Cargando…
Computed Tomography Colonography Technique: The Role of Intracolonic Gas Volume
Introduction. Poor distention decreases the sensitivity and specificity of CTC. The total volume of gas administered will vary according to many factors. We aim to determine the relationship between the volume of retained gas at the time of image acquisition and colonic distention and specifically t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3880765/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24455246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/517246 |
_version_ | 1782298117194907648 |
---|---|
author | McLaughlin, Patrick D. Murphy, Kevin P. Crush, Lee O'Connor, Owen J. Coyle, Joseph P. Brennan, Cressida R. Suhail, Attiya Kelly, Denis Maher, Michael M. |
author_facet | McLaughlin, Patrick D. Murphy, Kevin P. Crush, Lee O'Connor, Owen J. Coyle, Joseph P. Brennan, Cressida R. Suhail, Attiya Kelly, Denis Maher, Michael M. |
author_sort | McLaughlin, Patrick D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction. Poor distention decreases the sensitivity and specificity of CTC. The total volume of gas administered will vary according to many factors. We aim to determine the relationship between the volume of retained gas at the time of image acquisition and colonic distention and specifically the presence of collapsed bowel segments at CTC. Materials and Methods. All patients who underwent CTC over a 12-month period at a single institution were included in the study. Colonic luminal distention was objectively scored by 2 radiologists using an established 4-point scale. Quantitative analysis of the volume of retained gas at the time of image acquisition was conducted using the threshold 3D region growing function of OsiriX. Results. 108 patients were included for volumetric analysis. Mean retained gas volume was 3.3 L. 35% (38/108) of patients had at least one collapsed colonic segment. Significantly lower gas volumes were observed in the patients with collapsed colonic segments when compared with those with fully distended colons 2.6 L versus 3.5 L (P = 0.031). Retained volumes were significantly higher for the 78% of patients with ileocecal reflux at 3.4 L versus 2.6 L without ileocecal reflux (P = 0.014). Conclusion. Estimation of intraluminal gas volume at CTC is feasible using image segmentation and thresholding tools. An average of 3.5 L of retained gas was found in diagnostically adequate CTC studies with significantly lower mean gas volume observed in patients with collapsed colonic segments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3880765 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38807652014-01-20 Computed Tomography Colonography Technique: The Role of Intracolonic Gas Volume McLaughlin, Patrick D. Murphy, Kevin P. Crush, Lee O'Connor, Owen J. Coyle, Joseph P. Brennan, Cressida R. Suhail, Attiya Kelly, Denis Maher, Michael M. Radiol Res Pract Research Article Introduction. Poor distention decreases the sensitivity and specificity of CTC. The total volume of gas administered will vary according to many factors. We aim to determine the relationship between the volume of retained gas at the time of image acquisition and colonic distention and specifically the presence of collapsed bowel segments at CTC. Materials and Methods. All patients who underwent CTC over a 12-month period at a single institution were included in the study. Colonic luminal distention was objectively scored by 2 radiologists using an established 4-point scale. Quantitative analysis of the volume of retained gas at the time of image acquisition was conducted using the threshold 3D region growing function of OsiriX. Results. 108 patients were included for volumetric analysis. Mean retained gas volume was 3.3 L. 35% (38/108) of patients had at least one collapsed colonic segment. Significantly lower gas volumes were observed in the patients with collapsed colonic segments when compared with those with fully distended colons 2.6 L versus 3.5 L (P = 0.031). Retained volumes were significantly higher for the 78% of patients with ileocecal reflux at 3.4 L versus 2.6 L without ileocecal reflux (P = 0.014). Conclusion. Estimation of intraluminal gas volume at CTC is feasible using image segmentation and thresholding tools. An average of 3.5 L of retained gas was found in diagnostically adequate CTC studies with significantly lower mean gas volume observed in patients with collapsed colonic segments. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3880765/ /pubmed/24455246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/517246 Text en Copyright © 2013 Patrick D. McLaughlin et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article McLaughlin, Patrick D. Murphy, Kevin P. Crush, Lee O'Connor, Owen J. Coyle, Joseph P. Brennan, Cressida R. Suhail, Attiya Kelly, Denis Maher, Michael M. Computed Tomography Colonography Technique: The Role of Intracolonic Gas Volume |
title | Computed Tomography Colonography Technique: The Role of Intracolonic Gas Volume |
title_full | Computed Tomography Colonography Technique: The Role of Intracolonic Gas Volume |
title_fullStr | Computed Tomography Colonography Technique: The Role of Intracolonic Gas Volume |
title_full_unstemmed | Computed Tomography Colonography Technique: The Role of Intracolonic Gas Volume |
title_short | Computed Tomography Colonography Technique: The Role of Intracolonic Gas Volume |
title_sort | computed tomography colonography technique: the role of intracolonic gas volume |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3880765/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24455246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/517246 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mclaughlinpatrickd computedtomographycolonographytechniquetheroleofintracolonicgasvolume AT murphykevinp computedtomographycolonographytechniquetheroleofintracolonicgasvolume AT crushlee computedtomographycolonographytechniquetheroleofintracolonicgasvolume AT oconnorowenj computedtomographycolonographytechniquetheroleofintracolonicgasvolume AT coylejosephp computedtomographycolonographytechniquetheroleofintracolonicgasvolume AT brennancressidar computedtomographycolonographytechniquetheroleofintracolonicgasvolume AT suhailattiya computedtomographycolonographytechniquetheroleofintracolonicgasvolume AT kellydenis computedtomographycolonographytechniquetheroleofintracolonicgasvolume AT mahermichaelm computedtomographycolonographytechniquetheroleofintracolonicgasvolume |