Cargando…
A type A aortic dissection missed by non-cardiac gated contrast-enhanced computed tomography due to an aortic root dissection flap masquerading as an aortic valve apparatus: a case report
INTRODUCTION: Though computed tomographic angiography has very high sensitivity and specificity to diagnose acute aortic dissection, false-negative studies can occur and secondary tests may be required to make the diagnosis. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a 57-year-old Caucasian man with a...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3883470/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-1947-7-285 |
_version_ | 1782298459867447296 |
---|---|
author | Nagra, Karan Coulden, Richard McMurtry, Michael Sean |
author_facet | Nagra, Karan Coulden, Richard McMurtry, Michael Sean |
author_sort | Nagra, Karan |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Though computed tomographic angiography has very high sensitivity and specificity to diagnose acute aortic dissection, false-negative studies can occur and secondary tests may be required to make the diagnosis. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a 57-year-old Caucasian man with a typical presentation for acute type A aortic dissection in whom the initial non-cardiac gated computed tomographic angiogram was negative, leading to a delay in surgical management. Transesophageal echocardiography and post hoc 3D reconstruction of the original computed tomographic scan revealed a dissection flap confined to the aortic root, immediately superior to the sinuses of Valsalva and masquerading as part of the aortic valve apparatus. CONCLUSION: This case demonstrates that false-negative computed tomographic angiograms taken to rule out type A aortic dissection can occur and that secondary imaging tests, such as echocardiography, should be performed in cases in which the pre-test probability of aortic dissection is high. Cardiac gating of computed tomographic angiograms to exclude aortic dissection may enhance diagnostic accuracy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3883470 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38834702014-01-08 A type A aortic dissection missed by non-cardiac gated contrast-enhanced computed tomography due to an aortic root dissection flap masquerading as an aortic valve apparatus: a case report Nagra, Karan Coulden, Richard McMurtry, Michael Sean J Med Case Rep Case Report INTRODUCTION: Though computed tomographic angiography has very high sensitivity and specificity to diagnose acute aortic dissection, false-negative studies can occur and secondary tests may be required to make the diagnosis. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a 57-year-old Caucasian man with a typical presentation for acute type A aortic dissection in whom the initial non-cardiac gated computed tomographic angiogram was negative, leading to a delay in surgical management. Transesophageal echocardiography and post hoc 3D reconstruction of the original computed tomographic scan revealed a dissection flap confined to the aortic root, immediately superior to the sinuses of Valsalva and masquerading as part of the aortic valve apparatus. CONCLUSION: This case demonstrates that false-negative computed tomographic angiograms taken to rule out type A aortic dissection can occur and that secondary imaging tests, such as echocardiography, should be performed in cases in which the pre-test probability of aortic dissection is high. Cardiac gating of computed tomographic angiograms to exclude aortic dissection may enhance diagnostic accuracy. BioMed Central 2013-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3883470/ /pubmed/24377648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-1947-7-285 Text en Copyright © 2013 Nagra et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Case Report Nagra, Karan Coulden, Richard McMurtry, Michael Sean A type A aortic dissection missed by non-cardiac gated contrast-enhanced computed tomography due to an aortic root dissection flap masquerading as an aortic valve apparatus: a case report |
title | A type A aortic dissection missed by non-cardiac gated contrast-enhanced computed tomography due to an aortic root dissection flap masquerading as an aortic valve apparatus: a case report |
title_full | A type A aortic dissection missed by non-cardiac gated contrast-enhanced computed tomography due to an aortic root dissection flap masquerading as an aortic valve apparatus: a case report |
title_fullStr | A type A aortic dissection missed by non-cardiac gated contrast-enhanced computed tomography due to an aortic root dissection flap masquerading as an aortic valve apparatus: a case report |
title_full_unstemmed | A type A aortic dissection missed by non-cardiac gated contrast-enhanced computed tomography due to an aortic root dissection flap masquerading as an aortic valve apparatus: a case report |
title_short | A type A aortic dissection missed by non-cardiac gated contrast-enhanced computed tomography due to an aortic root dissection flap masquerading as an aortic valve apparatus: a case report |
title_sort | type a aortic dissection missed by non-cardiac gated contrast-enhanced computed tomography due to an aortic root dissection flap masquerading as an aortic valve apparatus: a case report |
topic | Case Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3883470/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-1947-7-285 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nagrakaran atypeaaorticdissectionmissedbynoncardiacgatedcontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyduetoanaorticrootdissectionflapmasqueradingasanaorticvalveapparatusacasereport AT couldenrichard atypeaaorticdissectionmissedbynoncardiacgatedcontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyduetoanaorticrootdissectionflapmasqueradingasanaorticvalveapparatusacasereport AT mcmurtrymichaelsean atypeaaorticdissectionmissedbynoncardiacgatedcontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyduetoanaorticrootdissectionflapmasqueradingasanaorticvalveapparatusacasereport AT nagrakaran typeaaorticdissectionmissedbynoncardiacgatedcontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyduetoanaorticrootdissectionflapmasqueradingasanaorticvalveapparatusacasereport AT couldenrichard typeaaorticdissectionmissedbynoncardiacgatedcontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyduetoanaorticrootdissectionflapmasqueradingasanaorticvalveapparatusacasereport AT mcmurtrymichaelsean typeaaorticdissectionmissedbynoncardiacgatedcontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyduetoanaorticrootdissectionflapmasqueradingasanaorticvalveapparatusacasereport |