Cargando…
Haemoglobin A1c: comparing performance of two point of care devices with laboratory analyser
BACKGROUND: Measurement of HbA1c has been widely used for long-term monitoring and management of diabetes control. There is increasing use of point-of-care (POC) devices for measuring HbA1c where quicker results would allow immediate clinical management decisions to be made. Therefore, it is importa...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3878320/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24344903 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-6-540 |
_version_ | 1782297780750909440 |
---|---|
author | Wan Mohd Zin, Ruziana Mona Ahmad Kamil, Zati Iwani Tuan Soh, Tuan Rosidah Embong, Mustaffa Wan Mohamud, Wan Nazaimoon |
author_facet | Wan Mohd Zin, Ruziana Mona Ahmad Kamil, Zati Iwani Tuan Soh, Tuan Rosidah Embong, Mustaffa Wan Mohamud, Wan Nazaimoon |
author_sort | Wan Mohd Zin, Ruziana Mona |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Measurement of HbA1c has been widely used for long-term monitoring and management of diabetes control. There is increasing use of point-of-care (POC) devices for measuring HbA1c where quicker results would allow immediate clinical management decisions to be made. Therefore, it is important to evaluate and compare the performance of such devices to the reference laboratory method. FINDINGS: A total of 274 venous blood was collected from normal healthy adults during the community screening programmes. The performance of POC devices, Afinion and Quo-test were compared to central laboratory HPLC method; Adams A1c HA 8160. Both POC devices showed good correlation to HA 8160 with r = 0.94 (p < 0.001) and r = 0.95 (p < 0.001) for Afinion and Quo-test respectively. The means difference were statistically higher between POC and HA 8160 with 0.23% (95% CI 0.19-0.26, p < 0.001) and 0.29% (95% CI 0.24-0.34, p < 0.001) for Afinion and Quo-test respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Both POC devices could be considered in health clinics for diabetes management but not to be used for the diagnostic purposes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3878320 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38783202014-01-03 Haemoglobin A1c: comparing performance of two point of care devices with laboratory analyser Wan Mohd Zin, Ruziana Mona Ahmad Kamil, Zati Iwani Tuan Soh, Tuan Rosidah Embong, Mustaffa Wan Mohamud, Wan Nazaimoon BMC Res Notes Short Report BACKGROUND: Measurement of HbA1c has been widely used for long-term monitoring and management of diabetes control. There is increasing use of point-of-care (POC) devices for measuring HbA1c where quicker results would allow immediate clinical management decisions to be made. Therefore, it is important to evaluate and compare the performance of such devices to the reference laboratory method. FINDINGS: A total of 274 venous blood was collected from normal healthy adults during the community screening programmes. The performance of POC devices, Afinion and Quo-test were compared to central laboratory HPLC method; Adams A1c HA 8160. Both POC devices showed good correlation to HA 8160 with r = 0.94 (p < 0.001) and r = 0.95 (p < 0.001) for Afinion and Quo-test respectively. The means difference were statistically higher between POC and HA 8160 with 0.23% (95% CI 0.19-0.26, p < 0.001) and 0.29% (95% CI 0.24-0.34, p < 0.001) for Afinion and Quo-test respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Both POC devices could be considered in health clinics for diabetes management but not to be used for the diagnostic purposes. BioMed Central 2013-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3878320/ /pubmed/24344903 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-6-540 Text en Copyright © 2013 Wan Mohd Zin et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Short Report Wan Mohd Zin, Ruziana Mona Ahmad Kamil, Zati Iwani Tuan Soh, Tuan Rosidah Embong, Mustaffa Wan Mohamud, Wan Nazaimoon Haemoglobin A1c: comparing performance of two point of care devices with laboratory analyser |
title | Haemoglobin A1c: comparing performance of two point of care devices with laboratory analyser |
title_full | Haemoglobin A1c: comparing performance of two point of care devices with laboratory analyser |
title_fullStr | Haemoglobin A1c: comparing performance of two point of care devices with laboratory analyser |
title_full_unstemmed | Haemoglobin A1c: comparing performance of two point of care devices with laboratory analyser |
title_short | Haemoglobin A1c: comparing performance of two point of care devices with laboratory analyser |
title_sort | haemoglobin a1c: comparing performance of two point of care devices with laboratory analyser |
topic | Short Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3878320/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24344903 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-6-540 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wanmohdzinruzianamona haemoglobina1ccomparingperformanceoftwopointofcaredeviceswithlaboratoryanalyser AT ahmadkamilzatiiwani haemoglobina1ccomparingperformanceoftwopointofcaredeviceswithlaboratoryanalyser AT tuansohtuanrosidah haemoglobina1ccomparingperformanceoftwopointofcaredeviceswithlaboratoryanalyser AT embongmustaffa haemoglobina1ccomparingperformanceoftwopointofcaredeviceswithlaboratoryanalyser AT wanmohamudwannazaimoon haemoglobina1ccomparingperformanceoftwopointofcaredeviceswithlaboratoryanalyser |