Cargando…

A crossover pilot study evaluating the functional outcomes of two different types of robotic movement training in chronic stroke survivors using the arm exoskeleton BONES

BACKGROUND: To date, the limited degrees of freedom (DOF) of most robotic training devices hinders them from providing functional training following stroke. We developed a 6-DOF exoskeleton (“BONES”) that allows movement of the upper limb to assist in rehabilitation. The objectives of this pilot stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Milot, Marie-Hélène, Spencer, Steven J, Chan, Vicky, Allington, James P, Klein, Julius, Chou, Cathy, Bobrow, James E, Cramer, Steven C, Reinkensmeyer, David J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3878268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24354476
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-10-112
_version_ 1782297773636321280
author Milot, Marie-Hélène
Spencer, Steven J
Chan, Vicky
Allington, James P
Klein, Julius
Chou, Cathy
Bobrow, James E
Cramer, Steven C
Reinkensmeyer, David J
author_facet Milot, Marie-Hélène
Spencer, Steven J
Chan, Vicky
Allington, James P
Klein, Julius
Chou, Cathy
Bobrow, James E
Cramer, Steven C
Reinkensmeyer, David J
author_sort Milot, Marie-Hélène
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To date, the limited degrees of freedom (DOF) of most robotic training devices hinders them from providing functional training following stroke. We developed a 6-DOF exoskeleton (“BONES”) that allows movement of the upper limb to assist in rehabilitation. The objectives of this pilot study were to evaluate the impact of training with BONES on function of the affected upper limb, and to assess whether multijoint functional robotic training would translate into greater gains in arm function than single joint robotic training also conducted with BONES. METHODS: Twenty subjects with mild to moderate chronic stroke participated in this crossover study. Each subject experienced multijoint functional training and single joint training three sessions per week, for four weeks, with the order of presentation randomized. The primary outcome measure was the change in Box and Block Test (BBT). The secondary outcome measures were the changes in Fugl-Meyer Arm Motor Scale (FMA), Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), Motor Activity Log (MAL), and quantitative measures of strength and speed of reaching. These measures were assessed at baseline, after each training period, and at a 3-month follow-up evaluation session. RESULTS: Training with the robotic exoskeleton resulted in significant improvements in the BBT, FMA, WMFT, MAL, shoulder and elbow strength, and reaching speed (p < 0.05); these improvements were sustained at the 3 month follow-up. When comparing the effect of type of training on the gains obtained, no significant difference was noted between multijoint functional and single joint robotic training programs. However, for the BBT, WMFT and MAL, inequality of carryover effects were noted; subsequent analysis on the change in score between the baseline and first period of training again revealed no difference in the gains obtained between the types of training. CONCLUSIONS: Training with the 6 DOF arm exoskeleton improved motor function after chronic stroke, challenging the idea that robotic therapy is only useful for impairment reduction. The pilot results presented here also suggest that multijoint functional robotic training is not decisively superior to single joint robotic training. This challenges the idea that functionally-oriented games during training is a key element for improving behavioral outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01050231.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3878268
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38782682014-01-03 A crossover pilot study evaluating the functional outcomes of two different types of robotic movement training in chronic stroke survivors using the arm exoskeleton BONES Milot, Marie-Hélène Spencer, Steven J Chan, Vicky Allington, James P Klein, Julius Chou, Cathy Bobrow, James E Cramer, Steven C Reinkensmeyer, David J J Neuroeng Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: To date, the limited degrees of freedom (DOF) of most robotic training devices hinders them from providing functional training following stroke. We developed a 6-DOF exoskeleton (“BONES”) that allows movement of the upper limb to assist in rehabilitation. The objectives of this pilot study were to evaluate the impact of training with BONES on function of the affected upper limb, and to assess whether multijoint functional robotic training would translate into greater gains in arm function than single joint robotic training also conducted with BONES. METHODS: Twenty subjects with mild to moderate chronic stroke participated in this crossover study. Each subject experienced multijoint functional training and single joint training three sessions per week, for four weeks, with the order of presentation randomized. The primary outcome measure was the change in Box and Block Test (BBT). The secondary outcome measures were the changes in Fugl-Meyer Arm Motor Scale (FMA), Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), Motor Activity Log (MAL), and quantitative measures of strength and speed of reaching. These measures were assessed at baseline, after each training period, and at a 3-month follow-up evaluation session. RESULTS: Training with the robotic exoskeleton resulted in significant improvements in the BBT, FMA, WMFT, MAL, shoulder and elbow strength, and reaching speed (p < 0.05); these improvements were sustained at the 3 month follow-up. When comparing the effect of type of training on the gains obtained, no significant difference was noted between multijoint functional and single joint robotic training programs. However, for the BBT, WMFT and MAL, inequality of carryover effects were noted; subsequent analysis on the change in score between the baseline and first period of training again revealed no difference in the gains obtained between the types of training. CONCLUSIONS: Training with the 6 DOF arm exoskeleton improved motor function after chronic stroke, challenging the idea that robotic therapy is only useful for impairment reduction. The pilot results presented here also suggest that multijoint functional robotic training is not decisively superior to single joint robotic training. This challenges the idea that functionally-oriented games during training is a key element for improving behavioral outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01050231. BioMed Central 2013-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3878268/ /pubmed/24354476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-10-112 Text en Copyright © 2013 Milot et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Milot, Marie-Hélène
Spencer, Steven J
Chan, Vicky
Allington, James P
Klein, Julius
Chou, Cathy
Bobrow, James E
Cramer, Steven C
Reinkensmeyer, David J
A crossover pilot study evaluating the functional outcomes of two different types of robotic movement training in chronic stroke survivors using the arm exoskeleton BONES
title A crossover pilot study evaluating the functional outcomes of two different types of robotic movement training in chronic stroke survivors using the arm exoskeleton BONES
title_full A crossover pilot study evaluating the functional outcomes of two different types of robotic movement training in chronic stroke survivors using the arm exoskeleton BONES
title_fullStr A crossover pilot study evaluating the functional outcomes of two different types of robotic movement training in chronic stroke survivors using the arm exoskeleton BONES
title_full_unstemmed A crossover pilot study evaluating the functional outcomes of two different types of robotic movement training in chronic stroke survivors using the arm exoskeleton BONES
title_short A crossover pilot study evaluating the functional outcomes of two different types of robotic movement training in chronic stroke survivors using the arm exoskeleton BONES
title_sort crossover pilot study evaluating the functional outcomes of two different types of robotic movement training in chronic stroke survivors using the arm exoskeleton bones
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3878268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24354476
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-10-112
work_keys_str_mv AT milotmariehelene acrossoverpilotstudyevaluatingthefunctionaloutcomesoftwodifferenttypesofroboticmovementtraininginchronicstrokesurvivorsusingthearmexoskeletonbones
AT spencerstevenj acrossoverpilotstudyevaluatingthefunctionaloutcomesoftwodifferenttypesofroboticmovementtraininginchronicstrokesurvivorsusingthearmexoskeletonbones
AT chanvicky acrossoverpilotstudyevaluatingthefunctionaloutcomesoftwodifferenttypesofroboticmovementtraininginchronicstrokesurvivorsusingthearmexoskeletonbones
AT allingtonjamesp acrossoverpilotstudyevaluatingthefunctionaloutcomesoftwodifferenttypesofroboticmovementtraininginchronicstrokesurvivorsusingthearmexoskeletonbones
AT kleinjulius acrossoverpilotstudyevaluatingthefunctionaloutcomesoftwodifferenttypesofroboticmovementtraininginchronicstrokesurvivorsusingthearmexoskeletonbones
AT choucathy acrossoverpilotstudyevaluatingthefunctionaloutcomesoftwodifferenttypesofroboticmovementtraininginchronicstrokesurvivorsusingthearmexoskeletonbones
AT bobrowjamese acrossoverpilotstudyevaluatingthefunctionaloutcomesoftwodifferenttypesofroboticmovementtraininginchronicstrokesurvivorsusingthearmexoskeletonbones
AT cramerstevenc acrossoverpilotstudyevaluatingthefunctionaloutcomesoftwodifferenttypesofroboticmovementtraininginchronicstrokesurvivorsusingthearmexoskeletonbones
AT reinkensmeyerdavidj acrossoverpilotstudyevaluatingthefunctionaloutcomesoftwodifferenttypesofroboticmovementtraininginchronicstrokesurvivorsusingthearmexoskeletonbones
AT milotmariehelene crossoverpilotstudyevaluatingthefunctionaloutcomesoftwodifferenttypesofroboticmovementtraininginchronicstrokesurvivorsusingthearmexoskeletonbones
AT spencerstevenj crossoverpilotstudyevaluatingthefunctionaloutcomesoftwodifferenttypesofroboticmovementtraininginchronicstrokesurvivorsusingthearmexoskeletonbones
AT chanvicky crossoverpilotstudyevaluatingthefunctionaloutcomesoftwodifferenttypesofroboticmovementtraininginchronicstrokesurvivorsusingthearmexoskeletonbones
AT allingtonjamesp crossoverpilotstudyevaluatingthefunctionaloutcomesoftwodifferenttypesofroboticmovementtraininginchronicstrokesurvivorsusingthearmexoskeletonbones
AT kleinjulius crossoverpilotstudyevaluatingthefunctionaloutcomesoftwodifferenttypesofroboticmovementtraininginchronicstrokesurvivorsusingthearmexoskeletonbones
AT choucathy crossoverpilotstudyevaluatingthefunctionaloutcomesoftwodifferenttypesofroboticmovementtraininginchronicstrokesurvivorsusingthearmexoskeletonbones
AT bobrowjamese crossoverpilotstudyevaluatingthefunctionaloutcomesoftwodifferenttypesofroboticmovementtraininginchronicstrokesurvivorsusingthearmexoskeletonbones
AT cramerstevenc crossoverpilotstudyevaluatingthefunctionaloutcomesoftwodifferenttypesofroboticmovementtraininginchronicstrokesurvivorsusingthearmexoskeletonbones
AT reinkensmeyerdavidj crossoverpilotstudyevaluatingthefunctionaloutcomesoftwodifferenttypesofroboticmovementtraininginchronicstrokesurvivorsusingthearmexoskeletonbones