Cargando…

Neuromuscular Fatigue Is Not Different between Constant and Variable Frequency Stimulation

This study compared fatigue development of the triceps surae induced by two electrical stimulation protocols composed of constant and variable frequency trains (CFTs, VFTs, 450 trains, 30 Hz, 167 ms ON, 500 ms OFF and 146 ms ON, 500 ms OFF respectively). For the VFTs protocol a doublet (100 Hz) was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Papaiordanidou, Maria, Billot, Maxime, Varray, Alain, Martin, Alain
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3879309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24392155
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084740
Descripción
Sumario:This study compared fatigue development of the triceps surae induced by two electrical stimulation protocols composed of constant and variable frequency trains (CFTs, VFTs, 450 trains, 30 Hz, 167 ms ON, 500 ms OFF and 146 ms ON, 500 ms OFF respectively). For the VFTs protocol a doublet (100 Hz) was used at the beginning of each train. The intensity used evoked 30% of a maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) and was defined using CFTs. Neuromuscular tests were performed before and after each protocol. Changes in excitation-contraction coupling were assessed by analysing the M-wave [at rest (M(max)) and during MVC (M(sup))] and associated peak twitch (Pt). H-reflex [at rest (H(max)) and during MVC (H(sup))] and the motor evoked potential (MEP) during MVC were studied to assess spinal and corticospinal excitability of the soleus muscle. MVC decrease was similar between the protocols (−8%, P<0.05). M(max), M(sup) and Pt decreased after both protocols (P<0.01). H(max)/M(max) was decreased (P<0.05), whereas H(sup)/M(sup) and MEP/M(sup) remained unchanged after both protocols. The results indicate that CFTs and VFTs gave rise to equivalent neuromuscular fatigue. This fatigue resulted from alterations taking place at the muscular level. The finding that cortical and spinal excitability remained unchanged during MVC indicates that spinal and/or supraspinal mechanisms were activated to compensate for the loss of spinal excitability at rest.