Cargando…

The Impact of Adjustment for Socioeconomic Status on Comparisons of Cancer Incidence between Two European Countries

Background. Cancer incidence rates vary considerably between countries and by socioeconomic status (SES). We investigate the impact of SES upon the relative cancer risk in two neighbouring countries. Methods. Data on 229,824 cases for 16 cancers diagnosed in 1995–2007 were extracted from the cancer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Donnelly, David W., Hegarty, Avril, Sharp, Linda, Carsin, Anne-Elie, Deady, Sandra, McCluskey, Neil, Comber, Harry, Gavin, Anna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3881585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24454373
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/612514
_version_ 1782298238186946560
author Donnelly, David W.
Hegarty, Avril
Sharp, Linda
Carsin, Anne-Elie
Deady, Sandra
McCluskey, Neil
Comber, Harry
Gavin, Anna
author_facet Donnelly, David W.
Hegarty, Avril
Sharp, Linda
Carsin, Anne-Elie
Deady, Sandra
McCluskey, Neil
Comber, Harry
Gavin, Anna
author_sort Donnelly, David W.
collection PubMed
description Background. Cancer incidence rates vary considerably between countries and by socioeconomic status (SES). We investigate the impact of SES upon the relative cancer risk in two neighbouring countries. Methods. Data on 229,824 cases for 16 cancers diagnosed in 1995–2007 were extracted from the cancer registries in Northern Ireland (NI) and Republic of Ireland (RoI). Cancers in the two countries were compared using incidence rate ratios (IRRs) adjusted for age and age plus area-based SES. Results. Adjusting for SES in addition to age had a considerable impact on NI/RoI comparisons for cancers strongly related to SES. Before SES adjustment, lung cancer incidence rates were 11% higher for males and 7% higher for females in NI, while after adjustment, the IRR was not statistically significant. Cervical cancer rates were lower in NI than in RoI after adjustment for age (IRR: 0.90 (0.84–0.97)), with this difference increasing after adjustment for SES (IRR: 0.85 (0.79–0.92)). For cancers with a weak or nonexistent relationship to SES, adjustment for SES made little difference to the IRR. Conclusion. Socioeconomic factors explain some international variations but also obscure other crucial differences; thus, adjustment for these factors should not become part of international comparisons.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3881585
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38815852014-01-20 The Impact of Adjustment for Socioeconomic Status on Comparisons of Cancer Incidence between Two European Countries Donnelly, David W. Hegarty, Avril Sharp, Linda Carsin, Anne-Elie Deady, Sandra McCluskey, Neil Comber, Harry Gavin, Anna J Cancer Epidemiol Research Article Background. Cancer incidence rates vary considerably between countries and by socioeconomic status (SES). We investigate the impact of SES upon the relative cancer risk in two neighbouring countries. Methods. Data on 229,824 cases for 16 cancers diagnosed in 1995–2007 were extracted from the cancer registries in Northern Ireland (NI) and Republic of Ireland (RoI). Cancers in the two countries were compared using incidence rate ratios (IRRs) adjusted for age and age plus area-based SES. Results. Adjusting for SES in addition to age had a considerable impact on NI/RoI comparisons for cancers strongly related to SES. Before SES adjustment, lung cancer incidence rates were 11% higher for males and 7% higher for females in NI, while after adjustment, the IRR was not statistically significant. Cervical cancer rates were lower in NI than in RoI after adjustment for age (IRR: 0.90 (0.84–0.97)), with this difference increasing after adjustment for SES (IRR: 0.85 (0.79–0.92)). For cancers with a weak or nonexistent relationship to SES, adjustment for SES made little difference to the IRR. Conclusion. Socioeconomic factors explain some international variations but also obscure other crucial differences; thus, adjustment for these factors should not become part of international comparisons. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3881585/ /pubmed/24454373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/612514 Text en Copyright © 2013 David W. Donnelly et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Donnelly, David W.
Hegarty, Avril
Sharp, Linda
Carsin, Anne-Elie
Deady, Sandra
McCluskey, Neil
Comber, Harry
Gavin, Anna
The Impact of Adjustment for Socioeconomic Status on Comparisons of Cancer Incidence between Two European Countries
title The Impact of Adjustment for Socioeconomic Status on Comparisons of Cancer Incidence between Two European Countries
title_full The Impact of Adjustment for Socioeconomic Status on Comparisons of Cancer Incidence between Two European Countries
title_fullStr The Impact of Adjustment for Socioeconomic Status on Comparisons of Cancer Incidence between Two European Countries
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Adjustment for Socioeconomic Status on Comparisons of Cancer Incidence between Two European Countries
title_short The Impact of Adjustment for Socioeconomic Status on Comparisons of Cancer Incidence between Two European Countries
title_sort impact of adjustment for socioeconomic status on comparisons of cancer incidence between two european countries
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3881585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24454373
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/612514
work_keys_str_mv AT donnellydavidw theimpactofadjustmentforsocioeconomicstatusoncomparisonsofcancerincidencebetweentwoeuropeancountries
AT hegartyavril theimpactofadjustmentforsocioeconomicstatusoncomparisonsofcancerincidencebetweentwoeuropeancountries
AT sharplinda theimpactofadjustmentforsocioeconomicstatusoncomparisonsofcancerincidencebetweentwoeuropeancountries
AT carsinanneelie theimpactofadjustmentforsocioeconomicstatusoncomparisonsofcancerincidencebetweentwoeuropeancountries
AT deadysandra theimpactofadjustmentforsocioeconomicstatusoncomparisonsofcancerincidencebetweentwoeuropeancountries
AT mccluskeyneil theimpactofadjustmentforsocioeconomicstatusoncomparisonsofcancerincidencebetweentwoeuropeancountries
AT comberharry theimpactofadjustmentforsocioeconomicstatusoncomparisonsofcancerincidencebetweentwoeuropeancountries
AT gavinanna theimpactofadjustmentforsocioeconomicstatusoncomparisonsofcancerincidencebetweentwoeuropeancountries
AT donnellydavidw impactofadjustmentforsocioeconomicstatusoncomparisonsofcancerincidencebetweentwoeuropeancountries
AT hegartyavril impactofadjustmentforsocioeconomicstatusoncomparisonsofcancerincidencebetweentwoeuropeancountries
AT sharplinda impactofadjustmentforsocioeconomicstatusoncomparisonsofcancerincidencebetweentwoeuropeancountries
AT carsinanneelie impactofadjustmentforsocioeconomicstatusoncomparisonsofcancerincidencebetweentwoeuropeancountries
AT deadysandra impactofadjustmentforsocioeconomicstatusoncomparisonsofcancerincidencebetweentwoeuropeancountries
AT mccluskeyneil impactofadjustmentforsocioeconomicstatusoncomparisonsofcancerincidencebetweentwoeuropeancountries
AT comberharry impactofadjustmentforsocioeconomicstatusoncomparisonsofcancerincidencebetweentwoeuropeancountries
AT gavinanna impactofadjustmentforsocioeconomicstatusoncomparisonsofcancerincidencebetweentwoeuropeancountries