Cargando…
The application of an in situ karyotyping technique for mesenchymal stromal cells: a validation and comparison study with classical G-banding
The cytogenetic analysis of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) is essential for verifying the safety and stability of MSCs. An in situ technique, which uses cells grown on coverslips for karyotyping and minimizes cell manipulation, is the standard protocol for the chromosome analysis of amniotic fluid...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3880460/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24357832 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emm.2013.133 |
_version_ | 1782298088216461312 |
---|---|
author | Hwang, Sang Mee See, Cha-ja Choi, Jungeun Kim, Seon Young Choi, Qute Kim, Jung Ah Kwon, Jiseok Park, Si Nae Im, Kyongok Oh, Il-Hoan Lee, Dong Soon |
author_facet | Hwang, Sang Mee See, Cha-ja Choi, Jungeun Kim, Seon Young Choi, Qute Kim, Jung Ah Kwon, Jiseok Park, Si Nae Im, Kyongok Oh, Il-Hoan Lee, Dong Soon |
author_sort | Hwang, Sang Mee |
collection | PubMed |
description | The cytogenetic analysis of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) is essential for verifying the safety and stability of MSCs. An in situ technique, which uses cells grown on coverslips for karyotyping and minimizes cell manipulation, is the standard protocol for the chromosome analysis of amniotic fluids. Therefore, we applied the in situ karyotyping technique in MSCs and compared the quality of metaphases and karyotyping results with classical G-banding and chromosomal abnormalities with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Human adipose- and umbilical cord-derived MSC cell lines (American Type Culture Collection PCS-500-011, PCS-500-010) were used for evaluation. The quality of metaphases was assessed by analyzing the chromosome numbers in each metaphase, the overlaps of chromosomes and the mean length of chromosome 1. FISH was performed in the interphase nuclei of MSCs for 6q, 7q and 17q abnormalities and for the enumeration of chromosomes via oligo-FISH in adipose-derived MSCs. The number of chromosomes in each metaphase was more variable in classical G-banding. The overlap of chromosomes and the mean length of chromosome 1 as observed via in situ karyotyping were comparable to those of classical G-banding (P=0.218 and 0.674, respectively). Classical G-banding and in situ karyotyping by two personnel showed normal karyotypes for both cell lines in five passages. No numerical or structural chromosomal abnormalities were found by the interphase-FISH. In situ karyotyping showed equivalent karyotype results, and the quality of the metaphases was not inferior to classical G-banding. Thus, in situ karyotyping with minimized cell manipulation and the use of less cells would be useful for karyotyping MSCs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3880460 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38804602014-01-04 The application of an in situ karyotyping technique for mesenchymal stromal cells: a validation and comparison study with classical G-banding Hwang, Sang Mee See, Cha-ja Choi, Jungeun Kim, Seon Young Choi, Qute Kim, Jung Ah Kwon, Jiseok Park, Si Nae Im, Kyongok Oh, Il-Hoan Lee, Dong Soon Exp Mol Med Original Article The cytogenetic analysis of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) is essential for verifying the safety and stability of MSCs. An in situ technique, which uses cells grown on coverslips for karyotyping and minimizes cell manipulation, is the standard protocol for the chromosome analysis of amniotic fluids. Therefore, we applied the in situ karyotyping technique in MSCs and compared the quality of metaphases and karyotyping results with classical G-banding and chromosomal abnormalities with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Human adipose- and umbilical cord-derived MSC cell lines (American Type Culture Collection PCS-500-011, PCS-500-010) were used for evaluation. The quality of metaphases was assessed by analyzing the chromosome numbers in each metaphase, the overlaps of chromosomes and the mean length of chromosome 1. FISH was performed in the interphase nuclei of MSCs for 6q, 7q and 17q abnormalities and for the enumeration of chromosomes via oligo-FISH in adipose-derived MSCs. The number of chromosomes in each metaphase was more variable in classical G-banding. The overlap of chromosomes and the mean length of chromosome 1 as observed via in situ karyotyping were comparable to those of classical G-banding (P=0.218 and 0.674, respectively). Classical G-banding and in situ karyotyping by two personnel showed normal karyotypes for both cell lines in five passages. No numerical or structural chromosomal abnormalities were found by the interphase-FISH. In situ karyotyping showed equivalent karyotype results, and the quality of the metaphases was not inferior to classical G-banding. Thus, in situ karyotyping with minimized cell manipulation and the use of less cells would be useful for karyotyping MSCs. Nature Publishing Group 2013-12 2013-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3880460/ /pubmed/24357832 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emm.2013.133 Text en Copyright © 2013 KSBMB. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Original Article Hwang, Sang Mee See, Cha-ja Choi, Jungeun Kim, Seon Young Choi, Qute Kim, Jung Ah Kwon, Jiseok Park, Si Nae Im, Kyongok Oh, Il-Hoan Lee, Dong Soon The application of an in situ karyotyping technique for mesenchymal stromal cells: a validation and comparison study with classical G-banding |
title | The application of an in situ karyotyping technique for mesenchymal stromal cells: a validation and comparison study with classical G-banding |
title_full | The application of an in situ karyotyping technique for mesenchymal stromal cells: a validation and comparison study with classical G-banding |
title_fullStr | The application of an in situ karyotyping technique for mesenchymal stromal cells: a validation and comparison study with classical G-banding |
title_full_unstemmed | The application of an in situ karyotyping technique for mesenchymal stromal cells: a validation and comparison study with classical G-banding |
title_short | The application of an in situ karyotyping technique for mesenchymal stromal cells: a validation and comparison study with classical G-banding |
title_sort | application of an in situ karyotyping technique for mesenchymal stromal cells: a validation and comparison study with classical g-banding |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3880460/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24357832 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emm.2013.133 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hwangsangmee theapplicationofaninsitukaryotypingtechniqueformesenchymalstromalcellsavalidationandcomparisonstudywithclassicalgbanding AT seechaja theapplicationofaninsitukaryotypingtechniqueformesenchymalstromalcellsavalidationandcomparisonstudywithclassicalgbanding AT choijungeun theapplicationofaninsitukaryotypingtechniqueformesenchymalstromalcellsavalidationandcomparisonstudywithclassicalgbanding AT kimseonyoung theapplicationofaninsitukaryotypingtechniqueformesenchymalstromalcellsavalidationandcomparisonstudywithclassicalgbanding AT choiqute theapplicationofaninsitukaryotypingtechniqueformesenchymalstromalcellsavalidationandcomparisonstudywithclassicalgbanding AT kimjungah theapplicationofaninsitukaryotypingtechniqueformesenchymalstromalcellsavalidationandcomparisonstudywithclassicalgbanding AT kwonjiseok theapplicationofaninsitukaryotypingtechniqueformesenchymalstromalcellsavalidationandcomparisonstudywithclassicalgbanding AT parksinae theapplicationofaninsitukaryotypingtechniqueformesenchymalstromalcellsavalidationandcomparisonstudywithclassicalgbanding AT imkyongok theapplicationofaninsitukaryotypingtechniqueformesenchymalstromalcellsavalidationandcomparisonstudywithclassicalgbanding AT ohilhoan theapplicationofaninsitukaryotypingtechniqueformesenchymalstromalcellsavalidationandcomparisonstudywithclassicalgbanding AT leedongsoon theapplicationofaninsitukaryotypingtechniqueformesenchymalstromalcellsavalidationandcomparisonstudywithclassicalgbanding AT hwangsangmee applicationofaninsitukaryotypingtechniqueformesenchymalstromalcellsavalidationandcomparisonstudywithclassicalgbanding AT seechaja applicationofaninsitukaryotypingtechniqueformesenchymalstromalcellsavalidationandcomparisonstudywithclassicalgbanding AT choijungeun applicationofaninsitukaryotypingtechniqueformesenchymalstromalcellsavalidationandcomparisonstudywithclassicalgbanding AT kimseonyoung applicationofaninsitukaryotypingtechniqueformesenchymalstromalcellsavalidationandcomparisonstudywithclassicalgbanding AT choiqute applicationofaninsitukaryotypingtechniqueformesenchymalstromalcellsavalidationandcomparisonstudywithclassicalgbanding AT kimjungah applicationofaninsitukaryotypingtechniqueformesenchymalstromalcellsavalidationandcomparisonstudywithclassicalgbanding AT kwonjiseok applicationofaninsitukaryotypingtechniqueformesenchymalstromalcellsavalidationandcomparisonstudywithclassicalgbanding AT parksinae applicationofaninsitukaryotypingtechniqueformesenchymalstromalcellsavalidationandcomparisonstudywithclassicalgbanding AT imkyongok applicationofaninsitukaryotypingtechniqueformesenchymalstromalcellsavalidationandcomparisonstudywithclassicalgbanding AT ohilhoan applicationofaninsitukaryotypingtechniqueformesenchymalstromalcellsavalidationandcomparisonstudywithclassicalgbanding AT leedongsoon applicationofaninsitukaryotypingtechniqueformesenchymalstromalcellsavalidationandcomparisonstudywithclassicalgbanding |