Cargando…

Haemoglobin A1c: comparing performance of two point of care devices with laboratory analyser

BACKGROUND: Measurement of HbA1c has been widely used for long-term monitoring and management of diabetes control. There is increasing use of point-of-care (POC) devices for measuring HbA1c where quicker results would allow immediate clinical management decisions to be made. Therefore, it is importa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wan Mohd Zin, Ruziana Mona, Ahmad Kamil, Zati Iwani, Tuan Soh, Tuan Rosidah, Embong, Mustaffa, Wan Mohamud, Wan Nazaimoon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3878320/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24344903
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-6-540
_version_ 1782297780750909440
author Wan Mohd Zin, Ruziana Mona
Ahmad Kamil, Zati Iwani
Tuan Soh, Tuan Rosidah
Embong, Mustaffa
Wan Mohamud, Wan Nazaimoon
author_facet Wan Mohd Zin, Ruziana Mona
Ahmad Kamil, Zati Iwani
Tuan Soh, Tuan Rosidah
Embong, Mustaffa
Wan Mohamud, Wan Nazaimoon
author_sort Wan Mohd Zin, Ruziana Mona
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Measurement of HbA1c has been widely used for long-term monitoring and management of diabetes control. There is increasing use of point-of-care (POC) devices for measuring HbA1c where quicker results would allow immediate clinical management decisions to be made. Therefore, it is important to evaluate and compare the performance of such devices to the reference laboratory method. FINDINGS: A total of 274 venous blood was collected from normal healthy adults during the community screening programmes. The performance of POC devices, Afinion and Quo-test were compared to central laboratory HPLC method; Adams A1c HA 8160. Both POC devices showed good correlation to HA 8160 with r = 0.94 (p < 0.001) and r = 0.95 (p < 0.001) for Afinion and Quo-test respectively. The means difference were statistically higher between POC and HA 8160 with 0.23% (95% CI 0.19-0.26, p < 0.001) and 0.29% (95% CI 0.24-0.34, p < 0.001) for Afinion and Quo-test respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Both POC devices could be considered in health clinics for diabetes management but not to be used for the diagnostic purposes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3878320
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38783202014-01-03 Haemoglobin A1c: comparing performance of two point of care devices with laboratory analyser Wan Mohd Zin, Ruziana Mona Ahmad Kamil, Zati Iwani Tuan Soh, Tuan Rosidah Embong, Mustaffa Wan Mohamud, Wan Nazaimoon BMC Res Notes Short Report BACKGROUND: Measurement of HbA1c has been widely used for long-term monitoring and management of diabetes control. There is increasing use of point-of-care (POC) devices for measuring HbA1c where quicker results would allow immediate clinical management decisions to be made. Therefore, it is important to evaluate and compare the performance of such devices to the reference laboratory method. FINDINGS: A total of 274 venous blood was collected from normal healthy adults during the community screening programmes. The performance of POC devices, Afinion and Quo-test were compared to central laboratory HPLC method; Adams A1c HA 8160. Both POC devices showed good correlation to HA 8160 with r = 0.94 (p < 0.001) and r = 0.95 (p < 0.001) for Afinion and Quo-test respectively. The means difference were statistically higher between POC and HA 8160 with 0.23% (95% CI 0.19-0.26, p < 0.001) and 0.29% (95% CI 0.24-0.34, p < 0.001) for Afinion and Quo-test respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Both POC devices could be considered in health clinics for diabetes management but not to be used for the diagnostic purposes. BioMed Central 2013-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3878320/ /pubmed/24344903 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-6-540 Text en Copyright © 2013 Wan Mohd Zin et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Short Report
Wan Mohd Zin, Ruziana Mona
Ahmad Kamil, Zati Iwani
Tuan Soh, Tuan Rosidah
Embong, Mustaffa
Wan Mohamud, Wan Nazaimoon
Haemoglobin A1c: comparing performance of two point of care devices with laboratory analyser
title Haemoglobin A1c: comparing performance of two point of care devices with laboratory analyser
title_full Haemoglobin A1c: comparing performance of two point of care devices with laboratory analyser
title_fullStr Haemoglobin A1c: comparing performance of two point of care devices with laboratory analyser
title_full_unstemmed Haemoglobin A1c: comparing performance of two point of care devices with laboratory analyser
title_short Haemoglobin A1c: comparing performance of two point of care devices with laboratory analyser
title_sort haemoglobin a1c: comparing performance of two point of care devices with laboratory analyser
topic Short Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3878320/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24344903
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-6-540
work_keys_str_mv AT wanmohdzinruzianamona haemoglobina1ccomparingperformanceoftwopointofcaredeviceswithlaboratoryanalyser
AT ahmadkamilzatiiwani haemoglobina1ccomparingperformanceoftwopointofcaredeviceswithlaboratoryanalyser
AT tuansohtuanrosidah haemoglobina1ccomparingperformanceoftwopointofcaredeviceswithlaboratoryanalyser
AT embongmustaffa haemoglobina1ccomparingperformanceoftwopointofcaredeviceswithlaboratoryanalyser
AT wanmohamudwannazaimoon haemoglobina1ccomparingperformanceoftwopointofcaredeviceswithlaboratoryanalyser