Cargando…

Multi-omic network signatures of disease

To better understand dynamic disease processes, integrated multi-omic methods are needed, yet comparing different types of omic data remains difficult. Integrative solutions benefit experimenters by eliminating potential biases that come with single omic analysis. We have developed the methods neede...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gibbs, David L., Gralinski, Lisa, Baric, Ralph S., McWeeney, Shannon K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3882664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24432028
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2013.00309
_version_ 1782298377792258048
author Gibbs, David L.
Gralinski, Lisa
Baric, Ralph S.
McWeeney, Shannon K.
author_facet Gibbs, David L.
Gralinski, Lisa
Baric, Ralph S.
McWeeney, Shannon K.
author_sort Gibbs, David L.
collection PubMed
description To better understand dynamic disease processes, integrated multi-omic methods are needed, yet comparing different types of omic data remains difficult. Integrative solutions benefit experimenters by eliminating potential biases that come with single omic analysis. We have developed the methods needed to explore whether a relationship exists between co-expression network models built from transcriptomic and proteomic data types, and whether this relationship can be used to improve the disease signature discovery process. A naïve, correlation based method is utilized for comparison. Using publicly available infectious disease time series data, we analyzed the related co-expression structure of the transcriptome and proteome in response to SARS-CoV infection in mice. Transcript and peptide expression data was filtered using quality scores and subset by taking the intersection on mapped Entrez IDs. Using this data set, independent co-expression networks were built. The networks were integrated by constructing a bipartite module graph based on module member overlap, module summary correlation, and correlation to phenotypes of interest. Compared to the module level results, the naïve approach is hindered by a lack of correlation across data types, less significant enrichment results, and little functional overlap across data types. Our module graph approach avoids these problems, resulting in an integrated omic signature of disease progression, which allows prioritization across data types for down-stream experiment planning. Integrated modules exhibited related functional enrichments and could suggest novel interactions in response to infection. These disease and platform-independent methods can be used to realize the full potential of multi-omic network signatures. The data (experiment SM001) are publically available through the NIAID Systems Virology (https://www.systemsvirology.org) and PNNL (http://omics.pnl.gov) web portals. Phenotype data is found in the supplementary information. The ProCoNA package is available as part of Bioconductor 2.13.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3882664
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38826642014-01-15 Multi-omic network signatures of disease Gibbs, David L. Gralinski, Lisa Baric, Ralph S. McWeeney, Shannon K. Front Genet Physiology To better understand dynamic disease processes, integrated multi-omic methods are needed, yet comparing different types of omic data remains difficult. Integrative solutions benefit experimenters by eliminating potential biases that come with single omic analysis. We have developed the methods needed to explore whether a relationship exists between co-expression network models built from transcriptomic and proteomic data types, and whether this relationship can be used to improve the disease signature discovery process. A naïve, correlation based method is utilized for comparison. Using publicly available infectious disease time series data, we analyzed the related co-expression structure of the transcriptome and proteome in response to SARS-CoV infection in mice. Transcript and peptide expression data was filtered using quality scores and subset by taking the intersection on mapped Entrez IDs. Using this data set, independent co-expression networks were built. The networks were integrated by constructing a bipartite module graph based on module member overlap, module summary correlation, and correlation to phenotypes of interest. Compared to the module level results, the naïve approach is hindered by a lack of correlation across data types, less significant enrichment results, and little functional overlap across data types. Our module graph approach avoids these problems, resulting in an integrated omic signature of disease progression, which allows prioritization across data types for down-stream experiment planning. Integrated modules exhibited related functional enrichments and could suggest novel interactions in response to infection. These disease and platform-independent methods can be used to realize the full potential of multi-omic network signatures. The data (experiment SM001) are publically available through the NIAID Systems Virology (https://www.systemsvirology.org) and PNNL (http://omics.pnl.gov) web portals. Phenotype data is found in the supplementary information. The ProCoNA package is available as part of Bioconductor 2.13. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3882664/ /pubmed/24432028 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2013.00309 Text en Copyright © 2014 Gibbs, Gralinski, Baric and McWeeney. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Gibbs, David L.
Gralinski, Lisa
Baric, Ralph S.
McWeeney, Shannon K.
Multi-omic network signatures of disease
title Multi-omic network signatures of disease
title_full Multi-omic network signatures of disease
title_fullStr Multi-omic network signatures of disease
title_full_unstemmed Multi-omic network signatures of disease
title_short Multi-omic network signatures of disease
title_sort multi-omic network signatures of disease
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3882664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24432028
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2013.00309
work_keys_str_mv AT gibbsdavidl multiomicnetworksignaturesofdisease
AT gralinskilisa multiomicnetworksignaturesofdisease
AT baricralphs multiomicnetworksignaturesofdisease
AT mcweeneyshannonk multiomicnetworksignaturesofdisease