Cargando…

Rates of thyroid malignancy by FNA diagnostic category

BACKGROUND: Fine needle aspiration (FNA) of thyroid nodules is a cornerstone of surgical decision making in thyroid cancer. The most widely utilized system for reporting thyroid FNA results is the Bethesda System, which includes predicted malignancy rates for each FNA category. To date there have be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Williams, Blair A, Bullock, Martin J, Trites, Jonathan R, Taylor, S Mark, Hart, Robert D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3878187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24359603
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1916-0216-42-61
_version_ 1782297757168435200
author Williams, Blair A
Bullock, Martin J
Trites, Jonathan R
Taylor, S Mark
Hart, Robert D
author_facet Williams, Blair A
Bullock, Martin J
Trites, Jonathan R
Taylor, S Mark
Hart, Robert D
author_sort Williams, Blair A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Fine needle aspiration (FNA) of thyroid nodules is a cornerstone of surgical decision making in thyroid cancer. The most widely utilized system for reporting thyroid FNA results is the Bethesda System, which includes predicted malignancy rates for each FNA category. To date there have been few studies to determine whether these predictions are widely applicable. METHODS: All thyroid FNA results at the Queen Elizabeth II Health Science Centre from 2006–2010 were included in this study. The results were tabulated by FNA category and the health records were reviewed to determine whether the patient went on to have surgery and the result of surgical histopathology. Rates of malignancy were calculated and compared to published values. RESULTS: A total of 1491 thyroid FNAs were included in the study, representing 1117 individual patients with available health records. The majority of these FNAs were Benign, but the proportion of Unsatisfactory FNAs was higher than predicted while Malignant and Suspicious for Malignancy were lower than predicted. Surgery was performed on 388 patients and 110 were positive for malignancy (28%). The malignancy rate for each FNA category was higher than predicted based on literature values. CONCLUSIONS: The proportions of FNA diagnoses and the rates of malignancy for each FNA category at our institution were not consistent with predicted values. It is important for clinicians to base their surgical recommendations on institution specific malignancy rates, not solely on literature values.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3878187
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38781872014-01-07 Rates of thyroid malignancy by FNA diagnostic category Williams, Blair A Bullock, Martin J Trites, Jonathan R Taylor, S Mark Hart, Robert D J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Fine needle aspiration (FNA) of thyroid nodules is a cornerstone of surgical decision making in thyroid cancer. The most widely utilized system for reporting thyroid FNA results is the Bethesda System, which includes predicted malignancy rates for each FNA category. To date there have been few studies to determine whether these predictions are widely applicable. METHODS: All thyroid FNA results at the Queen Elizabeth II Health Science Centre from 2006–2010 were included in this study. The results were tabulated by FNA category and the health records were reviewed to determine whether the patient went on to have surgery and the result of surgical histopathology. Rates of malignancy were calculated and compared to published values. RESULTS: A total of 1491 thyroid FNAs were included in the study, representing 1117 individual patients with available health records. The majority of these FNAs were Benign, but the proportion of Unsatisfactory FNAs was higher than predicted while Malignant and Suspicious for Malignancy were lower than predicted. Surgery was performed on 388 patients and 110 were positive for malignancy (28%). The malignancy rate for each FNA category was higher than predicted based on literature values. CONCLUSIONS: The proportions of FNA diagnoses and the rates of malignancy for each FNA category at our institution were not consistent with predicted values. It is important for clinicians to base their surgical recommendations on institution specific malignancy rates, not solely on literature values. BioMed Central 2013-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3878187/ /pubmed/24359603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1916-0216-42-61 Text en Copyright © 2013 Williams et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Williams, Blair A
Bullock, Martin J
Trites, Jonathan R
Taylor, S Mark
Hart, Robert D
Rates of thyroid malignancy by FNA diagnostic category
title Rates of thyroid malignancy by FNA diagnostic category
title_full Rates of thyroid malignancy by FNA diagnostic category
title_fullStr Rates of thyroid malignancy by FNA diagnostic category
title_full_unstemmed Rates of thyroid malignancy by FNA diagnostic category
title_short Rates of thyroid malignancy by FNA diagnostic category
title_sort rates of thyroid malignancy by fna diagnostic category
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3878187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24359603
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1916-0216-42-61
work_keys_str_mv AT williamsblaira ratesofthyroidmalignancybyfnadiagnosticcategory
AT bullockmartinj ratesofthyroidmalignancybyfnadiagnosticcategory
AT tritesjonathanr ratesofthyroidmalignancybyfnadiagnosticcategory
AT taylorsmark ratesofthyroidmalignancybyfnadiagnosticcategory
AT hartrobertd ratesofthyroidmalignancybyfnadiagnosticcategory