Cargando…

Prognostic value of normal regadenoson stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance

BACKGROUND: Regadenoson is a vasodilator stress agent that selectively activates the A(2A) receptor. Compared to adenosine, regadenoson is easier to administer and results in fewer side effects. Although extensively studied in patients undergoing nuclear perfusion imaging (MPI), its use for perfusio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Freed, Benjamin H, Narang, Akhil, Bhave, Nicole M, Czobor, Peter, Mor-Avi, Victor, Zaran, Emily R, Turner, Kristen M, Cavanaugh, Kevin P, Chandra, Sonal, Tanaka, Sara M, Davidson, Michael H, Lang, Roberto M, Patel, Amit R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3878099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24359617
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-15-108
_version_ 1782297745579573248
author Freed, Benjamin H
Narang, Akhil
Bhave, Nicole M
Czobor, Peter
Mor-Avi, Victor
Zaran, Emily R
Turner, Kristen M
Cavanaugh, Kevin P
Chandra, Sonal
Tanaka, Sara M
Davidson, Michael H
Lang, Roberto M
Patel, Amit R
author_facet Freed, Benjamin H
Narang, Akhil
Bhave, Nicole M
Czobor, Peter
Mor-Avi, Victor
Zaran, Emily R
Turner, Kristen M
Cavanaugh, Kevin P
Chandra, Sonal
Tanaka, Sara M
Davidson, Michael H
Lang, Roberto M
Patel, Amit R
author_sort Freed, Benjamin H
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Regadenoson is a vasodilator stress agent that selectively activates the A(2A) receptor. Compared to adenosine, regadenoson is easier to administer and results in fewer side effects. Although extensively studied in patients undergoing nuclear perfusion imaging (MPI), its use for perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is not well described. The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic value of a normal regadenoson perfusion CMR in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. METHODS: Patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease were prospectively enrolled to receive perfusion CMR (Philips 1.5 T) with regadenoson. Three short-axis slices of the left ventricle (LV) were obtained during first pass of contrast using a hybrid GRE-EPI pulse sequence (0.075 mmol/kg Gadolinium-DTPA-BMA at 4 ml/sec). Imaging was performed 1 minute after injection of regadenoson (0.4 mg) and repeated 15 minutes after reversal of hyperemia with aminophylline (125 mg). Perfusion defects were documented if they persisted for ≥2 frames after peak enhancement of the LV cavity. CMR was considered abnormal if there was a resting wall motion abnormality, decreased LVEF (<40%), presence of LGE, or the presence of a perfusion defect during hyperemia. All patients were followed for a minimum of 1 year for major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) defined as coronary revascularization, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular death. RESULTS: 149 patients were included in the final analysis. Perfusion defects were noted in 43/149 (29%) patients; 59/149 (40%) had any abnormality on CMR. During the mean follow-up period of 24 ± 9 months, 17/149 (11.4%) patients experienced MACE. The separation in the survival distributions for those with perfusion defects and those without perfusion defects was highly significant (log-rank p = 0.0001). When the absence of perfusion defects was added to the absence of other resting CMR abnormalities, the negative predictive value improved from 96% to 99%. CONCLUSION: Regadenoson perfusion CMR provides high confidence for excellent prognosis in patients with normal perfusion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3878099
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38780992014-01-03 Prognostic value of normal regadenoson stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance Freed, Benjamin H Narang, Akhil Bhave, Nicole M Czobor, Peter Mor-Avi, Victor Zaran, Emily R Turner, Kristen M Cavanaugh, Kevin P Chandra, Sonal Tanaka, Sara M Davidson, Michael H Lang, Roberto M Patel, Amit R J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Research BACKGROUND: Regadenoson is a vasodilator stress agent that selectively activates the A(2A) receptor. Compared to adenosine, regadenoson is easier to administer and results in fewer side effects. Although extensively studied in patients undergoing nuclear perfusion imaging (MPI), its use for perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is not well described. The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic value of a normal regadenoson perfusion CMR in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. METHODS: Patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease were prospectively enrolled to receive perfusion CMR (Philips 1.5 T) with regadenoson. Three short-axis slices of the left ventricle (LV) were obtained during first pass of contrast using a hybrid GRE-EPI pulse sequence (0.075 mmol/kg Gadolinium-DTPA-BMA at 4 ml/sec). Imaging was performed 1 minute after injection of regadenoson (0.4 mg) and repeated 15 minutes after reversal of hyperemia with aminophylline (125 mg). Perfusion defects were documented if they persisted for ≥2 frames after peak enhancement of the LV cavity. CMR was considered abnormal if there was a resting wall motion abnormality, decreased LVEF (<40%), presence of LGE, or the presence of a perfusion defect during hyperemia. All patients were followed for a minimum of 1 year for major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) defined as coronary revascularization, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular death. RESULTS: 149 patients were included in the final analysis. Perfusion defects were noted in 43/149 (29%) patients; 59/149 (40%) had any abnormality on CMR. During the mean follow-up period of 24 ± 9 months, 17/149 (11.4%) patients experienced MACE. The separation in the survival distributions for those with perfusion defects and those without perfusion defects was highly significant (log-rank p = 0.0001). When the absence of perfusion defects was added to the absence of other resting CMR abnormalities, the negative predictive value improved from 96% to 99%. CONCLUSION: Regadenoson perfusion CMR provides high confidence for excellent prognosis in patients with normal perfusion. BioMed Central 2013-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3878099/ /pubmed/24359617 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-15-108 Text en Copyright © 2013 Freed et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Freed, Benjamin H
Narang, Akhil
Bhave, Nicole M
Czobor, Peter
Mor-Avi, Victor
Zaran, Emily R
Turner, Kristen M
Cavanaugh, Kevin P
Chandra, Sonal
Tanaka, Sara M
Davidson, Michael H
Lang, Roberto M
Patel, Amit R
Prognostic value of normal regadenoson stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance
title Prognostic value of normal regadenoson stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance
title_full Prognostic value of normal regadenoson stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance
title_fullStr Prognostic value of normal regadenoson stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic value of normal regadenoson stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance
title_short Prognostic value of normal regadenoson stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance
title_sort prognostic value of normal regadenoson stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3878099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24359617
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-15-108
work_keys_str_mv AT freedbenjaminh prognosticvalueofnormalregadenosonstressperfusioncardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT narangakhil prognosticvalueofnormalregadenosonstressperfusioncardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT bhavenicolem prognosticvalueofnormalregadenosonstressperfusioncardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT czoborpeter prognosticvalueofnormalregadenosonstressperfusioncardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT moravivictor prognosticvalueofnormalregadenosonstressperfusioncardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT zaranemilyr prognosticvalueofnormalregadenosonstressperfusioncardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT turnerkristenm prognosticvalueofnormalregadenosonstressperfusioncardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT cavanaughkevinp prognosticvalueofnormalregadenosonstressperfusioncardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT chandrasonal prognosticvalueofnormalregadenosonstressperfusioncardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT tanakasaram prognosticvalueofnormalregadenosonstressperfusioncardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT davidsonmichaelh prognosticvalueofnormalregadenosonstressperfusioncardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT langrobertom prognosticvalueofnormalregadenosonstressperfusioncardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT patelamitr prognosticvalueofnormalregadenosonstressperfusioncardiovascularmagneticresonance