Cargando…

Comparison of debris extruded apically and working time used by ProTaper Universal rotary and ProTaper retreatment system during gutta-percha removal

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the in vitro action of ProTaper retreatment files and ProTaper Universal in the retreatment of mandibular premolars. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The amount of debris extruded apically was measured and the time to reach the working length and to complete the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: UEZU, Mary Kinue Nakamune, BRITTO, Maria Leticia Borges, NABESHIMA, Cleber K., PALLOTTA, Raul Capp
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3881755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21308282
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572010000600002
_version_ 1782298256826433536
author UEZU, Mary Kinue Nakamune
BRITTO, Maria Leticia Borges
NABESHIMA, Cleber K.
PALLOTTA, Raul Capp
author_facet UEZU, Mary Kinue Nakamune
BRITTO, Maria Leticia Borges
NABESHIMA, Cleber K.
PALLOTTA, Raul Capp
author_sort UEZU, Mary Kinue Nakamune
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the in vitro action of ProTaper retreatment files and ProTaper Universal in the retreatment of mandibular premolars. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The amount of debris extruded apically was measured and the time to reach the working length and to complete the removal of gutta-percha was observed. Thirty teeth had their canals prepared using ProTaper Universal files and were obturated by the single cone technique. The teeth were then stored at 37ºC in a humid environment for 7 days. During the use of the rotary instruments for root canal filling removal, the apical portions of the teeth were attached to the open end of a resin tube to collect the apically extruded debris. RESULTS: ProTaper Universal files were significantly faster (p=0.0011) than the ProTaper retreatment files to perform gutta-percha removal, but no significant difference was found between the files regarding the time to reach the working length or the amount of apical extrusion. CONCLUSIONS: ProTaper Universal rotary had better results for endodontic retreatment, and both techniques promote similar apical extrusion of debris.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3881755
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38817552014-01-08 Comparison of debris extruded apically and working time used by ProTaper Universal rotary and ProTaper retreatment system during gutta-percha removal UEZU, Mary Kinue Nakamune BRITTO, Maria Leticia Borges NABESHIMA, Cleber K. PALLOTTA, Raul Capp J Appl Oral Sci Original Articles OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the in vitro action of ProTaper retreatment files and ProTaper Universal in the retreatment of mandibular premolars. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The amount of debris extruded apically was measured and the time to reach the working length and to complete the removal of gutta-percha was observed. Thirty teeth had their canals prepared using ProTaper Universal files and were obturated by the single cone technique. The teeth were then stored at 37ºC in a humid environment for 7 days. During the use of the rotary instruments for root canal filling removal, the apical portions of the teeth were attached to the open end of a resin tube to collect the apically extruded debris. RESULTS: ProTaper Universal files were significantly faster (p=0.0011) than the ProTaper retreatment files to perform gutta-percha removal, but no significant difference was found between the files regarding the time to reach the working length or the amount of apical extrusion. CONCLUSIONS: ProTaper Universal rotary had better results for endodontic retreatment, and both techniques promote similar apical extrusion of debris. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC3881755/ /pubmed/21308282 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572010000600002 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
UEZU, Mary Kinue Nakamune
BRITTO, Maria Leticia Borges
NABESHIMA, Cleber K.
PALLOTTA, Raul Capp
Comparison of debris extruded apically and working time used by ProTaper Universal rotary and ProTaper retreatment system during gutta-percha removal
title Comparison of debris extruded apically and working time used by ProTaper Universal rotary and ProTaper retreatment system during gutta-percha removal
title_full Comparison of debris extruded apically and working time used by ProTaper Universal rotary and ProTaper retreatment system during gutta-percha removal
title_fullStr Comparison of debris extruded apically and working time used by ProTaper Universal rotary and ProTaper retreatment system during gutta-percha removal
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of debris extruded apically and working time used by ProTaper Universal rotary and ProTaper retreatment system during gutta-percha removal
title_short Comparison of debris extruded apically and working time used by ProTaper Universal rotary and ProTaper retreatment system during gutta-percha removal
title_sort comparison of debris extruded apically and working time used by protaper universal rotary and protaper retreatment system during gutta-percha removal
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3881755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21308282
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572010000600002
work_keys_str_mv AT uezumarykinuenakamune comparisonofdebrisextrudedapicallyandworkingtimeusedbyprotaperuniversalrotaryandprotaperretreatmentsystemduringguttapercharemoval
AT brittomarialeticiaborges comparisonofdebrisextrudedapicallyandworkingtimeusedbyprotaperuniversalrotaryandprotaperretreatmentsystemduringguttapercharemoval
AT nabeshimacleberk comparisonofdebrisextrudedapicallyandworkingtimeusedbyprotaperuniversalrotaryandprotaperretreatmentsystemduringguttapercharemoval
AT pallottaraulcapp comparisonofdebrisextrudedapicallyandworkingtimeusedbyprotaperuniversalrotaryandprotaperretreatmentsystemduringguttapercharemoval