Cargando…
Limiting intensive care therapy in dying critically Ill patients: Experience from a tertiary care center in United Arab Emirates
BACKGROUND: Limitations of life-support interventions, by either withholding or withdrawing support, are integrated parts of intensive care unit (ICU) activities and are ethically acceptable. The end-of-life legal aspects and practices in United Arab Emirates ICUs are rarely mentioned in the medical...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3883199/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24404458 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-5151.119201 |
_version_ | 1782298413076840448 |
---|---|
author | Masood, Ur Rahman Said, Abuhasna Faris, Chedid Al Mussady, Mousab Al Jundi, Amer |
author_facet | Masood, Ur Rahman Said, Abuhasna Faris, Chedid Al Mussady, Mousab Al Jundi, Amer |
author_sort | Masood, Ur Rahman |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Limitations of life-support interventions, by either withholding or withdrawing support, are integrated parts of intensive care unit (ICU) activities and are ethically acceptable. The end-of-life legal aspects and practices in United Arab Emirates ICUs are rarely mentioned in the medical literature. The objective of this study was to examine the current practice of limiting futile life-sustaining therapies in our ICU, modalities for implementing of these decisions, and documentations in dying critically ill patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study conducted at our ICU. We studied all ICU patients who died from September 2008 to February 2009. Patients’ baseline demo-graphics, past medical problems, diagnosis on admission to ICU, and decision to withhold, withdraw and their modalities were collected. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study conducted at our ICU. We studied all ICU patients who died from September 2008 to February 2009. Patients’ baseline demo-graphics, past medical problems, diagnosis on admission to ICU, and decision to withhold, withdraw and their modalities were collected. RESULTS: The electronic medical records of 67 patients were reviewed. The commonest method of limiting therapy was no escalation 53.6%. Interventions were withheld in 41.5%. “Do not resuscitate” order was documented in only 16.3%. The commonest method of documenting limitation of therapy was discussion with the family and documenting the prognosis and futility of additional therapy (73.3%). Patients who died early (<48 hrs) compared to patients who died late (>48 hrs) of ICU admission received terminal cardiopulmonary resuscitation more frequently (P < 0.007), had less frequent prognosis documentation (P < 0.009), and had more vasopressors administered (P < 0.006). CONCLUSION: Withholding therapy after discussion with the family was the preferred mode of limiting therapy in a dying patient. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3883199 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38831992014-01-08 Limiting intensive care therapy in dying critically Ill patients: Experience from a tertiary care center in United Arab Emirates Masood, Ur Rahman Said, Abuhasna Faris, Chedid Al Mussady, Mousab Al Jundi, Amer Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Limitations of life-support interventions, by either withholding or withdrawing support, are integrated parts of intensive care unit (ICU) activities and are ethically acceptable. The end-of-life legal aspects and practices in United Arab Emirates ICUs are rarely mentioned in the medical literature. The objective of this study was to examine the current practice of limiting futile life-sustaining therapies in our ICU, modalities for implementing of these decisions, and documentations in dying critically ill patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study conducted at our ICU. We studied all ICU patients who died from September 2008 to February 2009. Patients’ baseline demo-graphics, past medical problems, diagnosis on admission to ICU, and decision to withhold, withdraw and their modalities were collected. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study conducted at our ICU. We studied all ICU patients who died from September 2008 to February 2009. Patients’ baseline demo-graphics, past medical problems, diagnosis on admission to ICU, and decision to withhold, withdraw and their modalities were collected. RESULTS: The electronic medical records of 67 patients were reviewed. The commonest method of limiting therapy was no escalation 53.6%. Interventions were withheld in 41.5%. “Do not resuscitate” order was documented in only 16.3%. The commonest method of documenting limitation of therapy was discussion with the family and documenting the prognosis and futility of additional therapy (73.3%). Patients who died early (<48 hrs) compared to patients who died late (>48 hrs) of ICU admission received terminal cardiopulmonary resuscitation more frequently (P < 0.007), had less frequent prognosis documentation (P < 0.009), and had more vasopressors administered (P < 0.006). CONCLUSION: Withholding therapy after discussion with the family was the preferred mode of limiting therapy in a dying patient. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3883199/ /pubmed/24404458 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-5151.119201 Text en Copyright: © International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Masood, Ur Rahman Said, Abuhasna Faris, Chedid Al Mussady, Mousab Al Jundi, Amer Limiting intensive care therapy in dying critically Ill patients: Experience from a tertiary care center in United Arab Emirates |
title | Limiting intensive care therapy in dying critically Ill patients: Experience from a tertiary care center in United Arab Emirates |
title_full | Limiting intensive care therapy in dying critically Ill patients: Experience from a tertiary care center in United Arab Emirates |
title_fullStr | Limiting intensive care therapy in dying critically Ill patients: Experience from a tertiary care center in United Arab Emirates |
title_full_unstemmed | Limiting intensive care therapy in dying critically Ill patients: Experience from a tertiary care center in United Arab Emirates |
title_short | Limiting intensive care therapy in dying critically Ill patients: Experience from a tertiary care center in United Arab Emirates |
title_sort | limiting intensive care therapy in dying critically ill patients: experience from a tertiary care center in united arab emirates |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3883199/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24404458 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-5151.119201 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT masoodurrahman limitingintensivecaretherapyindyingcriticallyillpatientsexperiencefromatertiarycarecenterinunitedarabemirates AT saidabuhasna limitingintensivecaretherapyindyingcriticallyillpatientsexperiencefromatertiarycarecenterinunitedarabemirates AT farischedid limitingintensivecaretherapyindyingcriticallyillpatientsexperiencefromatertiarycarecenterinunitedarabemirates AT almussadymousab limitingintensivecaretherapyindyingcriticallyillpatientsexperiencefromatertiarycarecenterinunitedarabemirates AT aljundiamer limitingintensivecaretherapyindyingcriticallyillpatientsexperiencefromatertiarycarecenterinunitedarabemirates |