Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of debris removal from root canal wall by using EndoVac and conventional needle irrigation: An in vitro study

CONTEXT: Microbial control is of paramount importance in Clinical Endodontics. Therefore, cleaning and disinfection of root canals are essential to achieve endodontic success. AIMS: The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of EndoVac irrigation system and conventional needle (30 gauges s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gade, Vandana J, Sedani, Shweta K, Lokade, Jyoti S, Belsare, Leena D, Gade, Jaykumar R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3883319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24403784
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.123019
_version_ 1782298436260855808
author Gade, Vandana J
Sedani, Shweta K
Lokade, Jyoti S
Belsare, Leena D
Gade, Jaykumar R
author_facet Gade, Vandana J
Sedani, Shweta K
Lokade, Jyoti S
Belsare, Leena D
Gade, Jaykumar R
author_sort Gade, Vandana J
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: Microbial control is of paramount importance in Clinical Endodontics. Therefore, cleaning and disinfection of root canals are essential to achieve endodontic success. AIMS: The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of EndoVac irrigation system and conventional needle (30 gauges side venting needle) irrigation for removal of debris from the root canal walls at coronal, middle and apical third by using the scanning electron microscopy (SEM). SETTINGS AND DESIGN: An in vitro randomized control trial study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 20 mandibular premolars with completely formed roots were selected and randomly divided into two groups - Group 1: Irrigation with the Conventional system and Group 2: EndoVac irrigation. After access opening and working length determination biomechanical preparation completed up to a rotary protaper F4 file. Groupwise irrigation with sodium hypochlorite and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid was done with each canal in between instrumentation. Then, the teeth were sectioned in buccolingual direction and the halves were sputter-coated with gold palladium and coronal, middle and apical third were examined by SEM at x2000 magnification. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Mann-Whitney test for comparison between methods, Kruskal-Wallis test for comparison among thirds and Miller test for individual comparisons. RESULTS: The apical, middle and cervical root canal thirds were evaluated and the results were analyzed statistically by the Mann-Whitney test for comparison between methods, Kruskal-Wallis test for comparison among thirds and Miller test for individual comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: EndoVac group resulted in significantly less debris at apical third compared with the conventional needle irrigation group. There was no statistical significant difference found in debris removal at coronal and middle third of root canal wall between the EndoVac group and conventional needle irrigation group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3883319
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38833192014-01-08 Comparative evaluation of debris removal from root canal wall by using EndoVac and conventional needle irrigation: An in vitro study Gade, Vandana J Sedani, Shweta K Lokade, Jyoti S Belsare, Leena D Gade, Jaykumar R Contemp Clin Dent Original Article CONTEXT: Microbial control is of paramount importance in Clinical Endodontics. Therefore, cleaning and disinfection of root canals are essential to achieve endodontic success. AIMS: The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of EndoVac irrigation system and conventional needle (30 gauges side venting needle) irrigation for removal of debris from the root canal walls at coronal, middle and apical third by using the scanning electron microscopy (SEM). SETTINGS AND DESIGN: An in vitro randomized control trial study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 20 mandibular premolars with completely formed roots were selected and randomly divided into two groups - Group 1: Irrigation with the Conventional system and Group 2: EndoVac irrigation. After access opening and working length determination biomechanical preparation completed up to a rotary protaper F4 file. Groupwise irrigation with sodium hypochlorite and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid was done with each canal in between instrumentation. Then, the teeth were sectioned in buccolingual direction and the halves were sputter-coated with gold palladium and coronal, middle and apical third were examined by SEM at x2000 magnification. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Mann-Whitney test for comparison between methods, Kruskal-Wallis test for comparison among thirds and Miller test for individual comparisons. RESULTS: The apical, middle and cervical root canal thirds were evaluated and the results were analyzed statistically by the Mann-Whitney test for comparison between methods, Kruskal-Wallis test for comparison among thirds and Miller test for individual comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: EndoVac group resulted in significantly less debris at apical third compared with the conventional needle irrigation group. There was no statistical significant difference found in debris removal at coronal and middle third of root canal wall between the EndoVac group and conventional needle irrigation group. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3883319/ /pubmed/24403784 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.123019 Text en Copyright: © Contemporary Clinical Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Gade, Vandana J
Sedani, Shweta K
Lokade, Jyoti S
Belsare, Leena D
Gade, Jaykumar R
Comparative evaluation of debris removal from root canal wall by using EndoVac and conventional needle irrigation: An in vitro study
title Comparative evaluation of debris removal from root canal wall by using EndoVac and conventional needle irrigation: An in vitro study
title_full Comparative evaluation of debris removal from root canal wall by using EndoVac and conventional needle irrigation: An in vitro study
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of debris removal from root canal wall by using EndoVac and conventional needle irrigation: An in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of debris removal from root canal wall by using EndoVac and conventional needle irrigation: An in vitro study
title_short Comparative evaluation of debris removal from root canal wall by using EndoVac and conventional needle irrigation: An in vitro study
title_sort comparative evaluation of debris removal from root canal wall by using endovac and conventional needle irrigation: an in vitro study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3883319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24403784
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.123019
work_keys_str_mv AT gadevandanaj comparativeevaluationofdebrisremovalfromrootcanalwallbyusingendovacandconventionalneedleirrigationaninvitrostudy
AT sedanishwetak comparativeevaluationofdebrisremovalfromrootcanalwallbyusingendovacandconventionalneedleirrigationaninvitrostudy
AT lokadejyotis comparativeevaluationofdebrisremovalfromrootcanalwallbyusingendovacandconventionalneedleirrigationaninvitrostudy
AT belsareleenad comparativeevaluationofdebrisremovalfromrootcanalwallbyusingendovacandconventionalneedleirrigationaninvitrostudy
AT gadejaykumarr comparativeevaluationofdebrisremovalfromrootcanalwallbyusingendovacandconventionalneedleirrigationaninvitrostudy