Cargando…

Computed Tomography Colonography Technique: The Role of Intracolonic Gas Volume

Introduction. Poor distention decreases the sensitivity and specificity of CTC. The total volume of gas administered will vary according to many factors. We aim to determine the relationship between the volume of retained gas at the time of image acquisition and colonic distention and specifically t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McLaughlin, Patrick D., Murphy, Kevin P., Crush, Lee, O'Connor, Owen J., Coyle, Joseph P., Brennan, Cressida R., Suhail, Attiya, Kelly, Denis, Maher, Michael M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3880765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24455246
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/517246
_version_ 1782298117194907648
author McLaughlin, Patrick D.
Murphy, Kevin P.
Crush, Lee
O'Connor, Owen J.
Coyle, Joseph P.
Brennan, Cressida R.
Suhail, Attiya
Kelly, Denis
Maher, Michael M.
author_facet McLaughlin, Patrick D.
Murphy, Kevin P.
Crush, Lee
O'Connor, Owen J.
Coyle, Joseph P.
Brennan, Cressida R.
Suhail, Attiya
Kelly, Denis
Maher, Michael M.
author_sort McLaughlin, Patrick D.
collection PubMed
description Introduction. Poor distention decreases the sensitivity and specificity of CTC. The total volume of gas administered will vary according to many factors. We aim to determine the relationship between the volume of retained gas at the time of image acquisition and colonic distention and specifically the presence of collapsed bowel segments at CTC. Materials and Methods. All patients who underwent CTC over a 12-month period at a single institution were included in the study. Colonic luminal distention was objectively scored by 2 radiologists using an established 4-point scale. Quantitative analysis of the volume of retained gas at the time of image acquisition was conducted using the threshold 3D region growing function of OsiriX. Results. 108 patients were included for volumetric analysis. Mean retained gas volume was 3.3 L. 35% (38/108) of patients had at least one collapsed colonic segment. Significantly lower gas volumes were observed in the patients with collapsed colonic segments when compared with those with fully distended colons 2.6 L versus 3.5 L (P = 0.031). Retained volumes were significantly higher for the 78% of patients with ileocecal reflux at 3.4 L versus 2.6 L without ileocecal reflux (P = 0.014). Conclusion. Estimation of intraluminal gas volume at CTC is feasible using image segmentation and thresholding tools. An average of 3.5 L of retained gas was found in diagnostically adequate CTC studies with significantly lower mean gas volume observed in patients with collapsed colonic segments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3880765
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38807652014-01-20 Computed Tomography Colonography Technique: The Role of Intracolonic Gas Volume McLaughlin, Patrick D. Murphy, Kevin P. Crush, Lee O'Connor, Owen J. Coyle, Joseph P. Brennan, Cressida R. Suhail, Attiya Kelly, Denis Maher, Michael M. Radiol Res Pract Research Article Introduction. Poor distention decreases the sensitivity and specificity of CTC. The total volume of gas administered will vary according to many factors. We aim to determine the relationship between the volume of retained gas at the time of image acquisition and colonic distention and specifically the presence of collapsed bowel segments at CTC. Materials and Methods. All patients who underwent CTC over a 12-month period at a single institution were included in the study. Colonic luminal distention was objectively scored by 2 radiologists using an established 4-point scale. Quantitative analysis of the volume of retained gas at the time of image acquisition was conducted using the threshold 3D region growing function of OsiriX. Results. 108 patients were included for volumetric analysis. Mean retained gas volume was 3.3 L. 35% (38/108) of patients had at least one collapsed colonic segment. Significantly lower gas volumes were observed in the patients with collapsed colonic segments when compared with those with fully distended colons 2.6 L versus 3.5 L (P = 0.031). Retained volumes were significantly higher for the 78% of patients with ileocecal reflux at 3.4 L versus 2.6 L without ileocecal reflux (P = 0.014). Conclusion. Estimation of intraluminal gas volume at CTC is feasible using image segmentation and thresholding tools. An average of 3.5 L of retained gas was found in diagnostically adequate CTC studies with significantly lower mean gas volume observed in patients with collapsed colonic segments. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3880765/ /pubmed/24455246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/517246 Text en Copyright © 2013 Patrick D. McLaughlin et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
McLaughlin, Patrick D.
Murphy, Kevin P.
Crush, Lee
O'Connor, Owen J.
Coyle, Joseph P.
Brennan, Cressida R.
Suhail, Attiya
Kelly, Denis
Maher, Michael M.
Computed Tomography Colonography Technique: The Role of Intracolonic Gas Volume
title Computed Tomography Colonography Technique: The Role of Intracolonic Gas Volume
title_full Computed Tomography Colonography Technique: The Role of Intracolonic Gas Volume
title_fullStr Computed Tomography Colonography Technique: The Role of Intracolonic Gas Volume
title_full_unstemmed Computed Tomography Colonography Technique: The Role of Intracolonic Gas Volume
title_short Computed Tomography Colonography Technique: The Role of Intracolonic Gas Volume
title_sort computed tomography colonography technique: the role of intracolonic gas volume
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3880765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24455246
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/517246
work_keys_str_mv AT mclaughlinpatrickd computedtomographycolonographytechniquetheroleofintracolonicgasvolume
AT murphykevinp computedtomographycolonographytechniquetheroleofintracolonicgasvolume
AT crushlee computedtomographycolonographytechniquetheroleofintracolonicgasvolume
AT oconnorowenj computedtomographycolonographytechniquetheroleofintracolonicgasvolume
AT coylejosephp computedtomographycolonographytechniquetheroleofintracolonicgasvolume
AT brennancressidar computedtomographycolonographytechniquetheroleofintracolonicgasvolume
AT suhailattiya computedtomographycolonographytechniquetheroleofintracolonicgasvolume
AT kellydenis computedtomographycolonographytechniquetheroleofintracolonicgasvolume
AT mahermichaelm computedtomographycolonographytechniquetheroleofintracolonicgasvolume