Cargando…

Cognitive Reserve in Young and Old Healthy Subjects: Differences and Similarities in a Testing-the-Limits Paradigm with DSST

Cognitive reserve (CR) is understood as capacity to cope with challenging conditions, e.g. after brain injury or in states of brain dysfunction, or age-related cognitive decline. CR in elderly subjects has attracted much research interest, but differences between healthy older and younger subjects h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zihl, Josef, Fink, Thomas, Pargent, Florian, Ziegler, Matthias, Bühner, Markus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3880294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24404176
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084590
_version_ 1782298065041883136
author Zihl, Josef
Fink, Thomas
Pargent, Florian
Ziegler, Matthias
Bühner, Markus
author_facet Zihl, Josef
Fink, Thomas
Pargent, Florian
Ziegler, Matthias
Bühner, Markus
author_sort Zihl, Josef
collection PubMed
description Cognitive reserve (CR) is understood as capacity to cope with challenging conditions, e.g. after brain injury or in states of brain dysfunction, or age-related cognitive decline. CR in elderly subjects has attracted much research interest, but differences between healthy older and younger subjects have not been addressed in detail hitherto. Usually, one-time standard individual assessments are used to characterise CR. Here we observe CR as individual improvement in cognitive performance (gain) in a complex testing-the-limits paradigm, the digit symbol substitution test (DSST), with 10 repeated measurements, in 140 younger (20–30 yrs) and 140 older (57–74 yrs) healthy subjects. In addition, we assessed attention, memory and executive function, and mood and personality traits as potential influence factors for CR. We found that both, younger and older subjects showed significant gains, which were significantly correlated with speed of information processing, verbal short-term memory and visual problem solving in the older group only. Gender, personality traits and mood did not significantly influence gains in either group. Surprisingly about half of the older subjects performed at the level of the younger group, suggesting that interindividual differences in CR are possibly age-independent. We propose that these findings may also be understood as indication that one-time standard individual measurements do not allow assessment of CR, and that the use of DSST in a testing-the-limits paradigm is a valuable assessment method for CR in young and elderly subjects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3880294
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38802942014-01-08 Cognitive Reserve in Young and Old Healthy Subjects: Differences and Similarities in a Testing-the-Limits Paradigm with DSST Zihl, Josef Fink, Thomas Pargent, Florian Ziegler, Matthias Bühner, Markus PLoS One Research Article Cognitive reserve (CR) is understood as capacity to cope with challenging conditions, e.g. after brain injury or in states of brain dysfunction, or age-related cognitive decline. CR in elderly subjects has attracted much research interest, but differences between healthy older and younger subjects have not been addressed in detail hitherto. Usually, one-time standard individual assessments are used to characterise CR. Here we observe CR as individual improvement in cognitive performance (gain) in a complex testing-the-limits paradigm, the digit symbol substitution test (DSST), with 10 repeated measurements, in 140 younger (20–30 yrs) and 140 older (57–74 yrs) healthy subjects. In addition, we assessed attention, memory and executive function, and mood and personality traits as potential influence factors for CR. We found that both, younger and older subjects showed significant gains, which were significantly correlated with speed of information processing, verbal short-term memory and visual problem solving in the older group only. Gender, personality traits and mood did not significantly influence gains in either group. Surprisingly about half of the older subjects performed at the level of the younger group, suggesting that interindividual differences in CR are possibly age-independent. We propose that these findings may also be understood as indication that one-time standard individual measurements do not allow assessment of CR, and that the use of DSST in a testing-the-limits paradigm is a valuable assessment method for CR in young and elderly subjects. Public Library of Science 2014-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3880294/ /pubmed/24404176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084590 Text en © 2014 Zihl et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zihl, Josef
Fink, Thomas
Pargent, Florian
Ziegler, Matthias
Bühner, Markus
Cognitive Reserve in Young and Old Healthy Subjects: Differences and Similarities in a Testing-the-Limits Paradigm with DSST
title Cognitive Reserve in Young and Old Healthy Subjects: Differences and Similarities in a Testing-the-Limits Paradigm with DSST
title_full Cognitive Reserve in Young and Old Healthy Subjects: Differences and Similarities in a Testing-the-Limits Paradigm with DSST
title_fullStr Cognitive Reserve in Young and Old Healthy Subjects: Differences and Similarities in a Testing-the-Limits Paradigm with DSST
title_full_unstemmed Cognitive Reserve in Young and Old Healthy Subjects: Differences and Similarities in a Testing-the-Limits Paradigm with DSST
title_short Cognitive Reserve in Young and Old Healthy Subjects: Differences and Similarities in a Testing-the-Limits Paradigm with DSST
title_sort cognitive reserve in young and old healthy subjects: differences and similarities in a testing-the-limits paradigm with dsst
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3880294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24404176
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084590
work_keys_str_mv AT zihljosef cognitivereserveinyoungandoldhealthysubjectsdifferencesandsimilaritiesinatestingthelimitsparadigmwithdsst
AT finkthomas cognitivereserveinyoungandoldhealthysubjectsdifferencesandsimilaritiesinatestingthelimitsparadigmwithdsst
AT pargentflorian cognitivereserveinyoungandoldhealthysubjectsdifferencesandsimilaritiesinatestingthelimitsparadigmwithdsst
AT zieglermatthias cognitivereserveinyoungandoldhealthysubjectsdifferencesandsimilaritiesinatestingthelimitsparadigmwithdsst
AT buhnermarkus cognitivereserveinyoungandoldhealthysubjectsdifferencesandsimilaritiesinatestingthelimitsparadigmwithdsst