Cargando…
A crossover pilot study evaluating the functional outcomes of two different types of robotic movement training in chronic stroke survivors using the arm exoskeleton BONES
BACKGROUND: To date, the limited degrees of freedom (DOF) of most robotic training devices hinders them from providing functional training following stroke. We developed a 6-DOF exoskeleton (“BONES”) that allows movement of the upper limb to assist in rehabilitation. The objectives of this pilot stu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3878268/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24354476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-10-112 |
_version_ | 1782297773636321280 |
---|---|
author | Milot, Marie-Hélène Spencer, Steven J Chan, Vicky Allington, James P Klein, Julius Chou, Cathy Bobrow, James E Cramer, Steven C Reinkensmeyer, David J |
author_facet | Milot, Marie-Hélène Spencer, Steven J Chan, Vicky Allington, James P Klein, Julius Chou, Cathy Bobrow, James E Cramer, Steven C Reinkensmeyer, David J |
author_sort | Milot, Marie-Hélène |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To date, the limited degrees of freedom (DOF) of most robotic training devices hinders them from providing functional training following stroke. We developed a 6-DOF exoskeleton (“BONES”) that allows movement of the upper limb to assist in rehabilitation. The objectives of this pilot study were to evaluate the impact of training with BONES on function of the affected upper limb, and to assess whether multijoint functional robotic training would translate into greater gains in arm function than single joint robotic training also conducted with BONES. METHODS: Twenty subjects with mild to moderate chronic stroke participated in this crossover study. Each subject experienced multijoint functional training and single joint training three sessions per week, for four weeks, with the order of presentation randomized. The primary outcome measure was the change in Box and Block Test (BBT). The secondary outcome measures were the changes in Fugl-Meyer Arm Motor Scale (FMA), Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), Motor Activity Log (MAL), and quantitative measures of strength and speed of reaching. These measures were assessed at baseline, after each training period, and at a 3-month follow-up evaluation session. RESULTS: Training with the robotic exoskeleton resulted in significant improvements in the BBT, FMA, WMFT, MAL, shoulder and elbow strength, and reaching speed (p < 0.05); these improvements were sustained at the 3 month follow-up. When comparing the effect of type of training on the gains obtained, no significant difference was noted between multijoint functional and single joint robotic training programs. However, for the BBT, WMFT and MAL, inequality of carryover effects were noted; subsequent analysis on the change in score between the baseline and first period of training again revealed no difference in the gains obtained between the types of training. CONCLUSIONS: Training with the 6 DOF arm exoskeleton improved motor function after chronic stroke, challenging the idea that robotic therapy is only useful for impairment reduction. The pilot results presented here also suggest that multijoint functional robotic training is not decisively superior to single joint robotic training. This challenges the idea that functionally-oriented games during training is a key element for improving behavioral outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01050231. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3878268 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38782682014-01-03 A crossover pilot study evaluating the functional outcomes of two different types of robotic movement training in chronic stroke survivors using the arm exoskeleton BONES Milot, Marie-Hélène Spencer, Steven J Chan, Vicky Allington, James P Klein, Julius Chou, Cathy Bobrow, James E Cramer, Steven C Reinkensmeyer, David J J Neuroeng Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: To date, the limited degrees of freedom (DOF) of most robotic training devices hinders them from providing functional training following stroke. We developed a 6-DOF exoskeleton (“BONES”) that allows movement of the upper limb to assist in rehabilitation. The objectives of this pilot study were to evaluate the impact of training with BONES on function of the affected upper limb, and to assess whether multijoint functional robotic training would translate into greater gains in arm function than single joint robotic training also conducted with BONES. METHODS: Twenty subjects with mild to moderate chronic stroke participated in this crossover study. Each subject experienced multijoint functional training and single joint training three sessions per week, for four weeks, with the order of presentation randomized. The primary outcome measure was the change in Box and Block Test (BBT). The secondary outcome measures were the changes in Fugl-Meyer Arm Motor Scale (FMA), Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), Motor Activity Log (MAL), and quantitative measures of strength and speed of reaching. These measures were assessed at baseline, after each training period, and at a 3-month follow-up evaluation session. RESULTS: Training with the robotic exoskeleton resulted in significant improvements in the BBT, FMA, WMFT, MAL, shoulder and elbow strength, and reaching speed (p < 0.05); these improvements were sustained at the 3 month follow-up. When comparing the effect of type of training on the gains obtained, no significant difference was noted between multijoint functional and single joint robotic training programs. However, for the BBT, WMFT and MAL, inequality of carryover effects were noted; subsequent analysis on the change in score between the baseline and first period of training again revealed no difference in the gains obtained between the types of training. CONCLUSIONS: Training with the 6 DOF arm exoskeleton improved motor function after chronic stroke, challenging the idea that robotic therapy is only useful for impairment reduction. The pilot results presented here also suggest that multijoint functional robotic training is not decisively superior to single joint robotic training. This challenges the idea that functionally-oriented games during training is a key element for improving behavioral outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01050231. BioMed Central 2013-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3878268/ /pubmed/24354476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-10-112 Text en Copyright © 2013 Milot et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Milot, Marie-Hélène Spencer, Steven J Chan, Vicky Allington, James P Klein, Julius Chou, Cathy Bobrow, James E Cramer, Steven C Reinkensmeyer, David J A crossover pilot study evaluating the functional outcomes of two different types of robotic movement training in chronic stroke survivors using the arm exoskeleton BONES |
title | A crossover pilot study evaluating the functional outcomes of two different types of robotic movement training in chronic stroke survivors using the arm exoskeleton BONES |
title_full | A crossover pilot study evaluating the functional outcomes of two different types of robotic movement training in chronic stroke survivors using the arm exoskeleton BONES |
title_fullStr | A crossover pilot study evaluating the functional outcomes of two different types of robotic movement training in chronic stroke survivors using the arm exoskeleton BONES |
title_full_unstemmed | A crossover pilot study evaluating the functional outcomes of two different types of robotic movement training in chronic stroke survivors using the arm exoskeleton BONES |
title_short | A crossover pilot study evaluating the functional outcomes of two different types of robotic movement training in chronic stroke survivors using the arm exoskeleton BONES |
title_sort | crossover pilot study evaluating the functional outcomes of two different types of robotic movement training in chronic stroke survivors using the arm exoskeleton bones |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3878268/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24354476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-10-112 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT milotmariehelene acrossoverpilotstudyevaluatingthefunctionaloutcomesoftwodifferenttypesofroboticmovementtraininginchronicstrokesurvivorsusingthearmexoskeletonbones AT spencerstevenj acrossoverpilotstudyevaluatingthefunctionaloutcomesoftwodifferenttypesofroboticmovementtraininginchronicstrokesurvivorsusingthearmexoskeletonbones AT chanvicky acrossoverpilotstudyevaluatingthefunctionaloutcomesoftwodifferenttypesofroboticmovementtraininginchronicstrokesurvivorsusingthearmexoskeletonbones AT allingtonjamesp acrossoverpilotstudyevaluatingthefunctionaloutcomesoftwodifferenttypesofroboticmovementtraininginchronicstrokesurvivorsusingthearmexoskeletonbones AT kleinjulius acrossoverpilotstudyevaluatingthefunctionaloutcomesoftwodifferenttypesofroboticmovementtraininginchronicstrokesurvivorsusingthearmexoskeletonbones AT choucathy acrossoverpilotstudyevaluatingthefunctionaloutcomesoftwodifferenttypesofroboticmovementtraininginchronicstrokesurvivorsusingthearmexoskeletonbones AT bobrowjamese acrossoverpilotstudyevaluatingthefunctionaloutcomesoftwodifferenttypesofroboticmovementtraininginchronicstrokesurvivorsusingthearmexoskeletonbones AT cramerstevenc acrossoverpilotstudyevaluatingthefunctionaloutcomesoftwodifferenttypesofroboticmovementtraininginchronicstrokesurvivorsusingthearmexoskeletonbones AT reinkensmeyerdavidj acrossoverpilotstudyevaluatingthefunctionaloutcomesoftwodifferenttypesofroboticmovementtraininginchronicstrokesurvivorsusingthearmexoskeletonbones AT milotmariehelene crossoverpilotstudyevaluatingthefunctionaloutcomesoftwodifferenttypesofroboticmovementtraininginchronicstrokesurvivorsusingthearmexoskeletonbones AT spencerstevenj crossoverpilotstudyevaluatingthefunctionaloutcomesoftwodifferenttypesofroboticmovementtraininginchronicstrokesurvivorsusingthearmexoskeletonbones AT chanvicky crossoverpilotstudyevaluatingthefunctionaloutcomesoftwodifferenttypesofroboticmovementtraininginchronicstrokesurvivorsusingthearmexoskeletonbones AT allingtonjamesp crossoverpilotstudyevaluatingthefunctionaloutcomesoftwodifferenttypesofroboticmovementtraininginchronicstrokesurvivorsusingthearmexoskeletonbones AT kleinjulius crossoverpilotstudyevaluatingthefunctionaloutcomesoftwodifferenttypesofroboticmovementtraininginchronicstrokesurvivorsusingthearmexoskeletonbones AT choucathy crossoverpilotstudyevaluatingthefunctionaloutcomesoftwodifferenttypesofroboticmovementtraininginchronicstrokesurvivorsusingthearmexoskeletonbones AT bobrowjamese crossoverpilotstudyevaluatingthefunctionaloutcomesoftwodifferenttypesofroboticmovementtraininginchronicstrokesurvivorsusingthearmexoskeletonbones AT cramerstevenc crossoverpilotstudyevaluatingthefunctionaloutcomesoftwodifferenttypesofroboticmovementtraininginchronicstrokesurvivorsusingthearmexoskeletonbones AT reinkensmeyerdavidj crossoverpilotstudyevaluatingthefunctionaloutcomesoftwodifferenttypesofroboticmovementtraininginchronicstrokesurvivorsusingthearmexoskeletonbones |