Cargando…
Evaluating resin-enamel bonds by microshear and microtensile bond strength tests: effects of composite resin
OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to evaluate the effect of resin composite (Filtek Z250 and Filtek Flow Z350) and adhesive system [(Solobond Plus, Futurabond NR (VOCO) and Adper Single Bond (3M ESPE)] on the microtensile (µTBS) and microshear bond strength (µSBS) tests on enamel, and to corre...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São
Paulo
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3881754/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21308290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572010000600010 |
_version_ | 1782298256586309632 |
---|---|
author | de ANDRADE, Andrea Mello MOURA, Sandra Kiss REIS, Alessandra LOGUERCIO, Alessandro Dourado GARCIA, Eugenio Jose GRANDE, Rosa Helena Miranda |
author_facet | de ANDRADE, Andrea Mello MOURA, Sandra Kiss REIS, Alessandra LOGUERCIO, Alessandro Dourado GARCIA, Eugenio Jose GRANDE, Rosa Helena Miranda |
author_sort | de ANDRADE, Andrea Mello |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to evaluate the effect of resin composite (Filtek Z250 and Filtek Flow Z350) and adhesive system [(Solobond Plus, Futurabond NR (VOCO) and Adper Single Bond (3M ESPE)] on the microtensile (µTBS) and microshear bond strength (µSBS) tests on enamel, and to correlate the bond strength means between them. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-six extracted human molars were sectioned to obtain two tooth halves: one for µTBS and the other one for µSBS. Adhesive systems and resin composites were applied to the enamel ground surfaces and light-cured. After storage (37ºC/24 h) specimens were stressed (0.5 mm/ min). Fracture modes were analyzed under scanning electron microscopy. The data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α=0.05). RESULTS: The correlation between tests was estimated with Pearson's product-moment correlation statistics (α =0.05). For both tests only the main factor resin composite was statistically significant (p<0.05). The correlation test detected a positive (r=0.91) and significant (p=0.01) correlation between the tests. CONCLUSIONS: The results were more influenced by the resin type than by the adhesives. Both microbond tests seem to be positive and linearly correlated and can therefore lead to similar conclusions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3881754 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São
Paulo |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38817542014-01-08 Evaluating resin-enamel bonds by microshear and microtensile bond strength tests: effects of composite resin de ANDRADE, Andrea Mello MOURA, Sandra Kiss REIS, Alessandra LOGUERCIO, Alessandro Dourado GARCIA, Eugenio Jose GRANDE, Rosa Helena Miranda J Appl Oral Sci Original Articles OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to evaluate the effect of resin composite (Filtek Z250 and Filtek Flow Z350) and adhesive system [(Solobond Plus, Futurabond NR (VOCO) and Adper Single Bond (3M ESPE)] on the microtensile (µTBS) and microshear bond strength (µSBS) tests on enamel, and to correlate the bond strength means between them. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-six extracted human molars were sectioned to obtain two tooth halves: one for µTBS and the other one for µSBS. Adhesive systems and resin composites were applied to the enamel ground surfaces and light-cured. After storage (37ºC/24 h) specimens were stressed (0.5 mm/ min). Fracture modes were analyzed under scanning electron microscopy. The data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α=0.05). RESULTS: The correlation between tests was estimated with Pearson's product-moment correlation statistics (α =0.05). For both tests only the main factor resin composite was statistically significant (p<0.05). The correlation test detected a positive (r=0.91) and significant (p=0.01) correlation between the tests. CONCLUSIONS: The results were more influenced by the resin type than by the adhesives. Both microbond tests seem to be positive and linearly correlated and can therefore lead to similar conclusions. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC3881754/ /pubmed/21308290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572010000600010 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles de ANDRADE, Andrea Mello MOURA, Sandra Kiss REIS, Alessandra LOGUERCIO, Alessandro Dourado GARCIA, Eugenio Jose GRANDE, Rosa Helena Miranda Evaluating resin-enamel bonds by microshear and microtensile bond strength tests: effects of composite resin |
title | Evaluating resin-enamel bonds by microshear and microtensile bond
strength tests: effects of composite resin |
title_full | Evaluating resin-enamel bonds by microshear and microtensile bond
strength tests: effects of composite resin |
title_fullStr | Evaluating resin-enamel bonds by microshear and microtensile bond
strength tests: effects of composite resin |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating resin-enamel bonds by microshear and microtensile bond
strength tests: effects of composite resin |
title_short | Evaluating resin-enamel bonds by microshear and microtensile bond
strength tests: effects of composite resin |
title_sort | evaluating resin-enamel bonds by microshear and microtensile bond
strength tests: effects of composite resin |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3881754/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21308290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572010000600010 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deandradeandreamello evaluatingresinenamelbondsbymicroshearandmicrotensilebondstrengthtestseffectsofcompositeresin AT mourasandrakiss evaluatingresinenamelbondsbymicroshearandmicrotensilebondstrengthtestseffectsofcompositeresin AT reisalessandra evaluatingresinenamelbondsbymicroshearandmicrotensilebondstrengthtestseffectsofcompositeresin AT loguercioalessandrodourado evaluatingresinenamelbondsbymicroshearandmicrotensilebondstrengthtestseffectsofcompositeresin AT garciaeugeniojose evaluatingresinenamelbondsbymicroshearandmicrotensilebondstrengthtestseffectsofcompositeresin AT granderosahelenamiranda evaluatingresinenamelbondsbymicroshearandmicrotensilebondstrengthtestseffectsofcompositeresin |