison of Methods for Correction of Mortality Estimates for Loss to Follow-Up after ART Initiation: A Case of the Infectious Diseases Institute, Uganda |
title_sort | comparison of methods for correction of mortality estimates for loss to follow-up after art initiation: a case of the infectious diseases institute, uganda |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3877043/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24391780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083524 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kiraggaagnesn comparisonofmethodsforcorrectionofmortalityestimatesforlosstofollowupafterartinitiationacaseoftheinfectiousdiseasesinstituteuganda AT castelnuovobarbara comparisonofmethodsforcorrectionofmortalityestimatesforlosstofollowupafterartinitiationacaseoftheinfectiousdiseasesinstituteuganda AT musombarachel comparisonofmethodsforcorrectionofmortalityestimatesforlosstofollowupafterartinitiationacaseoftheinfectiousdiseasesinstituteuganda AT levinjonathan comparisonofmethodsforcorrectionofmortalityestimatesforlosstofollowupafterartinitiationacaseoftheinfectiousdiseasesinstituteuganda AT kambuguandrew comparisonofmethodsforcorrectionofmortalityestimatesforlosstofollowupafterartinitiationacaseoftheinfectiousdiseasesinstituteuganda AT manabeyukaric comparisonofmethodsforcorrectionofmortalityestimatesforlosstofollowupafterartinitiationacaseoftheinfectiousdiseasesinstituteuganda AT yiannoutsosconstantint comparisonofmethodsforcorrectionofmortalityestimatesforlosstofollowupafterartinitiationacaseoftheinfectiousdiseasesinstituteuganda AT kiwanukanoah comparisonofmethodsforcorrectionofmortalityestimatesforlosstofollowupafterartinitiationacaseoftheinfectiousdiseasesinstituteuganda |