Cargando…

Bond strength between acrylic resin and maxillofacial silicone

The development of implant dentistry improved the possibilities of rehabilitation with maxillofacial prosthesis. However, clinically it is difficult to bond the silicone to the attachment system. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of an adhesive system on the bond strength between a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: HADDAD, Marcela Filié, GOIATO, Marcelo Coelho, dos SANTOS, Daniela Micheline, CREPALDI, Nádia de Marchi, PESQUEIRA, Aldiéris Alves, BANNWART, Lisiane Cristina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3881862/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23329247
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572012000600010
_version_ 1782298281235185664
author HADDAD, Marcela Filié
GOIATO, Marcelo Coelho
dos SANTOS, Daniela Micheline
CREPALDI, Nádia de Marchi
PESQUEIRA, Aldiéris Alves
BANNWART, Lisiane Cristina
author_facet HADDAD, Marcela Filié
GOIATO, Marcelo Coelho
dos SANTOS, Daniela Micheline
CREPALDI, Nádia de Marchi
PESQUEIRA, Aldiéris Alves
BANNWART, Lisiane Cristina
author_sort HADDAD, Marcela Filié
collection PubMed
description The development of implant dentistry improved the possibilities of rehabilitation with maxillofacial prosthesis. However, clinically it is difficult to bond the silicone to the attachment system. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of an adhesive system on the bond strength between acrylic resin and facial silicone. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 120 samples were fabricated with auto-polymerized acrylic resin and MDX 4-4210 facial silicone. Both materials were bonded through mechanical retentions and/or application of primers (DC 1205 primer and Sofreliner primer S) and adhesive (Silastic Medical Adhesive Type A) or not (control group). Samples were divided into 12 groups according to the method used to attach the silicone to the acrylic resin. All samples were subjected to a T-peel test in a universal testing machine. Failures were classified as adhesive, cohesive or mixed. The data were evaluated by the analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Tukey's HSD test (α=.05). RESULTS: The highest bond strength values (5.95 N/mm; 3.07 N/mm; 4.75 N/mm) were recorded for the samples that received a Sofreliner primer application. These values were significantly higher when the samples had no scratches and did not receive the application of Silastic Medical Adhesive Type A. CONCLUSIONS: The most common type of failure was adhesive. The use of Sofreliner primer increased the bond strength between the auto-polymerized acrylic resin and the Silastic MDX 4-4210 facial silicone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3881862
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38818622014-01-08 Bond strength between acrylic resin and maxillofacial silicone HADDAD, Marcela Filié GOIATO, Marcelo Coelho dos SANTOS, Daniela Micheline CREPALDI, Nádia de Marchi PESQUEIRA, Aldiéris Alves BANNWART, Lisiane Cristina J Appl Oral Sci Original Articles The development of implant dentistry improved the possibilities of rehabilitation with maxillofacial prosthesis. However, clinically it is difficult to bond the silicone to the attachment system. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of an adhesive system on the bond strength between acrylic resin and facial silicone. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 120 samples were fabricated with auto-polymerized acrylic resin and MDX 4-4210 facial silicone. Both materials were bonded through mechanical retentions and/or application of primers (DC 1205 primer and Sofreliner primer S) and adhesive (Silastic Medical Adhesive Type A) or not (control group). Samples were divided into 12 groups according to the method used to attach the silicone to the acrylic resin. All samples were subjected to a T-peel test in a universal testing machine. Failures were classified as adhesive, cohesive or mixed. The data were evaluated by the analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Tukey's HSD test (α=.05). RESULTS: The highest bond strength values (5.95 N/mm; 3.07 N/mm; 4.75 N/mm) were recorded for the samples that received a Sofreliner primer application. These values were significantly higher when the samples had no scratches and did not receive the application of Silastic Medical Adhesive Type A. CONCLUSIONS: The most common type of failure was adhesive. The use of Sofreliner primer increased the bond strength between the auto-polymerized acrylic resin and the Silastic MDX 4-4210 facial silicone. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3881862/ /pubmed/23329247 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572012000600010 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
HADDAD, Marcela Filié
GOIATO, Marcelo Coelho
dos SANTOS, Daniela Micheline
CREPALDI, Nádia de Marchi
PESQUEIRA, Aldiéris Alves
BANNWART, Lisiane Cristina
Bond strength between acrylic resin and maxillofacial silicone
title Bond strength between acrylic resin and maxillofacial silicone
title_full Bond strength between acrylic resin and maxillofacial silicone
title_fullStr Bond strength between acrylic resin and maxillofacial silicone
title_full_unstemmed Bond strength between acrylic resin and maxillofacial silicone
title_short Bond strength between acrylic resin and maxillofacial silicone
title_sort bond strength between acrylic resin and maxillofacial silicone
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3881862/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23329247
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572012000600010
work_keys_str_mv AT haddadmarcelafilie bondstrengthbetweenacrylicresinandmaxillofacialsilicone
AT goiatomarcelocoelho bondstrengthbetweenacrylicresinandmaxillofacialsilicone
AT dossantosdanielamicheline bondstrengthbetweenacrylicresinandmaxillofacialsilicone
AT crepaldinadiademarchi bondstrengthbetweenacrylicresinandmaxillofacialsilicone
AT pesqueiraaldierisalves bondstrengthbetweenacrylicresinandmaxillofacialsilicone
AT bannwartlisianecristina bondstrengthbetweenacrylicresinandmaxillofacialsilicone