Cargando…
Optimizing patient involvement in quality improvement
INTRODUCTION: Patient and public involvement in healthcare planning, service development and health‐related research has received significant attention. However, evidence about the role of patient involvement in quality improvement work is more limited. We aimed to characterize patient involvement i...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3883095/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23374430 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.12039 |
_version_ | 1782298405375049728 |
---|---|
author | Armstrong, Natalie Herbert, Georgia Aveling, Emma‐Louise Dixon‐Woods, Mary Martin, Graham |
author_facet | Armstrong, Natalie Herbert, Georgia Aveling, Emma‐Louise Dixon‐Woods, Mary Martin, Graham |
author_sort | Armstrong, Natalie |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Patient and public involvement in healthcare planning, service development and health‐related research has received significant attention. However, evidence about the role of patient involvement in quality improvement work is more limited. We aimed to characterize patient involvement in three improvement projects and to identify strengths and weaknesses of contrasting approaches. METHODS: Three case study quality improvement projects were purposively sampled from a broader programme. We used an ethnographic approach involving 126 in‐depth interviews, 12 weeks of non‐participant observations and documentary analysis. Data analysis was based on the constant comparative method. RESULTS: The three projects differed in the ways they involved patients in their quality improvement work, including their rationales for including patients. We characterized three very different models of patient involvement, which were each influenced by project context. Patients played distinctive roles across the three projects, acting in some cases as intermediaries between the wider patient community and clinicians, and sometimes undertaking persuasive work to convince clinicians of the need for change. We identified specific strategies that can be used to help ensure that patient involvement works most effectively and that the enthusiasm of patients to make a difference is not dissipated. CONCLUSION: Patient involvement in quality improvement work needs careful management to realize its full potential. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3883095 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38830952014-01-10 Optimizing patient involvement in quality improvement Armstrong, Natalie Herbert, Georgia Aveling, Emma‐Louise Dixon‐Woods, Mary Martin, Graham Health Expect Part 2 INTRODUCTION: Patient and public involvement in healthcare planning, service development and health‐related research has received significant attention. However, evidence about the role of patient involvement in quality improvement work is more limited. We aimed to characterize patient involvement in three improvement projects and to identify strengths and weaknesses of contrasting approaches. METHODS: Three case study quality improvement projects were purposively sampled from a broader programme. We used an ethnographic approach involving 126 in‐depth interviews, 12 weeks of non‐participant observations and documentary analysis. Data analysis was based on the constant comparative method. RESULTS: The three projects differed in the ways they involved patients in their quality improvement work, including their rationales for including patients. We characterized three very different models of patient involvement, which were each influenced by project context. Patients played distinctive roles across the three projects, acting in some cases as intermediaries between the wider patient community and clinicians, and sometimes undertaking persuasive work to convince clinicians of the need for change. We identified specific strategies that can be used to help ensure that patient involvement works most effectively and that the enthusiasm of patients to make a difference is not dissipated. CONCLUSION: Patient involvement in quality improvement work needs careful management to realize its full potential. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2013-02-03 2013-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3883095/ /pubmed/23374430 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.12039 Text en © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd Open access. |
spellingShingle | Part 2 Armstrong, Natalie Herbert, Georgia Aveling, Emma‐Louise Dixon‐Woods, Mary Martin, Graham Optimizing patient involvement in quality improvement |
title | Optimizing patient involvement in quality improvement |
title_full | Optimizing patient involvement in quality improvement |
title_fullStr | Optimizing patient involvement in quality improvement |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimizing patient involvement in quality improvement |
title_short | Optimizing patient involvement in quality improvement |
title_sort | optimizing patient involvement in quality improvement |
topic | Part 2 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3883095/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23374430 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.12039 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT armstrongnatalie optimizingpatientinvolvementinqualityimprovement AT herbertgeorgia optimizingpatientinvolvementinqualityimprovement AT avelingemmalouise optimizingpatientinvolvementinqualityimprovement AT dixonwoodsmary optimizingpatientinvolvementinqualityimprovement AT martingraham optimizingpatientinvolvementinqualityimprovement |