Cargando…

The influence of "C-factor" and light activation technique on polymerization contraction forces of resin composite

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the influence of the cavity configuration factor ("C-Factor") and light activation technique on polymerization contraction forces of a Bis-GMA-based composite resin (Charisma, Heraeus Kulzer). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three different pairs of steel moving base...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: ISHIKIRIAMA, Sérgio Kiyoshi, VALERETTO, Thiago Majolo, FRANCO, Eduardo Batista, MONDELLI, Rafael Francisco Lia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3881863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23329240
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572012000600003
_version_ 1782298281467969536
author ISHIKIRIAMA, Sérgio Kiyoshi
VALERETTO, Thiago Majolo
FRANCO, Eduardo Batista
MONDELLI, Rafael Francisco Lia
author_facet ISHIKIRIAMA, Sérgio Kiyoshi
VALERETTO, Thiago Majolo
FRANCO, Eduardo Batista
MONDELLI, Rafael Francisco Lia
author_sort ISHIKIRIAMA, Sérgio Kiyoshi
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the influence of the cavity configuration factor ("C-Factor") and light activation technique on polymerization contraction forces of a Bis-GMA-based composite resin (Charisma, Heraeus Kulzer). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three different pairs of steel moving bases were connected to a universal testing machine (emic DL 500): groups A and B - 2x2 mm (CF=0.33), groups C and D - 3x2 mm (CF=0.66), groups e and F - 6x2 mm (CF=1.5). After adjustment of the height between the pair of bases so that the resin had a volume of 12 mm(3) in all groups, the material was inserted and polymerized by two different methods: pulse delay (100 mW/cm(2) for 5 s, 40 s interval, 600 mW/cm(2) for 20 s) and continuous pulse (600 mW/cm(2) for 20 s). Each configuration was light cured with both techniques. Tensions generated during polymerization were recorded by 120 s. The values were expressed in curves (Force(N) x Time(s)) and averages compared by statistical analysis (ANOVA and Tukey's test, p<0.05). RESULTS: For the 2x2 and 3x2 bases, with a reduced C-Factor, significant differences were found between the light curing methods. For 6x2 base, with high C-Factor, the light curing method did not influence the contraction forces of the composite resin. CONCLUSIONS: Pulse delay technique can determine less stress on tooth/restoration interface of adhesive restorations only when a reduced C-Factor is present.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3881863
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38818632014-01-08 The influence of "C-factor" and light activation technique on polymerization contraction forces of resin composite ISHIKIRIAMA, Sérgio Kiyoshi VALERETTO, Thiago Majolo FRANCO, Eduardo Batista MONDELLI, Rafael Francisco Lia J Appl Oral Sci Original Articles OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the influence of the cavity configuration factor ("C-Factor") and light activation technique on polymerization contraction forces of a Bis-GMA-based composite resin (Charisma, Heraeus Kulzer). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three different pairs of steel moving bases were connected to a universal testing machine (emic DL 500): groups A and B - 2x2 mm (CF=0.33), groups C and D - 3x2 mm (CF=0.66), groups e and F - 6x2 mm (CF=1.5). After adjustment of the height between the pair of bases so that the resin had a volume of 12 mm(3) in all groups, the material was inserted and polymerized by two different methods: pulse delay (100 mW/cm(2) for 5 s, 40 s interval, 600 mW/cm(2) for 20 s) and continuous pulse (600 mW/cm(2) for 20 s). Each configuration was light cured with both techniques. Tensions generated during polymerization were recorded by 120 s. The values were expressed in curves (Force(N) x Time(s)) and averages compared by statistical analysis (ANOVA and Tukey's test, p<0.05). RESULTS: For the 2x2 and 3x2 bases, with a reduced C-Factor, significant differences were found between the light curing methods. For 6x2 base, with high C-Factor, the light curing method did not influence the contraction forces of the composite resin. CONCLUSIONS: Pulse delay technique can determine less stress on tooth/restoration interface of adhesive restorations only when a reduced C-Factor is present. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3881863/ /pubmed/23329240 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572012000600003 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
ISHIKIRIAMA, Sérgio Kiyoshi
VALERETTO, Thiago Majolo
FRANCO, Eduardo Batista
MONDELLI, Rafael Francisco Lia
The influence of "C-factor" and light activation technique on polymerization contraction forces of resin composite
title The influence of "C-factor" and light activation technique on polymerization contraction forces of resin composite
title_full The influence of "C-factor" and light activation technique on polymerization contraction forces of resin composite
title_fullStr The influence of "C-factor" and light activation technique on polymerization contraction forces of resin composite
title_full_unstemmed The influence of "C-factor" and light activation technique on polymerization contraction forces of resin composite
title_short The influence of "C-factor" and light activation technique on polymerization contraction forces of resin composite
title_sort influence of "c-factor" and light activation technique on polymerization contraction forces of resin composite
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3881863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23329240
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572012000600003
work_keys_str_mv AT ishikiriamasergiokiyoshi theinfluenceofcfactorandlightactivationtechniqueonpolymerizationcontractionforcesofresincomposite
AT valerettothiagomajolo theinfluenceofcfactorandlightactivationtechniqueonpolymerizationcontractionforcesofresincomposite
AT francoeduardobatista theinfluenceofcfactorandlightactivationtechniqueonpolymerizationcontractionforcesofresincomposite
AT mondellirafaelfranciscolia theinfluenceofcfactorandlightactivationtechniqueonpolymerizationcontractionforcesofresincomposite
AT ishikiriamasergiokiyoshi influenceofcfactorandlightactivationtechniqueonpolymerizationcontractionforcesofresincomposite
AT valerettothiagomajolo influenceofcfactorandlightactivationtechniqueonpolymerizationcontractionforcesofresincomposite
AT francoeduardobatista influenceofcfactorandlightactivationtechniqueonpolymerizationcontractionforcesofresincomposite
AT mondellirafaelfranciscolia influenceofcfactorandlightactivationtechniqueonpolymerizationcontractionforcesofresincomposite