Cargando…
The Impact of Adjustment for Socioeconomic Status on Comparisons of Cancer Incidence between Two European Countries
Background. Cancer incidence rates vary considerably between countries and by socioeconomic status (SES). We investigate the impact of SES upon the relative cancer risk in two neighbouring countries. Methods. Data on 229,824 cases for 16 cancers diagnosed in 1995–2007 were extracted from the cancer...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3881585/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24454373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/612514 |
_version_ | 1782298238186946560 |
---|---|
author | Donnelly, David W. Hegarty, Avril Sharp, Linda Carsin, Anne-Elie Deady, Sandra McCluskey, Neil Comber, Harry Gavin, Anna |
author_facet | Donnelly, David W. Hegarty, Avril Sharp, Linda Carsin, Anne-Elie Deady, Sandra McCluskey, Neil Comber, Harry Gavin, Anna |
author_sort | Donnelly, David W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background. Cancer incidence rates vary considerably between countries and by socioeconomic status (SES). We investigate the impact of SES upon the relative cancer risk in two neighbouring countries. Methods. Data on 229,824 cases for 16 cancers diagnosed in 1995–2007 were extracted from the cancer registries in Northern Ireland (NI) and Republic of Ireland (RoI). Cancers in the two countries were compared using incidence rate ratios (IRRs) adjusted for age and age plus area-based SES. Results. Adjusting for SES in addition to age had a considerable impact on NI/RoI comparisons for cancers strongly related to SES. Before SES adjustment, lung cancer incidence rates were 11% higher for males and 7% higher for females in NI, while after adjustment, the IRR was not statistically significant. Cervical cancer rates were lower in NI than in RoI after adjustment for age (IRR: 0.90 (0.84–0.97)), with this difference increasing after adjustment for SES (IRR: 0.85 (0.79–0.92)). For cancers with a weak or nonexistent relationship to SES, adjustment for SES made little difference to the IRR. Conclusion. Socioeconomic factors explain some international variations but also obscure other crucial differences; thus, adjustment for these factors should not become part of international comparisons. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3881585 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38815852014-01-20 The Impact of Adjustment for Socioeconomic Status on Comparisons of Cancer Incidence between Two European Countries Donnelly, David W. Hegarty, Avril Sharp, Linda Carsin, Anne-Elie Deady, Sandra McCluskey, Neil Comber, Harry Gavin, Anna J Cancer Epidemiol Research Article Background. Cancer incidence rates vary considerably between countries and by socioeconomic status (SES). We investigate the impact of SES upon the relative cancer risk in two neighbouring countries. Methods. Data on 229,824 cases for 16 cancers diagnosed in 1995–2007 were extracted from the cancer registries in Northern Ireland (NI) and Republic of Ireland (RoI). Cancers in the two countries were compared using incidence rate ratios (IRRs) adjusted for age and age plus area-based SES. Results. Adjusting for SES in addition to age had a considerable impact on NI/RoI comparisons for cancers strongly related to SES. Before SES adjustment, lung cancer incidence rates were 11% higher for males and 7% higher for females in NI, while after adjustment, the IRR was not statistically significant. Cervical cancer rates were lower in NI than in RoI after adjustment for age (IRR: 0.90 (0.84–0.97)), with this difference increasing after adjustment for SES (IRR: 0.85 (0.79–0.92)). For cancers with a weak or nonexistent relationship to SES, adjustment for SES made little difference to the IRR. Conclusion. Socioeconomic factors explain some international variations but also obscure other crucial differences; thus, adjustment for these factors should not become part of international comparisons. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3881585/ /pubmed/24454373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/612514 Text en Copyright © 2013 David W. Donnelly et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Donnelly, David W. Hegarty, Avril Sharp, Linda Carsin, Anne-Elie Deady, Sandra McCluskey, Neil Comber, Harry Gavin, Anna The Impact of Adjustment for Socioeconomic Status on Comparisons of Cancer Incidence between Two European Countries |
title | The Impact of Adjustment for Socioeconomic Status on Comparisons of Cancer Incidence between Two European Countries |
title_full | The Impact of Adjustment for Socioeconomic Status on Comparisons of Cancer Incidence between Two European Countries |
title_fullStr | The Impact of Adjustment for Socioeconomic Status on Comparisons of Cancer Incidence between Two European Countries |
title_full_unstemmed | The Impact of Adjustment for Socioeconomic Status on Comparisons of Cancer Incidence between Two European Countries |
title_short | The Impact of Adjustment for Socioeconomic Status on Comparisons of Cancer Incidence between Two European Countries |
title_sort | impact of adjustment for socioeconomic status on comparisons of cancer incidence between two european countries |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3881585/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24454373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/612514 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT donnellydavidw theimpactofadjustmentforsocioeconomicstatusoncomparisonsofcancerincidencebetweentwoeuropeancountries AT hegartyavril theimpactofadjustmentforsocioeconomicstatusoncomparisonsofcancerincidencebetweentwoeuropeancountries AT sharplinda theimpactofadjustmentforsocioeconomicstatusoncomparisonsofcancerincidencebetweentwoeuropeancountries AT carsinanneelie theimpactofadjustmentforsocioeconomicstatusoncomparisonsofcancerincidencebetweentwoeuropeancountries AT deadysandra theimpactofadjustmentforsocioeconomicstatusoncomparisonsofcancerincidencebetweentwoeuropeancountries AT mccluskeyneil theimpactofadjustmentforsocioeconomicstatusoncomparisonsofcancerincidencebetweentwoeuropeancountries AT comberharry theimpactofadjustmentforsocioeconomicstatusoncomparisonsofcancerincidencebetweentwoeuropeancountries AT gavinanna theimpactofadjustmentforsocioeconomicstatusoncomparisonsofcancerincidencebetweentwoeuropeancountries AT donnellydavidw impactofadjustmentforsocioeconomicstatusoncomparisonsofcancerincidencebetweentwoeuropeancountries AT hegartyavril impactofadjustmentforsocioeconomicstatusoncomparisonsofcancerincidencebetweentwoeuropeancountries AT sharplinda impactofadjustmentforsocioeconomicstatusoncomparisonsofcancerincidencebetweentwoeuropeancountries AT carsinanneelie impactofadjustmentforsocioeconomicstatusoncomparisonsofcancerincidencebetweentwoeuropeancountries AT deadysandra impactofadjustmentforsocioeconomicstatusoncomparisonsofcancerincidencebetweentwoeuropeancountries AT mccluskeyneil impactofadjustmentforsocioeconomicstatusoncomparisonsofcancerincidencebetweentwoeuropeancountries AT comberharry impactofadjustmentforsocioeconomicstatusoncomparisonsofcancerincidencebetweentwoeuropeancountries AT gavinanna impactofadjustmentforsocioeconomicstatusoncomparisonsofcancerincidencebetweentwoeuropeancountries |