Cargando…
Open Science and Reporting Animal Studies: Who's Accountable?
If being open means maximizing the number of people a paper can reach and minimizing the difficulties of re-using the information within it, then the release of all information associated with a paper is critical. For ethical reasons, high standards of reporting are extra critical in regards to anim...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3883631/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24409097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001757 |
_version_ | 1782298477871497216 |
---|---|
author | Eisen, Jonathan A. Ganley, Emma MacCallum, Catriona J. |
author_facet | Eisen, Jonathan A. Ganley, Emma MacCallum, Catriona J. |
author_sort | Eisen, Jonathan A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | If being open means maximizing the number of people a paper can reach and minimizing the difficulties of re-using the information within it, then the release of all information associated with a paper is critical. For ethical reasons, high standards of reporting are extra critical in regards to animal research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3883631 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38836312014-01-09 Open Science and Reporting Animal Studies: Who's Accountable? Eisen, Jonathan A. Ganley, Emma MacCallum, Catriona J. PLoS Biol Editorial If being open means maximizing the number of people a paper can reach and minimizing the difficulties of re-using the information within it, then the release of all information associated with a paper is critical. For ethical reasons, high standards of reporting are extra critical in regards to animal research. Public Library of Science 2014-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3883631/ /pubmed/24409097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001757 Text en © 2014 Eisen et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Editorial Eisen, Jonathan A. Ganley, Emma MacCallum, Catriona J. Open Science and Reporting Animal Studies: Who's Accountable? |
title | Open Science and Reporting Animal Studies: Who's Accountable? |
title_full | Open Science and Reporting Animal Studies: Who's Accountable? |
title_fullStr | Open Science and Reporting Animal Studies: Who's Accountable? |
title_full_unstemmed | Open Science and Reporting Animal Studies: Who's Accountable? |
title_short | Open Science and Reporting Animal Studies: Who's Accountable? |
title_sort | open science and reporting animal studies: who's accountable? |
topic | Editorial |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3883631/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24409097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001757 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT eisenjonathana openscienceandreportinganimalstudieswhosaccountable AT ganleyemma openscienceandreportinganimalstudieswhosaccountable AT maccallumcatrionaj openscienceandreportinganimalstudieswhosaccountable |