Cargando…

Optimizing manufacturing and composition of a TLR4 nanosuspension: physicochemical stability and vaccine adjuvant activity

BACKGROUND: Nanosuspensions are an important class of delivery system for vaccine adjuvants and drugs. Previously, we developed a nanosuspension consisting of the synthetic TLR4 ligand glucopyranosyl lipid adjuvant (GLA) and dipalmitoyl phosphatidylcholine (DPPC). This nanosuspension is a clinical v...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fung, HW Millie, Mikasa, Traci JT, Vergara, Julie, Sivananthan, Sandra J, Guderian, Jeffrey A, Duthie, Malcolm S, Vedvick, Thomas S, Fox, Christopher B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3881025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24359024
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-3155-11-43
_version_ 1782298145577762816
author Fung, HW Millie
Mikasa, Traci JT
Vergara, Julie
Sivananthan, Sandra J
Guderian, Jeffrey A
Duthie, Malcolm S
Vedvick, Thomas S
Fox, Christopher B
author_facet Fung, HW Millie
Mikasa, Traci JT
Vergara, Julie
Sivananthan, Sandra J
Guderian, Jeffrey A
Duthie, Malcolm S
Vedvick, Thomas S
Fox, Christopher B
author_sort Fung, HW Millie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Nanosuspensions are an important class of delivery system for vaccine adjuvants and drugs. Previously, we developed a nanosuspension consisting of the synthetic TLR4 ligand glucopyranosyl lipid adjuvant (GLA) and dipalmitoyl phosphatidylcholine (DPPC). This nanosuspension is a clinical vaccine adjuvant known as GLA-AF. We examined the effects of DPPC supplier, buffer composition, and manufacturing process on GLA-AF physicochemical and biological activity characteristics. RESULTS: DPPC from different suppliers had minimal influence on physicochemical and biological effects. In general, buffered compositions resulted in less particle size stability compared to unbuffered GLA-AF. Microfluidization resulted in rapid particle size reduction after only a few passes, and 20,000 or 30,000 psi processing pressures were more effective at reducing particle size and recovering the active component than 10,000 psi. Sonicated and microfluidized batches maintained good particle size and chemical stability over 6 months, without significantly altering in vitro or in vivo bioactivity of GLA-AF when combined with a recombinant malaria vaccine antigen. CONCLUSIONS: Microfluidization, compared to water bath sonication, may be an effective manufacturing process to improve the scalability and reproducibility of GLA-AF as it advances further in the clinical development pathway. Various sources of DPPC are suitable to manufacture GLA-AF, but buffered compositions of GLA-AF do not appear to offer stability advantages over the unbuffered composition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3881025
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38810252014-01-07 Optimizing manufacturing and composition of a TLR4 nanosuspension: physicochemical stability and vaccine adjuvant activity Fung, HW Millie Mikasa, Traci JT Vergara, Julie Sivananthan, Sandra J Guderian, Jeffrey A Duthie, Malcolm S Vedvick, Thomas S Fox, Christopher B J Nanobiotechnology Research BACKGROUND: Nanosuspensions are an important class of delivery system for vaccine adjuvants and drugs. Previously, we developed a nanosuspension consisting of the synthetic TLR4 ligand glucopyranosyl lipid adjuvant (GLA) and dipalmitoyl phosphatidylcholine (DPPC). This nanosuspension is a clinical vaccine adjuvant known as GLA-AF. We examined the effects of DPPC supplier, buffer composition, and manufacturing process on GLA-AF physicochemical and biological activity characteristics. RESULTS: DPPC from different suppliers had minimal influence on physicochemical and biological effects. In general, buffered compositions resulted in less particle size stability compared to unbuffered GLA-AF. Microfluidization resulted in rapid particle size reduction after only a few passes, and 20,000 or 30,000 psi processing pressures were more effective at reducing particle size and recovering the active component than 10,000 psi. Sonicated and microfluidized batches maintained good particle size and chemical stability over 6 months, without significantly altering in vitro or in vivo bioactivity of GLA-AF when combined with a recombinant malaria vaccine antigen. CONCLUSIONS: Microfluidization, compared to water bath sonication, may be an effective manufacturing process to improve the scalability and reproducibility of GLA-AF as it advances further in the clinical development pathway. Various sources of DPPC are suitable to manufacture GLA-AF, but buffered compositions of GLA-AF do not appear to offer stability advantages over the unbuffered composition. BioMed Central 2013-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3881025/ /pubmed/24359024 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-3155-11-43 Text en Copyright © 2013 Fung et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Fung, HW Millie
Mikasa, Traci JT
Vergara, Julie
Sivananthan, Sandra J
Guderian, Jeffrey A
Duthie, Malcolm S
Vedvick, Thomas S
Fox, Christopher B
Optimizing manufacturing and composition of a TLR4 nanosuspension: physicochemical stability and vaccine adjuvant activity
title Optimizing manufacturing and composition of a TLR4 nanosuspension: physicochemical stability and vaccine adjuvant activity
title_full Optimizing manufacturing and composition of a TLR4 nanosuspension: physicochemical stability and vaccine adjuvant activity
title_fullStr Optimizing manufacturing and composition of a TLR4 nanosuspension: physicochemical stability and vaccine adjuvant activity
title_full_unstemmed Optimizing manufacturing and composition of a TLR4 nanosuspension: physicochemical stability and vaccine adjuvant activity
title_short Optimizing manufacturing and composition of a TLR4 nanosuspension: physicochemical stability and vaccine adjuvant activity
title_sort optimizing manufacturing and composition of a tlr4 nanosuspension: physicochemical stability and vaccine adjuvant activity
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3881025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24359024
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-3155-11-43
work_keys_str_mv AT funghwmillie optimizingmanufacturingandcompositionofatlr4nanosuspensionphysicochemicalstabilityandvaccineadjuvantactivity
AT mikasatracijt optimizingmanufacturingandcompositionofatlr4nanosuspensionphysicochemicalstabilityandvaccineadjuvantactivity
AT vergarajulie optimizingmanufacturingandcompositionofatlr4nanosuspensionphysicochemicalstabilityandvaccineadjuvantactivity
AT sivananthansandraj optimizingmanufacturingandcompositionofatlr4nanosuspensionphysicochemicalstabilityandvaccineadjuvantactivity
AT guderianjeffreya optimizingmanufacturingandcompositionofatlr4nanosuspensionphysicochemicalstabilityandvaccineadjuvantactivity
AT duthiemalcolms optimizingmanufacturingandcompositionofatlr4nanosuspensionphysicochemicalstabilityandvaccineadjuvantactivity
AT vedvickthomass optimizingmanufacturingandcompositionofatlr4nanosuspensionphysicochemicalstabilityandvaccineadjuvantactivity
AT foxchristopherb optimizingmanufacturingandcompositionofatlr4nanosuspensionphysicochemicalstabilityandvaccineadjuvantactivity