Cargando…

Does PRRT with standard activities of (177)Lu-octreotate really achieve relevant somatostatin receptor saturation in target tumor lesions?: insights from intra-therapeutic receptor imaging in patients with metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

BACKGROUND: Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with (177)Lu-[DOTA(0),Tyr(3)]octreotate ((177)Lu-octreotate) is generally performed using a fixed activity of 7.4 GBq (200 mCi) per course bound to 180 to 300 μg of the peptide. While this single activity may lead to suboptimal radiation doses...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sabet, Amir, Nagarajah, James, Dogan, Ahmet Semih, Biersack, Hans-Jürgen, Sabet, Amin, Guhlke, Stefan, Ezziddin, Samer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3877953/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24369053
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2191-219X-3-82
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with (177)Lu-[DOTA(0),Tyr(3)]octreotate ((177)Lu-octreotate) is generally performed using a fixed activity of 7.4 GBq (200 mCi) per course bound to 180 to 300 μg of the peptide. While this single activity may lead to suboptimal radiation doses in neuroendocrine tumors (NET) with advanced or bulky disease, dose escalation has been withheld due to concerns on potential tumor somatostatin receptor saturation with reduced efficacy of the added activity. In vivo saturation effects during standard-dose PRRT based on quantification of pre- and intra-therapeutic (68)Ga-DOTATOC positron emission tomography (PET) imaging might guide potential dose escalation. METHODS: Five patients with metastatic NET of the pancreas underwent (68)Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT before and directly after standard-dose PRRT with (177)Lu-octreotate. In each patient, four target tumor lesions, normal liver parenchyma, and the spleen were evaluated and the ratios of SUV(max) of the target lesions to liver (SUV(T/L)) and spleen (SUV(T/S)) were calculated; paired Student's t test was performed with p < 0.05 for pre-/intra-PRRT comparisons. RESULTS: The mean intra-therapeutic tumor SUV(max) showed no significant change (per-lesion paired t test) compared to pretreatment values (-9.1%, p = 0.226). In contrast, the SUV(max) of the normal liver parenchyma and spleen were significantly lower directly after infusion of 7.4 GBq (177)Lu-octreotate. Consequently, SUV(T/L) and SUV(T/S) increased significantly from pretreatment to intra-therapeutic examination: SUV(T/L) (p < 0.001) from 2.8 ± 1.3 (1.3 to 5.8) to 4.7 ± 3.0 (2.1 to 12.7) and SUV(T/S) (p < 0.001) from 1.2 ± 0.7 (0.4 to 3.0) to 3.5 ± 1.5 (1.6 to 7.9). CONCLUSIONS: This small retrospective study provides preliminary evidence for the absence of relevant in vivo saturation of somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (sst2) in tumor lesions during PRRT with standard activities of (177)Lu-octreotate in contrast to normal tissue (liver, spleen) showing limited receptor capacity. After being confirmed by larger series, this observation will have significant implications for PRRT: (1) Higher activities of (177)Lu-octreotate might be considered feasible in patients with high tumor disease burden or clinical need for remission, and (2) striving to reduce the amount of peptide used in standard preparations of (177)Lu-octreotate appears futile.