Cargando…

Localization of higher grade tumor foci in potential candidates for active surveillance who opt for radical prostatectomy

PURPOSE: To investigate actual intraprostatic location of higher graded tumor foci undetected via standard transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy amongst patients who would be clinically considered appropriate candidates for active surveillance (AS) but underwent radical prostatectomy (RP). M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hong, Sung Kyu, Eastham, James A., Fine, Samson W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Asian Pacific Prostate Society (APPS) 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3879052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24392439
http://dx.doi.org/10.12954/PI.13029
_version_ 1782297910631727104
author Hong, Sung Kyu
Eastham, James A.
Fine, Samson W.
author_facet Hong, Sung Kyu
Eastham, James A.
Fine, Samson W.
author_sort Hong, Sung Kyu
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To investigate actual intraprostatic location of higher graded tumor foci undetected via standard transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy amongst patients who would be clinically considered appropriate candidates for active surveillance (AS) but underwent radical prostatectomy (RP). METHODS: We reviewed entirely-submitted and whole-mounted RP specimens from 169 men who were deemed appropriate for AS clinically, but opted for RP and were found to have higher grade tumors. For each case, tumor nodules were circled and color-coded in a grade-specific manner and digitally scanned to created tumor maps. The locations of tumor foci with Gleason grade ≥4 were stratified by specific sites: anterior, anterolateral, lateral only (not clearly anterior or posterior), posterior, and posterolateral area. RESULTS: Of 169 patients, 86% had clinical stage T1c and 14% T2a. RP Gleason score 7 in all but two men. Higher-grade tumor foci were localized to: anterior (n=66, 39%), anterolateral (n=4, 2%), lateral only (not clearly anterior or posterior) (n=5, 3%), posterior (n=52, 31%), and posterolateral (n=42, 25%) prostate, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients deemed clinically appropriate for AS, higher-grade tumor foci missed by standard prostate biopsies were localized to both the anterior and posterior prostate, without predominance of a particular area. These findings lend additional support to performing repeat standard prostate biopsy in potential candidates for AS and should be considered in efforts to optimize current biopsy strategies for the selection of AS patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3879052
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Asian Pacific Prostate Society (APPS)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38790522014-01-03 Localization of higher grade tumor foci in potential candidates for active surveillance who opt for radical prostatectomy Hong, Sung Kyu Eastham, James A. Fine, Samson W. Prostate Int Original Articles PURPOSE: To investigate actual intraprostatic location of higher graded tumor foci undetected via standard transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy amongst patients who would be clinically considered appropriate candidates for active surveillance (AS) but underwent radical prostatectomy (RP). METHODS: We reviewed entirely-submitted and whole-mounted RP specimens from 169 men who were deemed appropriate for AS clinically, but opted for RP and were found to have higher grade tumors. For each case, tumor nodules were circled and color-coded in a grade-specific manner and digitally scanned to created tumor maps. The locations of tumor foci with Gleason grade ≥4 were stratified by specific sites: anterior, anterolateral, lateral only (not clearly anterior or posterior), posterior, and posterolateral area. RESULTS: Of 169 patients, 86% had clinical stage T1c and 14% T2a. RP Gleason score 7 in all but two men. Higher-grade tumor foci were localized to: anterior (n=66, 39%), anterolateral (n=4, 2%), lateral only (not clearly anterior or posterior) (n=5, 3%), posterior (n=52, 31%), and posterolateral (n=42, 25%) prostate, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients deemed clinically appropriate for AS, higher-grade tumor foci missed by standard prostate biopsies were localized to both the anterior and posterior prostate, without predominance of a particular area. These findings lend additional support to performing repeat standard prostate biopsy in potential candidates for AS and should be considered in efforts to optimize current biopsy strategies for the selection of AS patients. Asian Pacific Prostate Society (APPS) 2013 2013-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3879052/ /pubmed/24392439 http://dx.doi.org/10.12954/PI.13029 Text en Copyright © 2013 Asian Pacific Prostate Society (APPS) This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Hong, Sung Kyu
Eastham, James A.
Fine, Samson W.
Localization of higher grade tumor foci in potential candidates for active surveillance who opt for radical prostatectomy
title Localization of higher grade tumor foci in potential candidates for active surveillance who opt for radical prostatectomy
title_full Localization of higher grade tumor foci in potential candidates for active surveillance who opt for radical prostatectomy
title_fullStr Localization of higher grade tumor foci in potential candidates for active surveillance who opt for radical prostatectomy
title_full_unstemmed Localization of higher grade tumor foci in potential candidates for active surveillance who opt for radical prostatectomy
title_short Localization of higher grade tumor foci in potential candidates for active surveillance who opt for radical prostatectomy
title_sort localization of higher grade tumor foci in potential candidates for active surveillance who opt for radical prostatectomy
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3879052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24392439
http://dx.doi.org/10.12954/PI.13029
work_keys_str_mv AT hongsungkyu localizationofhighergradetumorfociinpotentialcandidatesforactivesurveillancewhooptforradicalprostatectomy
AT easthamjamesa localizationofhighergradetumorfociinpotentialcandidatesforactivesurveillancewhooptforradicalprostatectomy
AT finesamsonw localizationofhighergradetumorfociinpotentialcandidatesforactivesurveillancewhooptforradicalprostatectomy