Cargando…

The application of an in situ karyotyping technique for mesenchymal stromal cells: a validation and comparison study with classical G-banding

The cytogenetic analysis of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) is essential for verifying the safety and stability of MSCs. An in situ technique, which uses cells grown on coverslips for karyotyping and minimizes cell manipulation, is the standard protocol for the chromosome analysis of amniotic fluid...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hwang, Sang Mee, See, Cha-ja, Choi, Jungeun, Kim, Seon Young, Choi, Qute, Kim, Jung Ah, Kwon, Jiseok, Park, Si Nae, Im, Kyongok, Oh, Il-Hoan, Lee, Dong Soon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3880460/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24357832
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emm.2013.133
_version_ 1782298088216461312
author Hwang, Sang Mee
See, Cha-ja
Choi, Jungeun
Kim, Seon Young
Choi, Qute
Kim, Jung Ah
Kwon, Jiseok
Park, Si Nae
Im, Kyongok
Oh, Il-Hoan
Lee, Dong Soon
author_facet Hwang, Sang Mee
See, Cha-ja
Choi, Jungeun
Kim, Seon Young
Choi, Qute
Kim, Jung Ah
Kwon, Jiseok
Park, Si Nae
Im, Kyongok
Oh, Il-Hoan
Lee, Dong Soon
author_sort Hwang, Sang Mee
collection PubMed
description The cytogenetic analysis of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) is essential for verifying the safety and stability of MSCs. An in situ technique, which uses cells grown on coverslips for karyotyping and minimizes cell manipulation, is the standard protocol for the chromosome analysis of amniotic fluids. Therefore, we applied the in situ karyotyping technique in MSCs and compared the quality of metaphases and karyotyping results with classical G-banding and chromosomal abnormalities with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Human adipose- and umbilical cord-derived MSC cell lines (American Type Culture Collection PCS-500-011, PCS-500-010) were used for evaluation. The quality of metaphases was assessed by analyzing the chromosome numbers in each metaphase, the overlaps of chromosomes and the mean length of chromosome 1. FISH was performed in the interphase nuclei of MSCs for 6q, 7q and 17q abnormalities and for the enumeration of chromosomes via oligo-FISH in adipose-derived MSCs. The number of chromosomes in each metaphase was more variable in classical G-banding. The overlap of chromosomes and the mean length of chromosome 1 as observed via in situ karyotyping were comparable to those of classical G-banding (P=0.218 and 0.674, respectively). Classical G-banding and in situ karyotyping by two personnel showed normal karyotypes for both cell lines in five passages. No numerical or structural chromosomal abnormalities were found by the interphase-FISH. In situ karyotyping showed equivalent karyotype results, and the quality of the metaphases was not inferior to classical G-banding. Thus, in situ karyotyping with minimized cell manipulation and the use of less cells would be useful for karyotyping MSCs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3880460
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38804602014-01-04 The application of an in situ karyotyping technique for mesenchymal stromal cells: a validation and comparison study with classical G-banding Hwang, Sang Mee See, Cha-ja Choi, Jungeun Kim, Seon Young Choi, Qute Kim, Jung Ah Kwon, Jiseok Park, Si Nae Im, Kyongok Oh, Il-Hoan Lee, Dong Soon Exp Mol Med Original Article The cytogenetic analysis of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) is essential for verifying the safety and stability of MSCs. An in situ technique, which uses cells grown on coverslips for karyotyping and minimizes cell manipulation, is the standard protocol for the chromosome analysis of amniotic fluids. Therefore, we applied the in situ karyotyping technique in MSCs and compared the quality of metaphases and karyotyping results with classical G-banding and chromosomal abnormalities with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Human adipose- and umbilical cord-derived MSC cell lines (American Type Culture Collection PCS-500-011, PCS-500-010) were used for evaluation. The quality of metaphases was assessed by analyzing the chromosome numbers in each metaphase, the overlaps of chromosomes and the mean length of chromosome 1. FISH was performed in the interphase nuclei of MSCs for 6q, 7q and 17q abnormalities and for the enumeration of chromosomes via oligo-FISH in adipose-derived MSCs. The number of chromosomes in each metaphase was more variable in classical G-banding. The overlap of chromosomes and the mean length of chromosome 1 as observed via in situ karyotyping were comparable to those of classical G-banding (P=0.218 and 0.674, respectively). Classical G-banding and in situ karyotyping by two personnel showed normal karyotypes for both cell lines in five passages. No numerical or structural chromosomal abnormalities were found by the interphase-FISH. In situ karyotyping showed equivalent karyotype results, and the quality of the metaphases was not inferior to classical G-banding. Thus, in situ karyotyping with minimized cell manipulation and the use of less cells would be useful for karyotyping MSCs. Nature Publishing Group 2013-12 2013-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3880460/ /pubmed/24357832 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emm.2013.133 Text en Copyright © 2013 KSBMB. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Hwang, Sang Mee
See, Cha-ja
Choi, Jungeun
Kim, Seon Young
Choi, Qute
Kim, Jung Ah
Kwon, Jiseok
Park, Si Nae
Im, Kyongok
Oh, Il-Hoan
Lee, Dong Soon
The application of an in situ karyotyping technique for mesenchymal stromal cells: a validation and comparison study with classical G-banding
title The application of an in situ karyotyping technique for mesenchymal stromal cells: a validation and comparison study with classical G-banding
title_full The application of an in situ karyotyping technique for mesenchymal stromal cells: a validation and comparison study with classical G-banding
title_fullStr The application of an in situ karyotyping technique for mesenchymal stromal cells: a validation and comparison study with classical G-banding
title_full_unstemmed The application of an in situ karyotyping technique for mesenchymal stromal cells: a validation and comparison study with classical G-banding
title_short The application of an in situ karyotyping technique for mesenchymal stromal cells: a validation and comparison study with classical G-banding
title_sort application of an in situ karyotyping technique for mesenchymal stromal cells: a validation and comparison study with classical g-banding
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3880460/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24357832
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emm.2013.133
work_keys_str_mv AT hwangsangmee theapplicationofaninsitukaryotypingtechniqueformesenchymalstromalcellsavalidationandcomparisonstudywithclassicalgbanding
AT seechaja theapplicationofaninsitukaryotypingtechniqueformesenchymalstromalcellsavalidationandcomparisonstudywithclassicalgbanding
AT choijungeun theapplicationofaninsitukaryotypingtechniqueformesenchymalstromalcellsavalidationandcomparisonstudywithclassicalgbanding
AT kimseonyoung theapplicationofaninsitukaryotypingtechniqueformesenchymalstromalcellsavalidationandcomparisonstudywithclassicalgbanding
AT choiqute theapplicationofaninsitukaryotypingtechniqueformesenchymalstromalcellsavalidationandcomparisonstudywithclassicalgbanding
AT kimjungah theapplicationofaninsitukaryotypingtechniqueformesenchymalstromalcellsavalidationandcomparisonstudywithclassicalgbanding
AT kwonjiseok theapplicationofaninsitukaryotypingtechniqueformesenchymalstromalcellsavalidationandcomparisonstudywithclassicalgbanding
AT parksinae theapplicationofaninsitukaryotypingtechniqueformesenchymalstromalcellsavalidationandcomparisonstudywithclassicalgbanding
AT imkyongok theapplicationofaninsitukaryotypingtechniqueformesenchymalstromalcellsavalidationandcomparisonstudywithclassicalgbanding
AT ohilhoan theapplicationofaninsitukaryotypingtechniqueformesenchymalstromalcellsavalidationandcomparisonstudywithclassicalgbanding
AT leedongsoon theapplicationofaninsitukaryotypingtechniqueformesenchymalstromalcellsavalidationandcomparisonstudywithclassicalgbanding
AT hwangsangmee applicationofaninsitukaryotypingtechniqueformesenchymalstromalcellsavalidationandcomparisonstudywithclassicalgbanding
AT seechaja applicationofaninsitukaryotypingtechniqueformesenchymalstromalcellsavalidationandcomparisonstudywithclassicalgbanding
AT choijungeun applicationofaninsitukaryotypingtechniqueformesenchymalstromalcellsavalidationandcomparisonstudywithclassicalgbanding
AT kimseonyoung applicationofaninsitukaryotypingtechniqueformesenchymalstromalcellsavalidationandcomparisonstudywithclassicalgbanding
AT choiqute applicationofaninsitukaryotypingtechniqueformesenchymalstromalcellsavalidationandcomparisonstudywithclassicalgbanding
AT kimjungah applicationofaninsitukaryotypingtechniqueformesenchymalstromalcellsavalidationandcomparisonstudywithclassicalgbanding
AT kwonjiseok applicationofaninsitukaryotypingtechniqueformesenchymalstromalcellsavalidationandcomparisonstudywithclassicalgbanding
AT parksinae applicationofaninsitukaryotypingtechniqueformesenchymalstromalcellsavalidationandcomparisonstudywithclassicalgbanding
AT imkyongok applicationofaninsitukaryotypingtechniqueformesenchymalstromalcellsavalidationandcomparisonstudywithclassicalgbanding
AT ohilhoan applicationofaninsitukaryotypingtechniqueformesenchymalstromalcellsavalidationandcomparisonstudywithclassicalgbanding
AT leedongsoon applicationofaninsitukaryotypingtechniqueformesenchymalstromalcellsavalidationandcomparisonstudywithclassicalgbanding