Cargando…

Evaluation of marginal leakage of different temporary restorative materials in Endodontics

AIM: The aim of this study is to assess the coronal marginal leakage of three temporary restorative materials used for root canal sealing after endodontic treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 88 single-rooted teeth were submitted to biomechanical preparation and filled by lateral condensatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Castro, Pedro Henrique Duarte FranÇa, Pereira, Juliana Vianna, Sponchiado, Emilio Carlos, Marques, André Augusto Franco, Garcia, Lucas Da Fonseca Roberti
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3883326/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24403791
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.123045
_version_ 1782298437825331200
author De Castro, Pedro Henrique Duarte FranÇa
Pereira, Juliana Vianna
Sponchiado, Emilio Carlos
Marques, André Augusto Franco
Garcia, Lucas Da Fonseca Roberti
author_facet De Castro, Pedro Henrique Duarte FranÇa
Pereira, Juliana Vianna
Sponchiado, Emilio Carlos
Marques, André Augusto Franco
Garcia, Lucas Da Fonseca Roberti
author_sort De Castro, Pedro Henrique Duarte FranÇa
collection PubMed
description AIM: The aim of this study is to assess the coronal marginal leakage of three temporary restorative materials used for root canal sealing after endodontic treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 88 single-rooted teeth were submitted to biomechanical preparation and filled by lateral condensation technique. After obturation process, the teeth were randomly separated into four groups, being two teeth of each group used as positive and negative control. Temporary sealing was performed as follows: GI - Clip F (VOCO); GII - Bioplic (Biodinβmica); GIII - Vitremer (3M ESPE) and GIV - Ketak N100 (3M ESPE). Next, the specimens were immersed into Indian ink for 30 and 60- days, being 10 specimens for each time interval and then submitted to diaphanization to verify the amount of coronal leakage using a measuring microscope. RESULTS: Leakage mean values within the 30-day period were as follows: Vitremer (0.3 mm), Ketak N100 and Clip F (0.6 mm) and Bioplic (1.7 mm). Within the 60-day period, leakage means were 1.1 mm, 1.5 mm, 2.2 mm and 2.6 mm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: None of the materials was capable of preventing marginal leakage within the 30- and 60-day period. In both time intervals, Bioplic presented the highest mean of leakage and Vitremer the lowest.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3883326
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38833262014-01-08 Evaluation of marginal leakage of different temporary restorative materials in Endodontics De Castro, Pedro Henrique Duarte FranÇa Pereira, Juliana Vianna Sponchiado, Emilio Carlos Marques, André Augusto Franco Garcia, Lucas Da Fonseca Roberti Contemp Clin Dent Original Article AIM: The aim of this study is to assess the coronal marginal leakage of three temporary restorative materials used for root canal sealing after endodontic treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 88 single-rooted teeth were submitted to biomechanical preparation and filled by lateral condensation technique. After obturation process, the teeth were randomly separated into four groups, being two teeth of each group used as positive and negative control. Temporary sealing was performed as follows: GI - Clip F (VOCO); GII - Bioplic (Biodinβmica); GIII - Vitremer (3M ESPE) and GIV - Ketak N100 (3M ESPE). Next, the specimens were immersed into Indian ink for 30 and 60- days, being 10 specimens for each time interval and then submitted to diaphanization to verify the amount of coronal leakage using a measuring microscope. RESULTS: Leakage mean values within the 30-day period were as follows: Vitremer (0.3 mm), Ketak N100 and Clip F (0.6 mm) and Bioplic (1.7 mm). Within the 60-day period, leakage means were 1.1 mm, 1.5 mm, 2.2 mm and 2.6 mm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: None of the materials was capable of preventing marginal leakage within the 30- and 60-day period. In both time intervals, Bioplic presented the highest mean of leakage and Vitremer the lowest. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3883326/ /pubmed/24403791 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.123045 Text en Copyright: © Contemporary Clinical Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
De Castro, Pedro Henrique Duarte FranÇa
Pereira, Juliana Vianna
Sponchiado, Emilio Carlos
Marques, André Augusto Franco
Garcia, Lucas Da Fonseca Roberti
Evaluation of marginal leakage of different temporary restorative materials in Endodontics
title Evaluation of marginal leakage of different temporary restorative materials in Endodontics
title_full Evaluation of marginal leakage of different temporary restorative materials in Endodontics
title_fullStr Evaluation of marginal leakage of different temporary restorative materials in Endodontics
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of marginal leakage of different temporary restorative materials in Endodontics
title_short Evaluation of marginal leakage of different temporary restorative materials in Endodontics
title_sort evaluation of marginal leakage of different temporary restorative materials in endodontics
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3883326/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24403791
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.123045
work_keys_str_mv AT decastropedrohenriqueduartefranca evaluationofmarginalleakageofdifferenttemporaryrestorativematerialsinendodontics
AT pereirajulianavianna evaluationofmarginalleakageofdifferenttemporaryrestorativematerialsinendodontics
AT sponchiadoemiliocarlos evaluationofmarginalleakageofdifferenttemporaryrestorativematerialsinendodontics
AT marquesandreaugustofranco evaluationofmarginalleakageofdifferenttemporaryrestorativematerialsinendodontics
AT garcialucasdafonsecaroberti evaluationofmarginalleakageofdifferenttemporaryrestorativematerialsinendodontics