Cargando…

Comparison of static friction with self-ligating, modified slot design and conventional brackets

OBJECTIVE: To compare the static frictional forces generated at the bracket/wire interface of stainless steel brackets with different geometries and angulations, combined with orthodontic wires of different diameters. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The frictional forces were evaluated with three different ty...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: CASTRO, Raquel Morais, SMITH NETO, Perrin, HORTA, Martinho Campolina Rebello, PITHON, Matheus Melo, OLIVEIRA, Dauro Douglas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3881893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24037069
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1679-775720130097
_version_ 1782298288315170816
author CASTRO, Raquel Morais
SMITH NETO, Perrin
HORTA, Martinho Campolina Rebello
PITHON, Matheus Melo
OLIVEIRA, Dauro Douglas
author_facet CASTRO, Raquel Morais
SMITH NETO, Perrin
HORTA, Martinho Campolina Rebello
PITHON, Matheus Melo
OLIVEIRA, Dauro Douglas
author_sort CASTRO, Raquel Morais
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the static frictional forces generated at the bracket/wire interface of stainless steel brackets with different geometries and angulations, combined with orthodontic wires of different diameters. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The frictional forces were evaluated with three different types of metal brackets: a passive self-ligating (SmartClip(TM), 3M/Unitek, Monrovia, USA), with a modified slot design (Mini Uni Twin(TM), 3M/Unitek, Monrovia, USA) and conventional (Kirium, Abzil, São José do Rio Preto, Brazil). The samples were mounted in a testing device with three different angulations and tested with 0.014" and 0.018" stainless steel wires (American Orthodontics, Sheboygan, USA). The static frictional force was measured using a universal testing machine (DL 500, EMIC(®), São José dos Pinhais, Brazil) with a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post hoc test. RESULTS: There was a significant difference (p<0.05) in static friction when the three types of brackets were tested with the same wire size. The wire diameter influenced friction only when the brackets had a 10º angulation (p<0.05). The angulation influenced friction (p<0.05) when the brackets were associated with a 0.018" wire. CONCLUSION: Brackets with a modified slot design showed intermediate static frictional force values between the conventional and self-ligating brackets tested.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3881893
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38818932014-01-08 Comparison of static friction with self-ligating, modified slot design and conventional brackets CASTRO, Raquel Morais SMITH NETO, Perrin HORTA, Martinho Campolina Rebello PITHON, Matheus Melo OLIVEIRA, Dauro Douglas J Appl Oral Sci Original Articles OBJECTIVE: To compare the static frictional forces generated at the bracket/wire interface of stainless steel brackets with different geometries and angulations, combined with orthodontic wires of different diameters. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The frictional forces were evaluated with three different types of metal brackets: a passive self-ligating (SmartClip(TM), 3M/Unitek, Monrovia, USA), with a modified slot design (Mini Uni Twin(TM), 3M/Unitek, Monrovia, USA) and conventional (Kirium, Abzil, São José do Rio Preto, Brazil). The samples were mounted in a testing device with three different angulations and tested with 0.014" and 0.018" stainless steel wires (American Orthodontics, Sheboygan, USA). The static frictional force was measured using a universal testing machine (DL 500, EMIC(®), São José dos Pinhais, Brazil) with a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post hoc test. RESULTS: There was a significant difference (p<0.05) in static friction when the three types of brackets were tested with the same wire size. The wire diameter influenced friction only when the brackets had a 10º angulation (p<0.05). The angulation influenced friction (p<0.05) when the brackets were associated with a 0.018" wire. CONCLUSION: Brackets with a modified slot design showed intermediate static frictional force values between the conventional and self-ligating brackets tested. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3881893/ /pubmed/24037069 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1679-775720130097 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
CASTRO, Raquel Morais
SMITH NETO, Perrin
HORTA, Martinho Campolina Rebello
PITHON, Matheus Melo
OLIVEIRA, Dauro Douglas
Comparison of static friction with self-ligating, modified slot design and conventional brackets
title Comparison of static friction with self-ligating, modified slot design and conventional brackets
title_full Comparison of static friction with self-ligating, modified slot design and conventional brackets
title_fullStr Comparison of static friction with self-ligating, modified slot design and conventional brackets
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of static friction with self-ligating, modified slot design and conventional brackets
title_short Comparison of static friction with self-ligating, modified slot design and conventional brackets
title_sort comparison of static friction with self-ligating, modified slot design and conventional brackets
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3881893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24037069
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1679-775720130097
work_keys_str_mv AT castroraquelmorais comparisonofstaticfrictionwithselfligatingmodifiedslotdesignandconventionalbrackets
AT smithnetoperrin comparisonofstaticfrictionwithselfligatingmodifiedslotdesignandconventionalbrackets
AT hortamartinhocampolinarebello comparisonofstaticfrictionwithselfligatingmodifiedslotdesignandconventionalbrackets
AT pithonmatheusmelo comparisonofstaticfrictionwithselfligatingmodifiedslotdesignandconventionalbrackets
AT oliveiradaurodouglas comparisonofstaticfrictionwithselfligatingmodifiedslotdesignandconventionalbrackets