Cargando…

Improving Conventional Enhanced Permeability and Retention (EPR) Effects; What Is the Appropriate Target?

Nano-sized therapeutic agents have several advantages over low molecular weight agents such as a larger loading capacity, the ability to protect the payload until delivery, more specific targeting due to multivalency and the opportunity for controlled/sustained release. However, the delivery of nano...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kobayashi, Hisataka, Watanabe, Rira, Choyke, Peter L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ivyspring International Publisher 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3881228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24396516
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/thno.7193
_version_ 1782298185191915520
author Kobayashi, Hisataka
Watanabe, Rira
Choyke, Peter L.
author_facet Kobayashi, Hisataka
Watanabe, Rira
Choyke, Peter L.
author_sort Kobayashi, Hisataka
collection PubMed
description Nano-sized therapeutic agents have several advantages over low molecular weight agents such as a larger loading capacity, the ability to protect the payload until delivery, more specific targeting due to multivalency and the opportunity for controlled/sustained release. However, the delivery of nano-sized agents into cancer tissue is problematic because it mostly relies on the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect that depends on the leaky nature of the tumor vasculature and the prolonged circulation of nano-sized agents, allowing slow but uneven accumulation in the tumor bed. Delivery of nano-sized agents is dependent on several factors that influence the EPR effect; 1. Regional blood flow to the tumor, 2. Permeability of the tumor vasculature, 3. Structural barriers imposed by perivascular tumor cells and extracellular matrix, 4. Intratumoral pressure. In this review, these factors will be described and methods to enhance nano-agent delivery will be reviewed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3881228
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Ivyspring International Publisher
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38812282014-01-06 Improving Conventional Enhanced Permeability and Retention (EPR) Effects; What Is the Appropriate Target? Kobayashi, Hisataka Watanabe, Rira Choyke, Peter L. Theranostics Review Nano-sized therapeutic agents have several advantages over low molecular weight agents such as a larger loading capacity, the ability to protect the payload until delivery, more specific targeting due to multivalency and the opportunity for controlled/sustained release. However, the delivery of nano-sized agents into cancer tissue is problematic because it mostly relies on the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect that depends on the leaky nature of the tumor vasculature and the prolonged circulation of nano-sized agents, allowing slow but uneven accumulation in the tumor bed. Delivery of nano-sized agents is dependent on several factors that influence the EPR effect; 1. Regional blood flow to the tumor, 2. Permeability of the tumor vasculature, 3. Structural barriers imposed by perivascular tumor cells and extracellular matrix, 4. Intratumoral pressure. In this review, these factors will be described and methods to enhance nano-agent delivery will be reviewed. Ivyspring International Publisher 2013-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3881228/ /pubmed/24396516 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/thno.7193 Text en © Ivyspring International Publisher. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/). Reproduction is permitted for personal, noncommercial use, provided that the article is in whole, unmodified, and properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Kobayashi, Hisataka
Watanabe, Rira
Choyke, Peter L.
Improving Conventional Enhanced Permeability and Retention (EPR) Effects; What Is the Appropriate Target?
title Improving Conventional Enhanced Permeability and Retention (EPR) Effects; What Is the Appropriate Target?
title_full Improving Conventional Enhanced Permeability and Retention (EPR) Effects; What Is the Appropriate Target?
title_fullStr Improving Conventional Enhanced Permeability and Retention (EPR) Effects; What Is the Appropriate Target?
title_full_unstemmed Improving Conventional Enhanced Permeability and Retention (EPR) Effects; What Is the Appropriate Target?
title_short Improving Conventional Enhanced Permeability and Retention (EPR) Effects; What Is the Appropriate Target?
title_sort improving conventional enhanced permeability and retention (epr) effects; what is the appropriate target?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3881228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24396516
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/thno.7193
work_keys_str_mv AT kobayashihisataka improvingconventionalenhancedpermeabilityandretentionepreffectswhatistheappropriatetarget
AT watanaberira improvingconventionalenhancedpermeabilityandretentionepreffectswhatistheappropriatetarget
AT choykepeterl improvingconventionalenhancedpermeabilityandretentionepreffectswhatistheappropriatetarget