Cargando…
Comparison of debris extruded apically and working time used by ProTaper Universal rotary and ProTaper retreatment system during gutta-percha removal
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the in vitro action of ProTaper retreatment files and ProTaper Universal in the retreatment of mandibular premolars. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The amount of debris extruded apically was measured and the time to reach the working length and to complete the...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São
Paulo
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3881755/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21308282 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572010000600002 |
_version_ | 1782298256826433536 |
---|---|
author | UEZU, Mary Kinue Nakamune BRITTO, Maria Leticia Borges NABESHIMA, Cleber K. PALLOTTA, Raul Capp |
author_facet | UEZU, Mary Kinue Nakamune BRITTO, Maria Leticia Borges NABESHIMA, Cleber K. PALLOTTA, Raul Capp |
author_sort | UEZU, Mary Kinue Nakamune |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the in vitro action of ProTaper retreatment files and ProTaper Universal in the retreatment of mandibular premolars. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The amount of debris extruded apically was measured and the time to reach the working length and to complete the removal of gutta-percha was observed. Thirty teeth had their canals prepared using ProTaper Universal files and were obturated by the single cone technique. The teeth were then stored at 37ºC in a humid environment for 7 days. During the use of the rotary instruments for root canal filling removal, the apical portions of the teeth were attached to the open end of a resin tube to collect the apically extruded debris. RESULTS: ProTaper Universal files were significantly faster (p=0.0011) than the ProTaper retreatment files to perform gutta-percha removal, but no significant difference was found between the files regarding the time to reach the working length or the amount of apical extrusion. CONCLUSIONS: ProTaper Universal rotary had better results for endodontic retreatment, and both techniques promote similar apical extrusion of debris. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3881755 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São
Paulo |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38817552014-01-08 Comparison of debris extruded apically and working time used by ProTaper Universal rotary and ProTaper retreatment system during gutta-percha removal UEZU, Mary Kinue Nakamune BRITTO, Maria Leticia Borges NABESHIMA, Cleber K. PALLOTTA, Raul Capp J Appl Oral Sci Original Articles OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the in vitro action of ProTaper retreatment files and ProTaper Universal in the retreatment of mandibular premolars. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The amount of debris extruded apically was measured and the time to reach the working length and to complete the removal of gutta-percha was observed. Thirty teeth had their canals prepared using ProTaper Universal files and were obturated by the single cone technique. The teeth were then stored at 37ºC in a humid environment for 7 days. During the use of the rotary instruments for root canal filling removal, the apical portions of the teeth were attached to the open end of a resin tube to collect the apically extruded debris. RESULTS: ProTaper Universal files were significantly faster (p=0.0011) than the ProTaper retreatment files to perform gutta-percha removal, but no significant difference was found between the files regarding the time to reach the working length or the amount of apical extrusion. CONCLUSIONS: ProTaper Universal rotary had better results for endodontic retreatment, and both techniques promote similar apical extrusion of debris. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC3881755/ /pubmed/21308282 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572010000600002 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles UEZU, Mary Kinue Nakamune BRITTO, Maria Leticia Borges NABESHIMA, Cleber K. PALLOTTA, Raul Capp Comparison of debris extruded apically and working time used by ProTaper Universal rotary and ProTaper retreatment system during gutta-percha removal |
title | Comparison of debris extruded apically and working time used by ProTaper
Universal rotary and ProTaper retreatment system during gutta-percha
removal |
title_full | Comparison of debris extruded apically and working time used by ProTaper
Universal rotary and ProTaper retreatment system during gutta-percha
removal |
title_fullStr | Comparison of debris extruded apically and working time used by ProTaper
Universal rotary and ProTaper retreatment system during gutta-percha
removal |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of debris extruded apically and working time used by ProTaper
Universal rotary and ProTaper retreatment system during gutta-percha
removal |
title_short | Comparison of debris extruded apically and working time used by ProTaper
Universal rotary and ProTaper retreatment system during gutta-percha
removal |
title_sort | comparison of debris extruded apically and working time used by protaper
universal rotary and protaper retreatment system during gutta-percha
removal |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3881755/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21308282 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572010000600002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT uezumarykinuenakamune comparisonofdebrisextrudedapicallyandworkingtimeusedbyprotaperuniversalrotaryandprotaperretreatmentsystemduringguttapercharemoval AT brittomarialeticiaborges comparisonofdebrisextrudedapicallyandworkingtimeusedbyprotaperuniversalrotaryandprotaperretreatmentsystemduringguttapercharemoval AT nabeshimacleberk comparisonofdebrisextrudedapicallyandworkingtimeusedbyprotaperuniversalrotaryandprotaperretreatmentsystemduringguttapercharemoval AT pallottaraulcapp comparisonofdebrisextrudedapicallyandworkingtimeusedbyprotaperuniversalrotaryandprotaperretreatmentsystemduringguttapercharemoval |