Cargando…
The influence of "C-factor" and light activation technique on polymerization contraction forces of resin composite
OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the influence of the cavity configuration factor ("C-Factor") and light activation technique on polymerization contraction forces of a Bis-GMA-based composite resin (Charisma, Heraeus Kulzer). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three different pairs of steel moving base...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São
Paulo
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3881863/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23329240 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572012000600003 |
_version_ | 1782298281467969536 |
---|---|
author | ISHIKIRIAMA, Sérgio Kiyoshi VALERETTO, Thiago Majolo FRANCO, Eduardo Batista MONDELLI, Rafael Francisco Lia |
author_facet | ISHIKIRIAMA, Sérgio Kiyoshi VALERETTO, Thiago Majolo FRANCO, Eduardo Batista MONDELLI, Rafael Francisco Lia |
author_sort | ISHIKIRIAMA, Sérgio Kiyoshi |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the influence of the cavity configuration factor ("C-Factor") and light activation technique on polymerization contraction forces of a Bis-GMA-based composite resin (Charisma, Heraeus Kulzer). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three different pairs of steel moving bases were connected to a universal testing machine (emic DL 500): groups A and B - 2x2 mm (CF=0.33), groups C and D - 3x2 mm (CF=0.66), groups e and F - 6x2 mm (CF=1.5). After adjustment of the height between the pair of bases so that the resin had a volume of 12 mm(3) in all groups, the material was inserted and polymerized by two different methods: pulse delay (100 mW/cm(2) for 5 s, 40 s interval, 600 mW/cm(2) for 20 s) and continuous pulse (600 mW/cm(2) for 20 s). Each configuration was light cured with both techniques. Tensions generated during polymerization were recorded by 120 s. The values were expressed in curves (Force(N) x Time(s)) and averages compared by statistical analysis (ANOVA and Tukey's test, p<0.05). RESULTS: For the 2x2 and 3x2 bases, with a reduced C-Factor, significant differences were found between the light curing methods. For 6x2 base, with high C-Factor, the light curing method did not influence the contraction forces of the composite resin. CONCLUSIONS: Pulse delay technique can determine less stress on tooth/restoration interface of adhesive restorations only when a reduced C-Factor is present. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3881863 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São
Paulo |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38818632014-01-08 The influence of "C-factor" and light activation technique on polymerization contraction forces of resin composite ISHIKIRIAMA, Sérgio Kiyoshi VALERETTO, Thiago Majolo FRANCO, Eduardo Batista MONDELLI, Rafael Francisco Lia J Appl Oral Sci Original Articles OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the influence of the cavity configuration factor ("C-Factor") and light activation technique on polymerization contraction forces of a Bis-GMA-based composite resin (Charisma, Heraeus Kulzer). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three different pairs of steel moving bases were connected to a universal testing machine (emic DL 500): groups A and B - 2x2 mm (CF=0.33), groups C and D - 3x2 mm (CF=0.66), groups e and F - 6x2 mm (CF=1.5). After adjustment of the height between the pair of bases so that the resin had a volume of 12 mm(3) in all groups, the material was inserted and polymerized by two different methods: pulse delay (100 mW/cm(2) for 5 s, 40 s interval, 600 mW/cm(2) for 20 s) and continuous pulse (600 mW/cm(2) for 20 s). Each configuration was light cured with both techniques. Tensions generated during polymerization were recorded by 120 s. The values were expressed in curves (Force(N) x Time(s)) and averages compared by statistical analysis (ANOVA and Tukey's test, p<0.05). RESULTS: For the 2x2 and 3x2 bases, with a reduced C-Factor, significant differences were found between the light curing methods. For 6x2 base, with high C-Factor, the light curing method did not influence the contraction forces of the composite resin. CONCLUSIONS: Pulse delay technique can determine less stress on tooth/restoration interface of adhesive restorations only when a reduced C-Factor is present. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3881863/ /pubmed/23329240 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572012000600003 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles ISHIKIRIAMA, Sérgio Kiyoshi VALERETTO, Thiago Majolo FRANCO, Eduardo Batista MONDELLI, Rafael Francisco Lia The influence of "C-factor" and light activation technique on polymerization contraction forces of resin composite |
title | The influence of "C-factor" and light activation technique on
polymerization contraction forces of resin composite |
title_full | The influence of "C-factor" and light activation technique on
polymerization contraction forces of resin composite |
title_fullStr | The influence of "C-factor" and light activation technique on
polymerization contraction forces of resin composite |
title_full_unstemmed | The influence of "C-factor" and light activation technique on
polymerization contraction forces of resin composite |
title_short | The influence of "C-factor" and light activation technique on
polymerization contraction forces of resin composite |
title_sort | influence of "c-factor" and light activation technique on
polymerization contraction forces of resin composite |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3881863/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23329240 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572012000600003 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ishikiriamasergiokiyoshi theinfluenceofcfactorandlightactivationtechniqueonpolymerizationcontractionforcesofresincomposite AT valerettothiagomajolo theinfluenceofcfactorandlightactivationtechniqueonpolymerizationcontractionforcesofresincomposite AT francoeduardobatista theinfluenceofcfactorandlightactivationtechniqueonpolymerizationcontractionforcesofresincomposite AT mondellirafaelfranciscolia theinfluenceofcfactorandlightactivationtechniqueonpolymerizationcontractionforcesofresincomposite AT ishikiriamasergiokiyoshi influenceofcfactorandlightactivationtechniqueonpolymerizationcontractionforcesofresincomposite AT valerettothiagomajolo influenceofcfactorandlightactivationtechniqueonpolymerizationcontractionforcesofresincomposite AT francoeduardobatista influenceofcfactorandlightactivationtechniqueonpolymerizationcontractionforcesofresincomposite AT mondellirafaelfranciscolia influenceofcfactorandlightactivationtechniqueonpolymerizationcontractionforcesofresincomposite |