Cargando…

Comparison of Different Phenotypic and Genotypic Methods for the Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus

BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus aureus is known as a powerful pathogen that causes various infections. Emergence of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MSRA) is responsible for nosocomial and community-acquired infections worldwide. AIMS: The present study aimed to evaluate the performance and ability of ei...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Farahani, Abbas, Mohajeri, Parviz, Gholamine, Babak, Rezaei, Mansour, Abbasi, Hassan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3877436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24404541
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1947-2714.122305
_version_ 1782297647261941760
author Farahani, Abbas
Mohajeri, Parviz
Gholamine, Babak
Rezaei, Mansour
Abbasi, Hassan
author_facet Farahani, Abbas
Mohajeri, Parviz
Gholamine, Babak
Rezaei, Mansour
Abbasi, Hassan
author_sort Farahani, Abbas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus aureus is known as a powerful pathogen that causes various infections. Emergence of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MSRA) is responsible for nosocomial and community-acquired infections worldwide. AIMS: The present study aimed to evaluate the performance and ability of eight different phenotypic and genotypic methods for the detection of MSRA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 186 S. aureus isolates were defined as methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA; 95) and MSRA (91) using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) as the gold standard. Susceptibility to methicillin was investigated using oxacillin, methicillin, cefotetan, cefoxitin, and cefmetazole disks, by oxacillin Adata Tab and strips. For all S. aureus isolates minimal inhibitory concentrations of oxacillin were determined using the broth microdilution method according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. RESULTS: Among the diagnostic methods studied, broth microdilution and the cefoxitin disk had the highest specificity (98.9 and 94.7%), sensitivity (100 and 98.9%), and concordance with PCR results (98.9 and 93.6%). The cefotetan and cefmetazole disks had the lowest concordance with PCR results. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that microdilution and cefoxitin disk methods have high sensitivities compared with other methods for detection of MSRA. The cefoxitin disk method may be preferred in clinical laboratories because it is easy to perform and does not require special equipment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3877436
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38774362014-01-08 Comparison of Different Phenotypic and Genotypic Methods for the Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Farahani, Abbas Mohajeri, Parviz Gholamine, Babak Rezaei, Mansour Abbasi, Hassan N Am J Med Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus aureus is known as a powerful pathogen that causes various infections. Emergence of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MSRA) is responsible for nosocomial and community-acquired infections worldwide. AIMS: The present study aimed to evaluate the performance and ability of eight different phenotypic and genotypic methods for the detection of MSRA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 186 S. aureus isolates were defined as methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA; 95) and MSRA (91) using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) as the gold standard. Susceptibility to methicillin was investigated using oxacillin, methicillin, cefotetan, cefoxitin, and cefmetazole disks, by oxacillin Adata Tab and strips. For all S. aureus isolates minimal inhibitory concentrations of oxacillin were determined using the broth microdilution method according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. RESULTS: Among the diagnostic methods studied, broth microdilution and the cefoxitin disk had the highest specificity (98.9 and 94.7%), sensitivity (100 and 98.9%), and concordance with PCR results (98.9 and 93.6%). The cefotetan and cefmetazole disks had the lowest concordance with PCR results. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that microdilution and cefoxitin disk methods have high sensitivities compared with other methods for detection of MSRA. The cefoxitin disk method may be preferred in clinical laboratories because it is easy to perform and does not require special equipment. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3877436/ /pubmed/24404541 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1947-2714.122305 Text en Copyright: © North American Journal of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Farahani, Abbas
Mohajeri, Parviz
Gholamine, Babak
Rezaei, Mansour
Abbasi, Hassan
Comparison of Different Phenotypic and Genotypic Methods for the Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
title Comparison of Different Phenotypic and Genotypic Methods for the Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
title_full Comparison of Different Phenotypic and Genotypic Methods for the Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
title_fullStr Comparison of Different Phenotypic and Genotypic Methods for the Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Different Phenotypic and Genotypic Methods for the Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
title_short Comparison of Different Phenotypic and Genotypic Methods for the Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
title_sort comparison of different phenotypic and genotypic methods for the detection of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3877436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24404541
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1947-2714.122305
work_keys_str_mv AT farahaniabbas comparisonofdifferentphenotypicandgenotypicmethodsforthedetectionofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus
AT mohajeriparviz comparisonofdifferentphenotypicandgenotypicmethodsforthedetectionofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus
AT gholaminebabak comparisonofdifferentphenotypicandgenotypicmethodsforthedetectionofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus
AT rezaeimansour comparisonofdifferentphenotypicandgenotypicmethodsforthedetectionofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus
AT abbasihassan comparisonofdifferentphenotypicandgenotypicmethodsforthedetectionofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus