Cargando…
Prognostic value of normal regadenoson stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance
BACKGROUND: Regadenoson is a vasodilator stress agent that selectively activates the A(2A) receptor. Compared to adenosine, regadenoson is easier to administer and results in fewer side effects. Although extensively studied in patients undergoing nuclear perfusion imaging (MPI), its use for perfusio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3878099/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24359617 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-15-108 |
_version_ | 1782297745579573248 |
---|---|
author | Freed, Benjamin H Narang, Akhil Bhave, Nicole M Czobor, Peter Mor-Avi, Victor Zaran, Emily R Turner, Kristen M Cavanaugh, Kevin P Chandra, Sonal Tanaka, Sara M Davidson, Michael H Lang, Roberto M Patel, Amit R |
author_facet | Freed, Benjamin H Narang, Akhil Bhave, Nicole M Czobor, Peter Mor-Avi, Victor Zaran, Emily R Turner, Kristen M Cavanaugh, Kevin P Chandra, Sonal Tanaka, Sara M Davidson, Michael H Lang, Roberto M Patel, Amit R |
author_sort | Freed, Benjamin H |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Regadenoson is a vasodilator stress agent that selectively activates the A(2A) receptor. Compared to adenosine, regadenoson is easier to administer and results in fewer side effects. Although extensively studied in patients undergoing nuclear perfusion imaging (MPI), its use for perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is not well described. The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic value of a normal regadenoson perfusion CMR in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. METHODS: Patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease were prospectively enrolled to receive perfusion CMR (Philips 1.5 T) with regadenoson. Three short-axis slices of the left ventricle (LV) were obtained during first pass of contrast using a hybrid GRE-EPI pulse sequence (0.075 mmol/kg Gadolinium-DTPA-BMA at 4 ml/sec). Imaging was performed 1 minute after injection of regadenoson (0.4 mg) and repeated 15 minutes after reversal of hyperemia with aminophylline (125 mg). Perfusion defects were documented if they persisted for ≥2 frames after peak enhancement of the LV cavity. CMR was considered abnormal if there was a resting wall motion abnormality, decreased LVEF (<40%), presence of LGE, or the presence of a perfusion defect during hyperemia. All patients were followed for a minimum of 1 year for major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) defined as coronary revascularization, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular death. RESULTS: 149 patients were included in the final analysis. Perfusion defects were noted in 43/149 (29%) patients; 59/149 (40%) had any abnormality on CMR. During the mean follow-up period of 24 ± 9 months, 17/149 (11.4%) patients experienced MACE. The separation in the survival distributions for those with perfusion defects and those without perfusion defects was highly significant (log-rank p = 0.0001). When the absence of perfusion defects was added to the absence of other resting CMR abnormalities, the negative predictive value improved from 96% to 99%. CONCLUSION: Regadenoson perfusion CMR provides high confidence for excellent prognosis in patients with normal perfusion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3878099 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38780992014-01-03 Prognostic value of normal regadenoson stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance Freed, Benjamin H Narang, Akhil Bhave, Nicole M Czobor, Peter Mor-Avi, Victor Zaran, Emily R Turner, Kristen M Cavanaugh, Kevin P Chandra, Sonal Tanaka, Sara M Davidson, Michael H Lang, Roberto M Patel, Amit R J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Research BACKGROUND: Regadenoson is a vasodilator stress agent that selectively activates the A(2A) receptor. Compared to adenosine, regadenoson is easier to administer and results in fewer side effects. Although extensively studied in patients undergoing nuclear perfusion imaging (MPI), its use for perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is not well described. The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic value of a normal regadenoson perfusion CMR in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. METHODS: Patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease were prospectively enrolled to receive perfusion CMR (Philips 1.5 T) with regadenoson. Three short-axis slices of the left ventricle (LV) were obtained during first pass of contrast using a hybrid GRE-EPI pulse sequence (0.075 mmol/kg Gadolinium-DTPA-BMA at 4 ml/sec). Imaging was performed 1 minute after injection of regadenoson (0.4 mg) and repeated 15 minutes after reversal of hyperemia with aminophylline (125 mg). Perfusion defects were documented if they persisted for ≥2 frames after peak enhancement of the LV cavity. CMR was considered abnormal if there was a resting wall motion abnormality, decreased LVEF (<40%), presence of LGE, or the presence of a perfusion defect during hyperemia. All patients were followed for a minimum of 1 year for major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) defined as coronary revascularization, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular death. RESULTS: 149 patients were included in the final analysis. Perfusion defects were noted in 43/149 (29%) patients; 59/149 (40%) had any abnormality on CMR. During the mean follow-up period of 24 ± 9 months, 17/149 (11.4%) patients experienced MACE. The separation in the survival distributions for those with perfusion defects and those without perfusion defects was highly significant (log-rank p = 0.0001). When the absence of perfusion defects was added to the absence of other resting CMR abnormalities, the negative predictive value improved from 96% to 99%. CONCLUSION: Regadenoson perfusion CMR provides high confidence for excellent prognosis in patients with normal perfusion. BioMed Central 2013-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3878099/ /pubmed/24359617 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-15-108 Text en Copyright © 2013 Freed et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Freed, Benjamin H Narang, Akhil Bhave, Nicole M Czobor, Peter Mor-Avi, Victor Zaran, Emily R Turner, Kristen M Cavanaugh, Kevin P Chandra, Sonal Tanaka, Sara M Davidson, Michael H Lang, Roberto M Patel, Amit R Prognostic value of normal regadenoson stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance |
title | Prognostic value of normal regadenoson stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance |
title_full | Prognostic value of normal regadenoson stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance |
title_fullStr | Prognostic value of normal regadenoson stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic value of normal regadenoson stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance |
title_short | Prognostic value of normal regadenoson stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance |
title_sort | prognostic value of normal regadenoson stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3878099/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24359617 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-15-108 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT freedbenjaminh prognosticvalueofnormalregadenosonstressperfusioncardiovascularmagneticresonance AT narangakhil prognosticvalueofnormalregadenosonstressperfusioncardiovascularmagneticresonance AT bhavenicolem prognosticvalueofnormalregadenosonstressperfusioncardiovascularmagneticresonance AT czoborpeter prognosticvalueofnormalregadenosonstressperfusioncardiovascularmagneticresonance AT moravivictor prognosticvalueofnormalregadenosonstressperfusioncardiovascularmagneticresonance AT zaranemilyr prognosticvalueofnormalregadenosonstressperfusioncardiovascularmagneticresonance AT turnerkristenm prognosticvalueofnormalregadenosonstressperfusioncardiovascularmagneticresonance AT cavanaughkevinp prognosticvalueofnormalregadenosonstressperfusioncardiovascularmagneticresonance AT chandrasonal prognosticvalueofnormalregadenosonstressperfusioncardiovascularmagneticresonance AT tanakasaram prognosticvalueofnormalregadenosonstressperfusioncardiovascularmagneticresonance AT davidsonmichaelh prognosticvalueofnormalregadenosonstressperfusioncardiovascularmagneticresonance AT langrobertom prognosticvalueofnormalregadenosonstressperfusioncardiovascularmagneticresonance AT patelamitr prognosticvalueofnormalregadenosonstressperfusioncardiovascularmagneticresonance |