Cargando…
Improving Conventional Enhanced Permeability and Retention (EPR) Effects; What Is the Appropriate Target?
Nano-sized therapeutic agents have several advantages over low molecular weight agents such as a larger loading capacity, the ability to protect the payload until delivery, more specific targeting due to multivalency and the opportunity for controlled/sustained release. However, the delivery of nano...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Ivyspring International Publisher
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3881228/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24396516 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/thno.7193 |
_version_ | 1782298185191915520 |
---|---|
author | Kobayashi, Hisataka Watanabe, Rira Choyke, Peter L. |
author_facet | Kobayashi, Hisataka Watanabe, Rira Choyke, Peter L. |
author_sort | Kobayashi, Hisataka |
collection | PubMed |
description | Nano-sized therapeutic agents have several advantages over low molecular weight agents such as a larger loading capacity, the ability to protect the payload until delivery, more specific targeting due to multivalency and the opportunity for controlled/sustained release. However, the delivery of nano-sized agents into cancer tissue is problematic because it mostly relies on the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect that depends on the leaky nature of the tumor vasculature and the prolonged circulation of nano-sized agents, allowing slow but uneven accumulation in the tumor bed. Delivery of nano-sized agents is dependent on several factors that influence the EPR effect; 1. Regional blood flow to the tumor, 2. Permeability of the tumor vasculature, 3. Structural barriers imposed by perivascular tumor cells and extracellular matrix, 4. Intratumoral pressure. In this review, these factors will be described and methods to enhance nano-agent delivery will be reviewed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3881228 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Ivyspring International Publisher |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38812282014-01-06 Improving Conventional Enhanced Permeability and Retention (EPR) Effects; What Is the Appropriate Target? Kobayashi, Hisataka Watanabe, Rira Choyke, Peter L. Theranostics Review Nano-sized therapeutic agents have several advantages over low molecular weight agents such as a larger loading capacity, the ability to protect the payload until delivery, more specific targeting due to multivalency and the opportunity for controlled/sustained release. However, the delivery of nano-sized agents into cancer tissue is problematic because it mostly relies on the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect that depends on the leaky nature of the tumor vasculature and the prolonged circulation of nano-sized agents, allowing slow but uneven accumulation in the tumor bed. Delivery of nano-sized agents is dependent on several factors that influence the EPR effect; 1. Regional blood flow to the tumor, 2. Permeability of the tumor vasculature, 3. Structural barriers imposed by perivascular tumor cells and extracellular matrix, 4. Intratumoral pressure. In this review, these factors will be described and methods to enhance nano-agent delivery will be reviewed. Ivyspring International Publisher 2013-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3881228/ /pubmed/24396516 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/thno.7193 Text en © Ivyspring International Publisher. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/). Reproduction is permitted for personal, noncommercial use, provided that the article is in whole, unmodified, and properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Kobayashi, Hisataka Watanabe, Rira Choyke, Peter L. Improving Conventional Enhanced Permeability and Retention (EPR) Effects; What Is the Appropriate Target? |
title | Improving Conventional Enhanced Permeability and Retention (EPR) Effects; What Is the Appropriate Target? |
title_full | Improving Conventional Enhanced Permeability and Retention (EPR) Effects; What Is the Appropriate Target? |
title_fullStr | Improving Conventional Enhanced Permeability and Retention (EPR) Effects; What Is the Appropriate Target? |
title_full_unstemmed | Improving Conventional Enhanced Permeability and Retention (EPR) Effects; What Is the Appropriate Target? |
title_short | Improving Conventional Enhanced Permeability and Retention (EPR) Effects; What Is the Appropriate Target? |
title_sort | improving conventional enhanced permeability and retention (epr) effects; what is the appropriate target? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3881228/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24396516 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/thno.7193 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kobayashihisataka improvingconventionalenhancedpermeabilityandretentionepreffectswhatistheappropriatetarget AT watanaberira improvingconventionalenhancedpermeabilityandretentionepreffectswhatistheappropriatetarget AT choykepeterl improvingconventionalenhancedpermeabilityandretentionepreffectswhatistheappropriatetarget |