Cargando…

Design and rationale of the AngioSeal versus the Radial approach In acute coronary SyndromE (ARISE) trial: a randomized comparison of a vascular closure device versus the radial approach to prevent vascular access site complications in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients

BACKGROUND: Arterial access is a major site of bleeding complications after invasive coronary procedures. Among strategies to decrease vascular complications, the radial approach is an established one. Vascular closure devices provide more comfort to patients and decrease hemostasis and need for bed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Andrade, Pedro Beraldo, e Mattos, Luiz Alberto Piva, Tebet, Marden André, Rinaldi, Fábio Salerno, Esteves, Vinícius Cardozo, Nogueira, Ederlon Ferreira, França, João Ítalo Dias, de Andrade, Mônica Vieira Athanazio, Barbosa, Robson Alves, Labrunie, André, Abizaid, Alexandre Antônio Cunha, Sousa, Amanda Guerra de Moraes Rego
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3878328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24345099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-435
_version_ 1782297782631006208
author de Andrade, Pedro Beraldo
e Mattos, Luiz Alberto Piva
Tebet, Marden André
Rinaldi, Fábio Salerno
Esteves, Vinícius Cardozo
Nogueira, Ederlon Ferreira
França, João Ítalo Dias
de Andrade, Mônica Vieira Athanazio
Barbosa, Robson Alves
Labrunie, André
Abizaid, Alexandre Antônio Cunha
Sousa, Amanda Guerra de Moraes Rego
author_facet de Andrade, Pedro Beraldo
e Mattos, Luiz Alberto Piva
Tebet, Marden André
Rinaldi, Fábio Salerno
Esteves, Vinícius Cardozo
Nogueira, Ederlon Ferreira
França, João Ítalo Dias
de Andrade, Mônica Vieira Athanazio
Barbosa, Robson Alves
Labrunie, André
Abizaid, Alexandre Antônio Cunha
Sousa, Amanda Guerra de Moraes Rego
author_sort de Andrade, Pedro Beraldo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Arterial access is a major site of bleeding complications after invasive coronary procedures. Among strategies to decrease vascular complications, the radial approach is an established one. Vascular closure devices provide more comfort to patients and decrease hemostasis and need for bed rest. However, the inconsistency of data proving their safety limits their routine adoption as a strategy to prevent vascular complications, requiring evidence through adequately designed randomized trials. The aim of this study is to compare the radial versus femoral approach using a vascular closure device for the incidence of arterial puncture site vascular complications among non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients submitted to an early invasive strategy. METHODS: ARISE is a national, multicenter, non-inferiority randomized clinical trial. Two hundred patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome will be randomized to either radial or femoral access using a vascular closure device. The primary outcome is the occurrence of vascular complications at an arterial puncture site 30 days after the procedure, including major bleeding, retroperitoneal hematoma, compartment syndrome, hematoma ≥ 5 cm, pseudoaneurysm, arterio-venous fistula, infection, limb ischemia, arterial occlusion, adjacent nerve injury or the need for vascular surgical repair. RESULTS: Enrollment was initiated in September 2012, and until October 2013 91 patients were included. The inclusion phase is expected to last until the second half of 2014. CONCLUSIONS: The ARISE trial will help define the role of a vascular closure device as a bleeding avoidance strategy in patients with NSTEACS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01653587
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3878328
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38783282014-01-03 Design and rationale of the AngioSeal versus the Radial approach In acute coronary SyndromE (ARISE) trial: a randomized comparison of a vascular closure device versus the radial approach to prevent vascular access site complications in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients de Andrade, Pedro Beraldo e Mattos, Luiz Alberto Piva Tebet, Marden André Rinaldi, Fábio Salerno Esteves, Vinícius Cardozo Nogueira, Ederlon Ferreira França, João Ítalo Dias de Andrade, Mônica Vieira Athanazio Barbosa, Robson Alves Labrunie, André Abizaid, Alexandre Antônio Cunha Sousa, Amanda Guerra de Moraes Rego Trials Methodology BACKGROUND: Arterial access is a major site of bleeding complications after invasive coronary procedures. Among strategies to decrease vascular complications, the radial approach is an established one. Vascular closure devices provide more comfort to patients and decrease hemostasis and need for bed rest. However, the inconsistency of data proving their safety limits their routine adoption as a strategy to prevent vascular complications, requiring evidence through adequately designed randomized trials. The aim of this study is to compare the radial versus femoral approach using a vascular closure device for the incidence of arterial puncture site vascular complications among non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients submitted to an early invasive strategy. METHODS: ARISE is a national, multicenter, non-inferiority randomized clinical trial. Two hundred patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome will be randomized to either radial or femoral access using a vascular closure device. The primary outcome is the occurrence of vascular complications at an arterial puncture site 30 days after the procedure, including major bleeding, retroperitoneal hematoma, compartment syndrome, hematoma ≥ 5 cm, pseudoaneurysm, arterio-venous fistula, infection, limb ischemia, arterial occlusion, adjacent nerve injury or the need for vascular surgical repair. RESULTS: Enrollment was initiated in September 2012, and until October 2013 91 patients were included. The inclusion phase is expected to last until the second half of 2014. CONCLUSIONS: The ARISE trial will help define the role of a vascular closure device as a bleeding avoidance strategy in patients with NSTEACS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01653587 BioMed Central 2013-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3878328/ /pubmed/24345099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-435 Text en Copyright © 2013 de Andrade et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methodology
de Andrade, Pedro Beraldo
e Mattos, Luiz Alberto Piva
Tebet, Marden André
Rinaldi, Fábio Salerno
Esteves, Vinícius Cardozo
Nogueira, Ederlon Ferreira
França, João Ítalo Dias
de Andrade, Mônica Vieira Athanazio
Barbosa, Robson Alves
Labrunie, André
Abizaid, Alexandre Antônio Cunha
Sousa, Amanda Guerra de Moraes Rego
Design and rationale of the AngioSeal versus the Radial approach In acute coronary SyndromE (ARISE) trial: a randomized comparison of a vascular closure device versus the radial approach to prevent vascular access site complications in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients
title Design and rationale of the AngioSeal versus the Radial approach In acute coronary SyndromE (ARISE) trial: a randomized comparison of a vascular closure device versus the radial approach to prevent vascular access site complications in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients
title_full Design and rationale of the AngioSeal versus the Radial approach In acute coronary SyndromE (ARISE) trial: a randomized comparison of a vascular closure device versus the radial approach to prevent vascular access site complications in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients
title_fullStr Design and rationale of the AngioSeal versus the Radial approach In acute coronary SyndromE (ARISE) trial: a randomized comparison of a vascular closure device versus the radial approach to prevent vascular access site complications in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients
title_full_unstemmed Design and rationale of the AngioSeal versus the Radial approach In acute coronary SyndromE (ARISE) trial: a randomized comparison of a vascular closure device versus the radial approach to prevent vascular access site complications in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients
title_short Design and rationale of the AngioSeal versus the Radial approach In acute coronary SyndromE (ARISE) trial: a randomized comparison of a vascular closure device versus the radial approach to prevent vascular access site complications in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients
title_sort design and rationale of the angioseal versus the radial approach in acute coronary syndrome (arise) trial: a randomized comparison of a vascular closure device versus the radial approach to prevent vascular access site complications in non-st-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3878328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24345099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-435
work_keys_str_mv AT deandradepedroberaldo designandrationaleoftheangiosealversustheradialapproachinacutecoronarysyndromearisetrialarandomizedcomparisonofavascularclosuredeviceversustheradialapproachtopreventvascularaccesssitecomplicationsinnonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndromepatients
AT emattosluizalbertopiva designandrationaleoftheangiosealversustheradialapproachinacutecoronarysyndromearisetrialarandomizedcomparisonofavascularclosuredeviceversustheradialapproachtopreventvascularaccesssitecomplicationsinnonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndromepatients
AT tebetmardenandre designandrationaleoftheangiosealversustheradialapproachinacutecoronarysyndromearisetrialarandomizedcomparisonofavascularclosuredeviceversustheradialapproachtopreventvascularaccesssitecomplicationsinnonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndromepatients
AT rinaldifabiosalerno designandrationaleoftheangiosealversustheradialapproachinacutecoronarysyndromearisetrialarandomizedcomparisonofavascularclosuredeviceversustheradialapproachtopreventvascularaccesssitecomplicationsinnonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndromepatients
AT estevesviniciuscardozo designandrationaleoftheangiosealversustheradialapproachinacutecoronarysyndromearisetrialarandomizedcomparisonofavascularclosuredeviceversustheradialapproachtopreventvascularaccesssitecomplicationsinnonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndromepatients
AT nogueiraederlonferreira designandrationaleoftheangiosealversustheradialapproachinacutecoronarysyndromearisetrialarandomizedcomparisonofavascularclosuredeviceversustheradialapproachtopreventvascularaccesssitecomplicationsinnonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndromepatients
AT francajoaoitalodias designandrationaleoftheangiosealversustheradialapproachinacutecoronarysyndromearisetrialarandomizedcomparisonofavascularclosuredeviceversustheradialapproachtopreventvascularaccesssitecomplicationsinnonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndromepatients
AT deandrademonicavieiraathanazio designandrationaleoftheangiosealversustheradialapproachinacutecoronarysyndromearisetrialarandomizedcomparisonofavascularclosuredeviceversustheradialapproachtopreventvascularaccesssitecomplicationsinnonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndromepatients
AT barbosarobsonalves designandrationaleoftheangiosealversustheradialapproachinacutecoronarysyndromearisetrialarandomizedcomparisonofavascularclosuredeviceversustheradialapproachtopreventvascularaccesssitecomplicationsinnonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndromepatients
AT labrunieandre designandrationaleoftheangiosealversustheradialapproachinacutecoronarysyndromearisetrialarandomizedcomparisonofavascularclosuredeviceversustheradialapproachtopreventvascularaccesssitecomplicationsinnonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndromepatients
AT abizaidalexandreantoniocunha designandrationaleoftheangiosealversustheradialapproachinacutecoronarysyndromearisetrialarandomizedcomparisonofavascularclosuredeviceversustheradialapproachtopreventvascularaccesssitecomplicationsinnonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndromepatients
AT sousaamandaguerrademoraesrego designandrationaleoftheangiosealversustheradialapproachinacutecoronarysyndromearisetrialarandomizedcomparisonofavascularclosuredeviceversustheradialapproachtopreventvascularaccesssitecomplicationsinnonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndromepatients