Cargando…

The effect of social deprivation on clinical outcomes and the use of treatments in the UK cystic fibrosis population: a longitudinal study

BACKGROUND: Poorer socioeconomic circumstances have been linked with worse outcomes in cystic fibrosis. We assessed whether a relation exists between social deprivation and individual's clinical and health-care outcomes. METHODS: We did a longitudinal registry study of the UK cystic fibrosis po...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Taylor-Robinson, David C, Smyth, Rosalind L, Diggle, Peter J, Whitehead, Margaret
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3878382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24429092
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(13)70002-X
_version_ 1782297795584065536
author Taylor-Robinson, David C
Smyth, Rosalind L
Diggle, Peter J
Whitehead, Margaret
author_facet Taylor-Robinson, David C
Smyth, Rosalind L
Diggle, Peter J
Whitehead, Margaret
author_sort Taylor-Robinson, David C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Poorer socioeconomic circumstances have been linked with worse outcomes in cystic fibrosis. We assessed whether a relation exists between social deprivation and individual's clinical and health-care outcomes. METHODS: We did a longitudinal registry study of the UK cystic fibrosis population younger than 40 years (8055 people with 49 337 observations for weight, the most commonly collected outcome, between Jan 1, 1996, and Dec 31, 2009). We assessed data for weight, height, body-mass index, percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (%FEV(1)), risk of Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonisation, and the use of major cystic fibrosis treatment modalities. We used mixed effects models to assess the association between small-area deprivation and clinical and health-care outcomes, adjusting for clinically important covariates. We give continuous outcomes as mean differences, and binary outcomes as odds ratios, comparing extremes of deprivation quintile. FINDINGS: Compared with the least deprived areas, children from the most deprived areas weighed less (standard deviation [SD] score −0·28, 95% CI −0·38 to −0·18), were shorter (–0·31, −0·40 to −0·21, and had a lower body-mass index (–0·13, −0·22 to −0·04), were more likely to have chronic P aeruginosa infection (odds ratio 1·89, 95% CI 1·34 to 2·66), and have a lower %FEV(1) (–4·12 percentage points, 95% CI −5·01 to −3·19). These inequalities were apparent very early in life and did not widen thereafter. On a population level, after adjustment for disease severity, children in the most deprived quintile were more likely to receive intravenous antibiotics (odds ratio 2·52, 95% CI 1·92 to 3·17) and nutritional treatments (1·78, 1·44 to 2·20) compared with individuals in the least deprived quintile. Patients from the most disadvantaged areas were less likely to receive DNase or inhaled antibiotic treatment. INTERPRETATION: In the UK, children with cystic fibrosis from more disadvantaged areas have worse growth and lung function compared with children from more affluent areas, but these inequalities do not widen with advancing age. Clinicians consider deprivation status, as well as disease status, when making decisions about treatments, and this might mitigate some effects of social disadvantage. FUNDING: Medical Research Council (UK).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3878382
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38783822014-01-02 The effect of social deprivation on clinical outcomes and the use of treatments in the UK cystic fibrosis population: a longitudinal study Taylor-Robinson, David C Smyth, Rosalind L Diggle, Peter J Whitehead, Margaret Lancet Respir Med Articles BACKGROUND: Poorer socioeconomic circumstances have been linked with worse outcomes in cystic fibrosis. We assessed whether a relation exists between social deprivation and individual's clinical and health-care outcomes. METHODS: We did a longitudinal registry study of the UK cystic fibrosis population younger than 40 years (8055 people with 49 337 observations for weight, the most commonly collected outcome, between Jan 1, 1996, and Dec 31, 2009). We assessed data for weight, height, body-mass index, percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (%FEV(1)), risk of Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonisation, and the use of major cystic fibrosis treatment modalities. We used mixed effects models to assess the association between small-area deprivation and clinical and health-care outcomes, adjusting for clinically important covariates. We give continuous outcomes as mean differences, and binary outcomes as odds ratios, comparing extremes of deprivation quintile. FINDINGS: Compared with the least deprived areas, children from the most deprived areas weighed less (standard deviation [SD] score −0·28, 95% CI −0·38 to −0·18), were shorter (–0·31, −0·40 to −0·21, and had a lower body-mass index (–0·13, −0·22 to −0·04), were more likely to have chronic P aeruginosa infection (odds ratio 1·89, 95% CI 1·34 to 2·66), and have a lower %FEV(1) (–4·12 percentage points, 95% CI −5·01 to −3·19). These inequalities were apparent very early in life and did not widen thereafter. On a population level, after adjustment for disease severity, children in the most deprived quintile were more likely to receive intravenous antibiotics (odds ratio 2·52, 95% CI 1·92 to 3·17) and nutritional treatments (1·78, 1·44 to 2·20) compared with individuals in the least deprived quintile. Patients from the most disadvantaged areas were less likely to receive DNase or inhaled antibiotic treatment. INTERPRETATION: In the UK, children with cystic fibrosis from more disadvantaged areas have worse growth and lung function compared with children from more affluent areas, but these inequalities do not widen with advancing age. Clinicians consider deprivation status, as well as disease status, when making decisions about treatments, and this might mitigate some effects of social disadvantage. FUNDING: Medical Research Council (UK). Elsevier 2013-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3878382/ /pubmed/24429092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(13)70002-X Text en © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use.
spellingShingle Articles
Taylor-Robinson, David C
Smyth, Rosalind L
Diggle, Peter J
Whitehead, Margaret
The effect of social deprivation on clinical outcomes and the use of treatments in the UK cystic fibrosis population: a longitudinal study
title The effect of social deprivation on clinical outcomes and the use of treatments in the UK cystic fibrosis population: a longitudinal study
title_full The effect of social deprivation on clinical outcomes and the use of treatments in the UK cystic fibrosis population: a longitudinal study
title_fullStr The effect of social deprivation on clinical outcomes and the use of treatments in the UK cystic fibrosis population: a longitudinal study
title_full_unstemmed The effect of social deprivation on clinical outcomes and the use of treatments in the UK cystic fibrosis population: a longitudinal study
title_short The effect of social deprivation on clinical outcomes and the use of treatments in the UK cystic fibrosis population: a longitudinal study
title_sort effect of social deprivation on clinical outcomes and the use of treatments in the uk cystic fibrosis population: a longitudinal study
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3878382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24429092
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(13)70002-X
work_keys_str_mv AT taylorrobinsondavidc theeffectofsocialdeprivationonclinicaloutcomesandtheuseoftreatmentsintheukcysticfibrosispopulationalongitudinalstudy
AT smythrosalindl theeffectofsocialdeprivationonclinicaloutcomesandtheuseoftreatmentsintheukcysticfibrosispopulationalongitudinalstudy
AT digglepeterj theeffectofsocialdeprivationonclinicaloutcomesandtheuseoftreatmentsintheukcysticfibrosispopulationalongitudinalstudy
AT whiteheadmargaret theeffectofsocialdeprivationonclinicaloutcomesandtheuseoftreatmentsintheukcysticfibrosispopulationalongitudinalstudy
AT taylorrobinsondavidc effectofsocialdeprivationonclinicaloutcomesandtheuseoftreatmentsintheukcysticfibrosispopulationalongitudinalstudy
AT smythrosalindl effectofsocialdeprivationonclinicaloutcomesandtheuseoftreatmentsintheukcysticfibrosispopulationalongitudinalstudy
AT digglepeterj effectofsocialdeprivationonclinicaloutcomesandtheuseoftreatmentsintheukcysticfibrosispopulationalongitudinalstudy
AT whiteheadmargaret effectofsocialdeprivationonclinicaloutcomesandtheuseoftreatmentsintheukcysticfibrosispopulationalongitudinalstudy