Cargando…

The individual and societal burden of chronic pain in Europe: the case for strategic prioritisation and action to improve knowledge and availability of appropriate care

BACKGROUND: Chronic pain is common in Europe and elsewhere and its under treatment confers a substantial burden on individuals, employers, healthcare systems and society in general. Indeed, the personal and socioeconomic impact of chronic pain is as great as, or greater, than that of other establish...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Breivik, Harald, Eisenberg, Elon, O’Brien, Tony
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3878786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24365383
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-1229
_version_ 1782297866910302208
author Breivik, Harald
Eisenberg, Elon
O’Brien, Tony
author_facet Breivik, Harald
Eisenberg, Elon
O’Brien, Tony
author_sort Breivik, Harald
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chronic pain is common in Europe and elsewhere and its under treatment confers a substantial burden on individuals, employers, healthcare systems and society in general. Indeed, the personal and socioeconomic impact of chronic pain is as great as, or greater, than that of other established healthcare priorities. In light of review of recently published data confirming its clinical and socioeconomic impact, this paper argues that chronic pain should be ranked alongside other conditions of established priority in Europe. We outline strategies to help overcome barriers to effective pain care resulting in particular from deficiencies in education and access to interdisciplinary pain management services. We also address the confusion that exists between proper clinical and scientific uses of opioid medications and their potential for misuse and diversion, as reflected in international variations in the access to, and availability of, these agents. DISCUSSION: As the economic costs are driven in part by the costs of lost productivity, absenteeism and early retirement, pain management should aim to fully rehabilitate patients, rather than merely to relieve pain. Accredited education of physicians and allied health professionals regarding state-of-the-art pain management is crucial. Some progress has been made in this area, but further provision and incentivization is required. We support a tiered approach to pain management, whereby patients with pain uncontrolled by non-specialists are able to consult a physician with a pain competency or a specialist in pain medicine, who in turn can recruit the services of other professionals on a case-by-case basis. A fully integrated interdisciplinary pain service should ideally be available to patients with refractory pain. Governments and healthcare systems should ensure that their policies on controlled medications are balanced, safeguarding public health without undue restrictions that compromise patient care, and that physician education programmes support these aims. SUMMARY: Strategic prioritization and co-ordinated actions are required nationally and internationally to address the unacceptable and unnecessary burden of uncontrolled chronic pain that plagues European communities and economies. An appreciation of the ‘return on investment’ in pain management services will require policymakers to adopt a long-term, cross-budgetary approach.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3878786
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38787862014-01-03 The individual and societal burden of chronic pain in Europe: the case for strategic prioritisation and action to improve knowledge and availability of appropriate care Breivik, Harald Eisenberg, Elon O’Brien, Tony BMC Public Health Debate BACKGROUND: Chronic pain is common in Europe and elsewhere and its under treatment confers a substantial burden on individuals, employers, healthcare systems and society in general. Indeed, the personal and socioeconomic impact of chronic pain is as great as, or greater, than that of other established healthcare priorities. In light of review of recently published data confirming its clinical and socioeconomic impact, this paper argues that chronic pain should be ranked alongside other conditions of established priority in Europe. We outline strategies to help overcome barriers to effective pain care resulting in particular from deficiencies in education and access to interdisciplinary pain management services. We also address the confusion that exists between proper clinical and scientific uses of opioid medications and their potential for misuse and diversion, as reflected in international variations in the access to, and availability of, these agents. DISCUSSION: As the economic costs are driven in part by the costs of lost productivity, absenteeism and early retirement, pain management should aim to fully rehabilitate patients, rather than merely to relieve pain. Accredited education of physicians and allied health professionals regarding state-of-the-art pain management is crucial. Some progress has been made in this area, but further provision and incentivization is required. We support a tiered approach to pain management, whereby patients with pain uncontrolled by non-specialists are able to consult a physician with a pain competency or a specialist in pain medicine, who in turn can recruit the services of other professionals on a case-by-case basis. A fully integrated interdisciplinary pain service should ideally be available to patients with refractory pain. Governments and healthcare systems should ensure that their policies on controlled medications are balanced, safeguarding public health without undue restrictions that compromise patient care, and that physician education programmes support these aims. SUMMARY: Strategic prioritization and co-ordinated actions are required nationally and internationally to address the unacceptable and unnecessary burden of uncontrolled chronic pain that plagues European communities and economies. An appreciation of the ‘return on investment’ in pain management services will require policymakers to adopt a long-term, cross-budgetary approach. BioMed Central 2013-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3878786/ /pubmed/24365383 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-1229 Text en Copyright © 2013 Breivik et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Debate
Breivik, Harald
Eisenberg, Elon
O’Brien, Tony
The individual and societal burden of chronic pain in Europe: the case for strategic prioritisation and action to improve knowledge and availability of appropriate care
title The individual and societal burden of chronic pain in Europe: the case for strategic prioritisation and action to improve knowledge and availability of appropriate care
title_full The individual and societal burden of chronic pain in Europe: the case for strategic prioritisation and action to improve knowledge and availability of appropriate care
title_fullStr The individual and societal burden of chronic pain in Europe: the case for strategic prioritisation and action to improve knowledge and availability of appropriate care
title_full_unstemmed The individual and societal burden of chronic pain in Europe: the case for strategic prioritisation and action to improve knowledge and availability of appropriate care
title_short The individual and societal burden of chronic pain in Europe: the case for strategic prioritisation and action to improve knowledge and availability of appropriate care
title_sort individual and societal burden of chronic pain in europe: the case for strategic prioritisation and action to improve knowledge and availability of appropriate care
topic Debate
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3878786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24365383
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-1229
work_keys_str_mv AT breivikharald theindividualandsocietalburdenofchronicpainineuropethecaseforstrategicprioritisationandactiontoimproveknowledgeandavailabilityofappropriatecare
AT eisenbergelon theindividualandsocietalburdenofchronicpainineuropethecaseforstrategicprioritisationandactiontoimproveknowledgeandavailabilityofappropriatecare
AT obrientony theindividualandsocietalburdenofchronicpainineuropethecaseforstrategicprioritisationandactiontoimproveknowledgeandavailabilityofappropriatecare
AT breivikharald individualandsocietalburdenofchronicpainineuropethecaseforstrategicprioritisationandactiontoimproveknowledgeandavailabilityofappropriatecare
AT eisenbergelon individualandsocietalburdenofchronicpainineuropethecaseforstrategicprioritisationandactiontoimproveknowledgeandavailabilityofappropriatecare
AT obrientony individualandsocietalburdenofchronicpainineuropethecaseforstrategicprioritisationandactiontoimproveknowledgeandavailabilityofappropriatecare