Cargando…

Limiting intensive care therapy in dying critically Ill patients: Experience from a tertiary care center in United Arab Emirates

BACKGROUND: Limitations of life-support interventions, by either withholding or withdrawing support, are integrated parts of intensive care unit (ICU) activities and are ethically acceptable. The end-of-life legal aspects and practices in United Arab Emirates ICUs are rarely mentioned in the medical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Masood, Ur Rahman, Said, Abuhasna, Faris, Chedid, Al Mussady, Mousab, Al Jundi, Amer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3883199/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24404458
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-5151.119201
_version_ 1782298413076840448
author Masood, Ur Rahman
Said, Abuhasna
Faris, Chedid
Al Mussady, Mousab
Al Jundi, Amer
author_facet Masood, Ur Rahman
Said, Abuhasna
Faris, Chedid
Al Mussady, Mousab
Al Jundi, Amer
author_sort Masood, Ur Rahman
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Limitations of life-support interventions, by either withholding or withdrawing support, are integrated parts of intensive care unit (ICU) activities and are ethically acceptable. The end-of-life legal aspects and practices in United Arab Emirates ICUs are rarely mentioned in the medical literature. The objective of this study was to examine the current practice of limiting futile life-sustaining therapies in our ICU, modalities for implementing of these decisions, and documentations in dying critically ill patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study conducted at our ICU. We studied all ICU patients who died from September 2008 to February 2009. Patients’ baseline demo-graphics, past medical problems, diagnosis on admission to ICU, and decision to withhold, withdraw and their modalities were collected. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study conducted at our ICU. We studied all ICU patients who died from September 2008 to February 2009. Patients’ baseline demo-graphics, past medical problems, diagnosis on admission to ICU, and decision to withhold, withdraw and their modalities were collected. RESULTS: The electronic medical records of 67 patients were reviewed. The commonest method of limiting therapy was no escalation 53.6%. Interventions were withheld in 41.5%. “Do not resuscitate” order was documented in only 16.3%. The commonest method of documenting limitation of therapy was discussion with the family and documenting the prognosis and futility of additional therapy (73.3%). Patients who died early (<48 hrs) compared to patients who died late (>48 hrs) of ICU admission received terminal cardiopulmonary resuscitation more frequently (P < 0.007), had less frequent prognosis documentation (P < 0.009), and had more vasopressors administered (P < 0.006). CONCLUSION: Withholding therapy after discussion with the family was the preferred mode of limiting therapy in a dying patient.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3883199
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38831992014-01-08 Limiting intensive care therapy in dying critically Ill patients: Experience from a tertiary care center in United Arab Emirates Masood, Ur Rahman Said, Abuhasna Faris, Chedid Al Mussady, Mousab Al Jundi, Amer Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Limitations of life-support interventions, by either withholding or withdrawing support, are integrated parts of intensive care unit (ICU) activities and are ethically acceptable. The end-of-life legal aspects and practices in United Arab Emirates ICUs are rarely mentioned in the medical literature. The objective of this study was to examine the current practice of limiting futile life-sustaining therapies in our ICU, modalities for implementing of these decisions, and documentations in dying critically ill patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study conducted at our ICU. We studied all ICU patients who died from September 2008 to February 2009. Patients’ baseline demo-graphics, past medical problems, diagnosis on admission to ICU, and decision to withhold, withdraw and their modalities were collected. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study conducted at our ICU. We studied all ICU patients who died from September 2008 to February 2009. Patients’ baseline demo-graphics, past medical problems, diagnosis on admission to ICU, and decision to withhold, withdraw and their modalities were collected. RESULTS: The electronic medical records of 67 patients were reviewed. The commonest method of limiting therapy was no escalation 53.6%. Interventions were withheld in 41.5%. “Do not resuscitate” order was documented in only 16.3%. The commonest method of documenting limitation of therapy was discussion with the family and documenting the prognosis and futility of additional therapy (73.3%). Patients who died early (<48 hrs) compared to patients who died late (>48 hrs) of ICU admission received terminal cardiopulmonary resuscitation more frequently (P < 0.007), had less frequent prognosis documentation (P < 0.009), and had more vasopressors administered (P < 0.006). CONCLUSION: Withholding therapy after discussion with the family was the preferred mode of limiting therapy in a dying patient. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3883199/ /pubmed/24404458 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-5151.119201 Text en Copyright: © International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Masood, Ur Rahman
Said, Abuhasna
Faris, Chedid
Al Mussady, Mousab
Al Jundi, Amer
Limiting intensive care therapy in dying critically Ill patients: Experience from a tertiary care center in United Arab Emirates
title Limiting intensive care therapy in dying critically Ill patients: Experience from a tertiary care center in United Arab Emirates
title_full Limiting intensive care therapy in dying critically Ill patients: Experience from a tertiary care center in United Arab Emirates
title_fullStr Limiting intensive care therapy in dying critically Ill patients: Experience from a tertiary care center in United Arab Emirates
title_full_unstemmed Limiting intensive care therapy in dying critically Ill patients: Experience from a tertiary care center in United Arab Emirates
title_short Limiting intensive care therapy in dying critically Ill patients: Experience from a tertiary care center in United Arab Emirates
title_sort limiting intensive care therapy in dying critically ill patients: experience from a tertiary care center in united arab emirates
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3883199/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24404458
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-5151.119201
work_keys_str_mv AT masoodurrahman limitingintensivecaretherapyindyingcriticallyillpatientsexperiencefromatertiarycarecenterinunitedarabemirates
AT saidabuhasna limitingintensivecaretherapyindyingcriticallyillpatientsexperiencefromatertiarycarecenterinunitedarabemirates
AT farischedid limitingintensivecaretherapyindyingcriticallyillpatientsexperiencefromatertiarycarecenterinunitedarabemirates
AT almussadymousab limitingintensivecaretherapyindyingcriticallyillpatientsexperiencefromatertiarycarecenterinunitedarabemirates
AT aljundiamer limitingintensivecaretherapyindyingcriticallyillpatientsexperiencefromatertiarycarecenterinunitedarabemirates