Cargando…

A type A aortic dissection missed by non-cardiac gated contrast-enhanced computed tomography due to an aortic root dissection flap masquerading as an aortic valve apparatus: a case report

INTRODUCTION: Though computed tomographic angiography has very high sensitivity and specificity to diagnose acute aortic dissection, false-negative studies can occur and secondary tests may be required to make the diagnosis. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a 57-year-old Caucasian man with a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nagra, Karan, Coulden, Richard, McMurtry, Michael Sean
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3883470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377648
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-1947-7-285
_version_ 1782298459867447296
author Nagra, Karan
Coulden, Richard
McMurtry, Michael Sean
author_facet Nagra, Karan
Coulden, Richard
McMurtry, Michael Sean
author_sort Nagra, Karan
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Though computed tomographic angiography has very high sensitivity and specificity to diagnose acute aortic dissection, false-negative studies can occur and secondary tests may be required to make the diagnosis. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a 57-year-old Caucasian man with a typical presentation for acute type A aortic dissection in whom the initial non-cardiac gated computed tomographic angiogram was negative, leading to a delay in surgical management. Transesophageal echocardiography and post hoc 3D reconstruction of the original computed tomographic scan revealed a dissection flap confined to the aortic root, immediately superior to the sinuses of Valsalva and masquerading as part of the aortic valve apparatus. CONCLUSION: This case demonstrates that false-negative computed tomographic angiograms taken to rule out type A aortic dissection can occur and that secondary imaging tests, such as echocardiography, should be performed in cases in which the pre-test probability of aortic dissection is high. Cardiac gating of computed tomographic angiograms to exclude aortic dissection may enhance diagnostic accuracy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3883470
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38834702014-01-08 A type A aortic dissection missed by non-cardiac gated contrast-enhanced computed tomography due to an aortic root dissection flap masquerading as an aortic valve apparatus: a case report Nagra, Karan Coulden, Richard McMurtry, Michael Sean J Med Case Rep Case Report INTRODUCTION: Though computed tomographic angiography has very high sensitivity and specificity to diagnose acute aortic dissection, false-negative studies can occur and secondary tests may be required to make the diagnosis. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a 57-year-old Caucasian man with a typical presentation for acute type A aortic dissection in whom the initial non-cardiac gated computed tomographic angiogram was negative, leading to a delay in surgical management. Transesophageal echocardiography and post hoc 3D reconstruction of the original computed tomographic scan revealed a dissection flap confined to the aortic root, immediately superior to the sinuses of Valsalva and masquerading as part of the aortic valve apparatus. CONCLUSION: This case demonstrates that false-negative computed tomographic angiograms taken to rule out type A aortic dissection can occur and that secondary imaging tests, such as echocardiography, should be performed in cases in which the pre-test probability of aortic dissection is high. Cardiac gating of computed tomographic angiograms to exclude aortic dissection may enhance diagnostic accuracy. BioMed Central 2013-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3883470/ /pubmed/24377648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-1947-7-285 Text en Copyright © 2013 Nagra et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Case Report
Nagra, Karan
Coulden, Richard
McMurtry, Michael Sean
A type A aortic dissection missed by non-cardiac gated contrast-enhanced computed tomography due to an aortic root dissection flap masquerading as an aortic valve apparatus: a case report
title A type A aortic dissection missed by non-cardiac gated contrast-enhanced computed tomography due to an aortic root dissection flap masquerading as an aortic valve apparatus: a case report
title_full A type A aortic dissection missed by non-cardiac gated contrast-enhanced computed tomography due to an aortic root dissection flap masquerading as an aortic valve apparatus: a case report
title_fullStr A type A aortic dissection missed by non-cardiac gated contrast-enhanced computed tomography due to an aortic root dissection flap masquerading as an aortic valve apparatus: a case report
title_full_unstemmed A type A aortic dissection missed by non-cardiac gated contrast-enhanced computed tomography due to an aortic root dissection flap masquerading as an aortic valve apparatus: a case report
title_short A type A aortic dissection missed by non-cardiac gated contrast-enhanced computed tomography due to an aortic root dissection flap masquerading as an aortic valve apparatus: a case report
title_sort type a aortic dissection missed by non-cardiac gated contrast-enhanced computed tomography due to an aortic root dissection flap masquerading as an aortic valve apparatus: a case report
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3883470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377648
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-1947-7-285
work_keys_str_mv AT nagrakaran atypeaaorticdissectionmissedbynoncardiacgatedcontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyduetoanaorticrootdissectionflapmasqueradingasanaorticvalveapparatusacasereport
AT couldenrichard atypeaaorticdissectionmissedbynoncardiacgatedcontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyduetoanaorticrootdissectionflapmasqueradingasanaorticvalveapparatusacasereport
AT mcmurtrymichaelsean atypeaaorticdissectionmissedbynoncardiacgatedcontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyduetoanaorticrootdissectionflapmasqueradingasanaorticvalveapparatusacasereport
AT nagrakaran typeaaorticdissectionmissedbynoncardiacgatedcontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyduetoanaorticrootdissectionflapmasqueradingasanaorticvalveapparatusacasereport
AT couldenrichard typeaaorticdissectionmissedbynoncardiacgatedcontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyduetoanaorticrootdissectionflapmasqueradingasanaorticvalveapparatusacasereport
AT mcmurtrymichaelsean typeaaorticdissectionmissedbynoncardiacgatedcontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyduetoanaorticrootdissectionflapmasqueradingasanaorticvalveapparatusacasereport