Cargando…

Pregnancy planning, smoking behaviour during pregnancy, and neonatal outcome: UK millennium cohort study

BACKGROUND: Pre-pregnancy health and care are important for the health of the future generations. Smoking during pregnancy has been well-researched and there is clear evidence of harm. But there has been little research on the health impact of planning for pregnancy. This study aims to investigate t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Flower, Anika, Shawe, Jill, Stephenson, Judith, Doyle, Pat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3878353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24354748
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-238
_version_ 1782297788745252864
author Flower, Anika
Shawe, Jill
Stephenson, Judith
Doyle, Pat
author_facet Flower, Anika
Shawe, Jill
Stephenson, Judith
Doyle, Pat
author_sort Flower, Anika
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pre-pregnancy health and care are important for the health of the future generations. Smoking during pregnancy has been well-researched and there is clear evidence of harm. But there has been little research on the health impact of planning for pregnancy. This study aims to investigate the independent effects of pregnancy planning and smoking during pregnancy on neonatal outcome. METHODS: This analysis made use of data from the UK Millennium Cohort Study. The study sample consisted of 18,178 singleton babies born in UK between 2000 and 2001. The neonatal outcomes of interest were low birthweight (<2.5 Kg) and pre-term birth (<37 completed weeks gestation). Logistic regression was used to estimate the association between pregnancy planning and/or smoking and neonatal outcome. Adjusted odds ratios were used to calculate population attributable risk fractions (PAFs). RESULTS: 43% of mothers did not plan their pregnancy and 34% were smoking just before and/or during pregnancy. Planners were half as likely to be smokers just before pregnancy, and more likely to give up or reduce the amount smoked if smokers. Unplanned pregnancies had 24% increased odds of low birth weight and prematurity compared to planned pregnancies (AOR(LBW)1.24, 95% CI 1.04-1.48; AOR(PREM)1.24, 95% CI 1.05-1.45), independent of smoking status. The odds of low birth weight for babies of mothers who were smoking just before pregnancy was 91% higher than that of mothers who were not (AOR(LBW)1.91, 95% CI 1.56-2.34). Women who quit or reduced the amount smoked during pregnancy lowered the risk of a low birth weight baby by one third (AOR(LBW)0.66, 95% CI 0.51-0.85) compared with women whose smoking level did not change. Smaller effects were found for prematurity. If all women planned their pregnancy and did not smoke before or during pregnancy, 30% of low birthweight and 14% of prematurity could, in theory, be avoided. CONCLUSIONS: Planning a pregnancy and avoiding smoking during pregnancy has clear, independent, health benefits for babies. Quitting or reducing the amount smoked during pregnancy can reduce the risk of low birthweight.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3878353
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38783532014-01-07 Pregnancy planning, smoking behaviour during pregnancy, and neonatal outcome: UK millennium cohort study Flower, Anika Shawe, Jill Stephenson, Judith Doyle, Pat BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Pre-pregnancy health and care are important for the health of the future generations. Smoking during pregnancy has been well-researched and there is clear evidence of harm. But there has been little research on the health impact of planning for pregnancy. This study aims to investigate the independent effects of pregnancy planning and smoking during pregnancy on neonatal outcome. METHODS: This analysis made use of data from the UK Millennium Cohort Study. The study sample consisted of 18,178 singleton babies born in UK between 2000 and 2001. The neonatal outcomes of interest were low birthweight (<2.5 Kg) and pre-term birth (<37 completed weeks gestation). Logistic regression was used to estimate the association between pregnancy planning and/or smoking and neonatal outcome. Adjusted odds ratios were used to calculate population attributable risk fractions (PAFs). RESULTS: 43% of mothers did not plan their pregnancy and 34% were smoking just before and/or during pregnancy. Planners were half as likely to be smokers just before pregnancy, and more likely to give up or reduce the amount smoked if smokers. Unplanned pregnancies had 24% increased odds of low birth weight and prematurity compared to planned pregnancies (AOR(LBW)1.24, 95% CI 1.04-1.48; AOR(PREM)1.24, 95% CI 1.05-1.45), independent of smoking status. The odds of low birth weight for babies of mothers who were smoking just before pregnancy was 91% higher than that of mothers who were not (AOR(LBW)1.91, 95% CI 1.56-2.34). Women who quit or reduced the amount smoked during pregnancy lowered the risk of a low birth weight baby by one third (AOR(LBW)0.66, 95% CI 0.51-0.85) compared with women whose smoking level did not change. Smaller effects were found for prematurity. If all women planned their pregnancy and did not smoke before or during pregnancy, 30% of low birthweight and 14% of prematurity could, in theory, be avoided. CONCLUSIONS: Planning a pregnancy and avoiding smoking during pregnancy has clear, independent, health benefits for babies. Quitting or reducing the amount smoked during pregnancy can reduce the risk of low birthweight. BioMed Central 2013-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3878353/ /pubmed/24354748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-238 Text en Copyright © 2013 Flower et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Flower, Anika
Shawe, Jill
Stephenson, Judith
Doyle, Pat
Pregnancy planning, smoking behaviour during pregnancy, and neonatal outcome: UK millennium cohort study
title Pregnancy planning, smoking behaviour during pregnancy, and neonatal outcome: UK millennium cohort study
title_full Pregnancy planning, smoking behaviour during pregnancy, and neonatal outcome: UK millennium cohort study
title_fullStr Pregnancy planning, smoking behaviour during pregnancy, and neonatal outcome: UK millennium cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Pregnancy planning, smoking behaviour during pregnancy, and neonatal outcome: UK millennium cohort study
title_short Pregnancy planning, smoking behaviour during pregnancy, and neonatal outcome: UK millennium cohort study
title_sort pregnancy planning, smoking behaviour during pregnancy, and neonatal outcome: uk millennium cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3878353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24354748
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-238
work_keys_str_mv AT floweranika pregnancyplanningsmokingbehaviourduringpregnancyandneonataloutcomeukmillenniumcohortstudy
AT shawejill pregnancyplanningsmokingbehaviourduringpregnancyandneonataloutcomeukmillenniumcohortstudy
AT stephensonjudith pregnancyplanningsmokingbehaviourduringpregnancyandneonataloutcomeukmillenniumcohortstudy
AT doylepat pregnancyplanningsmokingbehaviourduringpregnancyandneonataloutcomeukmillenniumcohortstudy