Cargando…
A case study of binary outcome data extraction across three systematic reviews of hip arthroplasty: errors and differences of selection
BACKGROUND: Data extraction is a key stage in systematic review, yet it is the subject of little research. The aim of the present research was to use a small case study to highlight some important issues affecting this fundamental process. METHODS: The authors undertook an analysis of differences in...
Autores principales: | Carroll, Christopher, Scope, Alison, Kaltenthaler, Eva |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3878552/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24344873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-6-539 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Issues Related to the Frequency of Exploratory Analyses by Evidence Review Groups in the NICE Single Technology Appraisal Process
por: Kaltenthaler, Eva, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Is group cognitive behaviour therapy for postnatal depression evidence-based practice? A systematic review
por: Scope, Alison, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Nature and reporting characteristics of UK health technology assessment systematic reviews
por: Carroll, Christopher, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Variable selection for binary classification using error rate p-values applied to metabolomics data
por: van Reenen, Mari, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Disagreement in Readmission Rates After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Across Data Sets
por: Zhao, Stephanie, et al.
Publicado: (2021)