Cargando…
Comparison of static friction with self-ligating, modified slot design and conventional brackets
OBJECTIVE: To compare the static frictional forces generated at the bracket/wire interface of stainless steel brackets with different geometries and angulations, combined with orthodontic wires of different diameters. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The frictional forces were evaluated with three different ty...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São
Paulo
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3881893/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24037069 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1679-775720130097 |
_version_ | 1782298288315170816 |
---|---|
author | CASTRO, Raquel Morais SMITH NETO, Perrin HORTA, Martinho Campolina Rebello PITHON, Matheus Melo OLIVEIRA, Dauro Douglas |
author_facet | CASTRO, Raquel Morais SMITH NETO, Perrin HORTA, Martinho Campolina Rebello PITHON, Matheus Melo OLIVEIRA, Dauro Douglas |
author_sort | CASTRO, Raquel Morais |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To compare the static frictional forces generated at the bracket/wire interface of stainless steel brackets with different geometries and angulations, combined with orthodontic wires of different diameters. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The frictional forces were evaluated with three different types of metal brackets: a passive self-ligating (SmartClip(TM), 3M/Unitek, Monrovia, USA), with a modified slot design (Mini Uni Twin(TM), 3M/Unitek, Monrovia, USA) and conventional (Kirium, Abzil, São José do Rio Preto, Brazil). The samples were mounted in a testing device with three different angulations and tested with 0.014" and 0.018" stainless steel wires (American Orthodontics, Sheboygan, USA). The static frictional force was measured using a universal testing machine (DL 500, EMIC(®), São José dos Pinhais, Brazil) with a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post hoc test. RESULTS: There was a significant difference (p<0.05) in static friction when the three types of brackets were tested with the same wire size. The wire diameter influenced friction only when the brackets had a 10º angulation (p<0.05). The angulation influenced friction (p<0.05) when the brackets were associated with a 0.018" wire. CONCLUSION: Brackets with a modified slot design showed intermediate static frictional force values between the conventional and self-ligating brackets tested. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3881893 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São
Paulo |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38818932014-01-08 Comparison of static friction with self-ligating, modified slot design and conventional brackets CASTRO, Raquel Morais SMITH NETO, Perrin HORTA, Martinho Campolina Rebello PITHON, Matheus Melo OLIVEIRA, Dauro Douglas J Appl Oral Sci Original Articles OBJECTIVE: To compare the static frictional forces generated at the bracket/wire interface of stainless steel brackets with different geometries and angulations, combined with orthodontic wires of different diameters. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The frictional forces were evaluated with three different types of metal brackets: a passive self-ligating (SmartClip(TM), 3M/Unitek, Monrovia, USA), with a modified slot design (Mini Uni Twin(TM), 3M/Unitek, Monrovia, USA) and conventional (Kirium, Abzil, São José do Rio Preto, Brazil). The samples were mounted in a testing device with three different angulations and tested with 0.014" and 0.018" stainless steel wires (American Orthodontics, Sheboygan, USA). The static frictional force was measured using a universal testing machine (DL 500, EMIC(®), São José dos Pinhais, Brazil) with a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post hoc test. RESULTS: There was a significant difference (p<0.05) in static friction when the three types of brackets were tested with the same wire size. The wire diameter influenced friction only when the brackets had a 10º angulation (p<0.05). The angulation influenced friction (p<0.05) when the brackets were associated with a 0.018" wire. CONCLUSION: Brackets with a modified slot design showed intermediate static frictional force values between the conventional and self-ligating brackets tested. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3881893/ /pubmed/24037069 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1679-775720130097 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles CASTRO, Raquel Morais SMITH NETO, Perrin HORTA, Martinho Campolina Rebello PITHON, Matheus Melo OLIVEIRA, Dauro Douglas Comparison of static friction with self-ligating, modified slot design and conventional brackets |
title | Comparison of static friction with self-ligating, modified slot design
and conventional brackets |
title_full | Comparison of static friction with self-ligating, modified slot design
and conventional brackets |
title_fullStr | Comparison of static friction with self-ligating, modified slot design
and conventional brackets |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of static friction with self-ligating, modified slot design
and conventional brackets |
title_short | Comparison of static friction with self-ligating, modified slot design
and conventional brackets |
title_sort | comparison of static friction with self-ligating, modified slot design
and conventional brackets |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3881893/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24037069 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1679-775720130097 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT castroraquelmorais comparisonofstaticfrictionwithselfligatingmodifiedslotdesignandconventionalbrackets AT smithnetoperrin comparisonofstaticfrictionwithselfligatingmodifiedslotdesignandconventionalbrackets AT hortamartinhocampolinarebello comparisonofstaticfrictionwithselfligatingmodifiedslotdesignandconventionalbrackets AT pithonmatheusmelo comparisonofstaticfrictionwithselfligatingmodifiedslotdesignandconventionalbrackets AT oliveiradaurodouglas comparisonofstaticfrictionwithselfligatingmodifiedslotdesignandconventionalbrackets |